
recovering academic ~ writer ~ somewhat techy ~ @InferentFutures ~ the online careers community for university students - run by students for students
Europe
Joined June 2012
- Tweets1.7K
- Following1.8K
- Followers352
- Likes1.4K
Patrick Fullick retweeted
🧠 Did you know 🧠 Manhattan Project scientists debated about whether it'd be too risky to continue if there was even a ***1 in 300,000 chance*** that a single nuke would burn the atmosphere?
They would rather lose WWII.
Meanwhile, in AI:
Largest ever survey of 2,778 AI researchers:
Average AI researcher: there’s a 16% chance AI causes extinction (literal Russian Roulette odds)
Interesting stats:
- Just 38% think faster AI progress is good for humanity (sit with this)
- Over 95% are concerned about dangerous groups using AI to make powerful tools (e.g. engineered viruses)
- Over 95% are concerned about AI being used to manipulate large-scale public opinion
- Over 95% are concerned about AI making it easier to spread false information (e.g. deepfakes)
- Over 90% are concerned about authoritarian rulers using AI to control their population
- Over 90% are concerned about AIs worsening economic inequality
- Over 90% are concerned about bias (e.g. AIs discriminating by gender or race)
- Over 80% are concerned about a powerful AI having its goals not set right, causing a catastrophe (e.g. it develops and uses powerful weapons)
- Over 80% are concerned about people interacting with other humans less because they’re spending more time with AIs
- Over 80% are concerned about near-full automation of labor leaves most people economically powerless
- Over 80% are concerned about AIs with the wrong goals becoming very powerful and reducing the role of humans in making decisions
- Over 70% are concerned about near-full automation of labor makes people struggle to find meaning in their lives
- 70% want to prioritize AI safety research more, 7% less (10 to 1)
- 86% say the AI alignment problem is important, 14% say unimportant (7 to 1)
Do they think AI progress slowed down in the second half of 2023? No. 60% said it was faster vs 17% who said it was slower.
Will we be able to understand what AIs are really thinking in 2028? Just 20% say this is likely.
IMAGE BELOW: They asked the researchers what year AI will be able to achieve various tasks.
If you’re confused because it seems like many of the tasks below have already been achieved, it’s because they made the criteria quite difficult.
Despite this, I feel some of the tasks already have been achieved (e.g. Good high school history essay: “Write an essay for a high-school history class that would receive high grades and pass plagiarism detectors.”)
NOTE: The exact p(doom) question: "What probability do you put on future AI advances causing human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species?"
Mean: 16.2%
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Just published - the latest edition of the whatIF podcast! Muhammad, Sienna and Olivia talk about hashtag #students using #AI in their work at #university and in their first #jobs after graduating.
The use of LLMs in education is a hot topic for discussion right now - have a listen to see how students are embracing these powerful new tools in order to learn and perform better, and how aware they are of the need to use them responsibly and ethically.
open.spotify.com/episode/7t6…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Join our mailing lists to learn about what’s new in ifutures! inferentialfutures.com/mail-…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
I am having a day, so here’s an emotional and oversharey thread about how it feels to accidentally stumble into the world of AI safety as a technologically illiterate person 🧵
Patrick Fullick retweeted
A warm welcome to all new Magdalene Members! This year we welcome 192 new students - 105 undergraduates and 87 postgraduates. We offer a warm welcome to all new Members of the Magdalene community and wish them happiness and success during their time with us.
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Calling in the government on AI is like calling in Godzilla on Tokyo. You shouldn't do it because you're hoping Godzilla will carefully enact a detailed land-use reform policy. You should do it if humanity would be better off with less Tokyo. That, Godzilla can do.
Patrick Fullick retweeted
I tried that instant AI translation tool (labs.heygen.com/video-transl…) and it's one of the most amazing things I've ever seen.
I gave it a 35 second video of me speaking English.
And this is what I got - that's my voice! But I don't speak a word of German...
Patrick Fullick retweeted
my friends who are parents don't seem very impressed with my latest theory of childrearing, that you should start out your kids in a giant dirt pit under regular attack by robotic velociraptors, maybe up to age 6, so that afterwards ordinary Earth standards of living will seem to them like supreme luxury because their baseline brain expectations will have been set very low
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Higher education needs to prepare students for a data-driven world, but so far it is falling short. Here’s how to get there, writes data science expert Nathan Kelber [@nkelber].▫️insidehighered.com/opinion/v… @insidehighered
Patrick Fullick retweeted
1. Introducing a “Natural History” GCSE won’t help
2. CompSci should be rolled in with Biology, Chemistry, Physics as the fourth science of the compulsory science course at GCSE. Lots of synergy
@Amanda_Spielman @JulieR_ISC @CompAtSch thetimes.co.uk/article/ofste…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Replying to @pofokgg @sophpender
I think the fact the pathways are often haphazard is a key part of the message of good careers advice, because if you approach that serendipity in a deliberate and conscious way, you can navigate it to more positive outcomes.
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Justice for Finland! The people’s champion #Eurovision
🇫🇮 Finland | Käärijä - Cha Cha Cha
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Kind of hilarious with as many rapid advances in AI as we’ve seen Siri is as bad as it is with more than a decade head start
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Thought provoking talks from @MaryMyatt @Barristotle @PatrickFullick & @rondelle10_b at this EdTech challenges event 🤔
Looking forward to speaking about the challenges of Edtech at the Dana Library at @SmgResearch
With @Barristotle @rondelle10_b @PatrickFullick @air_maths
Wednesday 10 May 17:30 free to attend, places limited
Tickets available here
sciencemuseum.org.uk/researc…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Upcoming event at the Dana Library: The Challenges of Edtech: three perspectives, with @MaryMyatt @rondelle10_b @PatrickFullick @Barristotle
Wednesday 10 May 17:30
#ChatGPT #edtech
Tickets are free but places are limited. Book here: sciencemuseum.org.uk/researc…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
Day 11(a). BRiC's October Project 2022. I Am More Than My Cancer"I am a season ticket holder at Aston Villa and travel to games from my home in Yorkshire with fellow Yorkshire Villains" breastcancerawarenessmonth #breastcancer #Resilience #mentalhealth #football #AstonVilla
Patrick Fullick retweeted
LinkedIn is starting to attract sophisticated scammers who threaten its credibility bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Patrick Fullick retweeted
THREAD: How to check if a tweet screenshot is fake?
Dozens of fake screnshots of tweets have gone viral in recently. So, here's a simple guide on how one can quickly check if a screenshot of a tweet attributed to an account is genuine or fake before falling for or sharing it.































