Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott) header
Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott) profile picture

Former British Ambassador to Turkey, France, USA. On various boards & think tanks. Author of ‘They Call it Diplomacy’ (2021). Anxious Arsenal supporter.

London, England
Joined February 2013
Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)Photo by Peter Westmacott (@PeterWestmacott)
Brave and thoughtful words from @badralbusaidi, the foreign minister who was reporting (to Vance) good progress from his mediation between Iran and the US in Geneva when US/Israel started their war against Iran on 28 February.
Significant even brave intervention by Oman foreign minister @badralbusaidi at Cambridge calling for the Gulf States to form a non-aggression pact with Iran and Iraq. Says US should no longer be primary provider of security in region, adding external partners have imposed the most damaging of the priorities - "the requirement that Iran be excluded. Not just excluded. Worse. Positioned as the threat against which regional security had to be organised." He argues "What holds us back is that issues which ought to be handled at a regional level by the states of the Gulf themselves, are made more complex, more intractable and sometimes simply impossible to resolve because the region's security arrangements are insufficiently developed. "And they are insufficiently developed because they have relied for too long on the involvement of external powers. "The complications which stand in the way of successful resolutions to both the Iranian nuclear issue and the question of free navigation through the Strait of Hormuz are simply the latest effects of an unstable combination of power projection and dependency in the Gulf. "In other words, the nuclear issue and the Hormuz issue are both impossible to resolve because external powers continue to define the terms of engagement, while regional powers are unable to take collective responsibility for making their own security arrangements and reach a consensus on them". Says Iran "has for nearly half a century been systematically excluded from playing any meaningful role in the security arrangements of the region. "An exclusion with profoundly negative consequences, not just for Iran, but for the region as a whole". He says "Instead of a genuine security structure designed to maintain stable relations between the eight states of the Gulf, an unstable regional system has been constructed on the entirely false perception that there is a fundamental regional antagonism between Iran and the Arab states of the Gulf. "There is no such fundamental antagonism. There are problems, yes, of course. But the plain fact is that Arabs and Persians have lived in peace around the Gulf for centuries. It’s not a matter of whether you’re friendly or hostile to Iran. "Today, Persia is a fact, 93 million people and three thousand years of history. Roughly half of the Gulf littoral. "Any Gulf security architecture that doesn’t include them is inherently unstable. It’s structurally unsound. And recent events expose the terrible cost of allowing the false perception of antagonism and exclusion." "It is us, in the Gulf, who ultimately bear the responsibility for devising, developing and implementing a new regional security structure. The time has come when it no longer makes sense just to blame everyone else. We need to begin a new regional dialogue on Gulf security, and we need to do so before other solutions are imposed on the region which would effectively consolidate the pattern of dependency and exclusion for which we urgently need to find an alternative. What is needed, instead, is a new and inclusive framework, involving all eight Gulf littoral states".
1
320
Peter Westmacott retweeted
It begins....
Breaking news: The Justice Department has moved to preemptively block certification of the results of Alaska’s Senate race if Republican incumbent Sen. Dan S. Sullivan loses his tight race against Democrat Mary Peltola next month. wapo.st/47GV3EC
45
407
9
4,026
212,087
Thanks for clarifying Tim. Others in Spectator and elsewhere have done so.
Replying to @PeterWestmacott
I haven’t written anything about his wife, Peter. My story was about his irritation over Miliband ignoring his counsel
2
2,218
Leave him be. JP has been an outstanding NSA. He only agreed to stay on beyond 70 because PM asked him to. Last time I looked his wife was not a government employee. And the proscription of Palestine Action is still under review by the Supreme Court.
As revealed by the Spectator on Thursday morning
56
8
2
62
29,894
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Latest: ​Zelenskyy tells reporters over WhatsApp that restrictions on Ukraine's Starlink systems remain. Interceptor drones can't function, logistics and operations hobbled. The maximum speed is 161 kph; "exceeding this limit causes the Starlink connection to cut out completely, resulting in the loss of the drone." He says Ukraine has done tests to determine whether SpaceX is truly facing technical issues, as has been told Kyiv by the US side, or if this is a "deliberate operation... to restrict us, cut us off, and prevent us from defending ourselves and protecting our people, both at the front and among the civilian population." He says Ukraine "sent a couple of vehicles equipped with Starlink terminals into European Union territory." "They moved at speeds exceeding 180kph, and the Starlink systems worked perfectly. We have the relevant logs and evidence to prove this." He adds: "The conclusion is clear: the restrictions are in effect within Ukraine but do not apply within the European Union. In other words, this is a planned operation."
1,010
9,229
927
28,037
2,186,464
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Trump is lying again. Putin started the war and has repeatedly refused to negotiate to end it. The US spent nothing like $350 billion. Half the money is not missing. Washington and Moscow are both significantly more corrupt than Kyiv. Putin, not Zelensky, is a dictator who openly steals elections.
And not a word about Putin, who started this bloody war and is killing Ukrainians. Trump is Putin's friend, as he himself says.
911
5,104
210
16,094
243,738
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Turkish Government Takes Over Independent TV News Channel hrw.org/news/2026/10/14/turk…
4
3
383
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Strange how Ukraine prefers to keep its citizens alive instead of helping Trump in the midterms
White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia nods along on Fox & Friends as Rachel Campos-Duffy blasts that "ingrate Zelenskyy who keeps blowing up refineries and making things more complicated for the president ahead of the midterms"
95
1,342
31
6,962
106,497
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Netanyahu supporters seem to be taking advantage of @Brett_McGurk’s book and interviews to claim vindication for Netanyahu’s conduct of the war in Gaza. But while Brett’s front-row account is valuable, that doesn’t mean it is definitive or its perspectives widely shared—including among former members of the Biden administration. I would say most of my former colleagues think that President Biden should have put more pressure on Israel to conduct the war differently and end it sooner, and few think that the biggest mistake Biden made was to show daylight with Israel. And even Brett’s account makes clear that hostages were not the top priority for Netanyahu and that when U.S. pressure actually was applied—as after the World Central Kitchen strike—it worked. Brett tells the story of the Biden phone call after that tragedy, but not the story of how Biden called Netanyahu on July 4, 2024 to press him to conclude the hostage deal after Hamas had finally accepted the basic framework, dropping its demand that Israel commit to a permanent ceasefire before any hostages were released. Netanyahu instead added so many of his own conditions—against the advice of his own security chiefs—that the deal became impossible for another six months, during which nearly 9,000 more Palestinians were killed and more Israeli hostages died, including the six that Hamas executed in August. The Israeli changes included a demand that Israel retain forces along Gaza’s entire border with Egypt, which the IDF had seized only after the original proposal, and a new enforcement mechanism to screen Gazans who were returning home to the north which would have required Israeli troops to remain in central Gaza. Both of those new conditions were dropped in the deal ultimately concluded in January 2025. Nothing in the book or elsewhere changes the reality that October 7 happened on Netanyahu’s watch; that he prioritized “total victory” and the maintenance of his coalition over a hostage deal or an end of the war; that his conduct of the war and management of its humanitarian consequences catastrophic; that it has left Israel more isolated and insecure; and that it has deeply damaged, perhaps irreparably, Israel’s relationship with the United States—which should have done more to change Israel’s conduct rather than enable it. There was never an easy way forward in Gaza, but no version of the story vindicates Netanyahu.
126
217
78
946
367,394
Same here Tom. He bought me lunch and encouraged me to keep writing, with his master novelist’s tips. Kind, humble, amusing.
I’m so sad to hear that Jeffrey Archer has died. A brilliant, generous and kind human being. When he heard I’d also written a book about our mutual hero years after his, he bought me lunch and offered me any help he could for mine (including below’s joint talk). What perhaps less people knew is just how hard he worked. When I admitted I’d only written two drafts of my book, he told me “that’s the problem with you bloody journalists”. For each book he wrote, he did 14 drafts. And he pumped out 42 best sellers like that. RIP in novelists’ heaven Jeffrey.
2
456
Peter Westmacott retweeted
In 2019, Trump was forced to cancel plans to hold the G7 at his own golf club amid GOP objections to self dealing. In 2026, he will hold the G20 at his own golf club and the critics have gone silent. How Trump has moved the ethical line in his second term. nytimes.com/2026/10/04/us/po…
453
4,035
201
9,071
460,324
Extract from POTUS interview w Time Magazine. Time : How can the president of peace be calling for the annihilation of an entire people?  Trump: Because by annihilating Iran, we've created peace in the world. With Iran, I don't think you could ever have peace.
1
1
349
Peter Westmacott retweeted
If you have not read @saadmohseni Radio Free Afghanistan yet, do it now. It is an excellent read and tremendously informative
'Perhaps the best of the memoirs of Afghanistan so far published' @FT The deeply moving and surprising story of the attempt to build a truly independent media company in contemporary Afghanistan. RADIO FREE AFGHANISTAN @saadmohseni is out in paperback now!
11
59
14,967
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Former British ambassador to the United States Sir Peter Westmacott speaks to @MhariAurora on the Chagos deal and why it is so strategically important for both the US and the UK. 🔗 Read more on the story here - trib.al/0EaMxnt
16
5
21
49,070
Peter Westmacott retweeted
A very proud moment for Volex as we join the FTSE 250. Our inclusion in the index is a reflection of how far the business has come and the scale we have built over recent years. That progress has been driven by our people across the world, alongside the customers, partners and investors who have supported us along the way. Congratulations to every colleague who has played a part in getting Volex to this point.
🎉 Congratulations to Volex on its inclusion in the #FTSE250 Less than two months after moving from AIM to the Main Market, another major milestone for the business. #MainMarket #CapitalMarkets #LondonStockExchange
47
18
1
133
21,459
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Extraordinary journalism from @NewYorker, on Jared Kushner's catastrophic diplomacy, conflicts of interest, arrogance. He represents "a new kind of Washington figure, for whom public office serves as a means to extraordinary wealth" newyorker.com/magazine/2026/…
522
8,942
279
24,882
915,550
Peter Westmacott retweeted
Some details: Kremlev, the Russian who sponsored Don Jr's wedding, is a former member of the Night Wolves biker gang, went to China with Putin and is personally sanctioned by Ukraine for his role in abducting children
411
9,407
439
21,996
1,337,931
Listening to Hassan Rouhani today, it is hard not to think about one of the most consequential strategic costs of the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA: it dramatically weakened the very forces inside Iran that were actually seeking to change the Islamic Republic’s trajectory. Rouhani was no Zionist, nor was he a pacifist. But he understood that Iran needed to change course and deepen its economic and diplomatic engagement with the West, including the United States. Much has rightly been written about the nuclear consequences of leaving the JCPOA. After the U.S. withdrawal, Iran dramatically expanded its enrichment program and moved far beyond the restrictions imposed by the agreement. But there was also a profound political consequence inside Iran that receives far less attention. In 2017, Rouhani decisively defeated Ebrahim Raisi, the candidate most closely identified with Ali Khamenei and the conservative establishment. Rouhani's argument was essentially that engagement could deliver tangible benefits for Iran. The collapse of the nuclear agreement destroyed much of the political foundation for that argument and strengthened those who had always insisted that Washington could never be trusted. Today, instead of dealing with Rouhani and those who advocated greater engagement with the West, we are dealing with figures such as Ahmad Vahidi, majid Mousavi, and Mojtaba Khamenei. Counterfactual history is always dangerous. We cannot know what Iran would look like today had the JCPOA survived. But listening to Rouhani, someone whom hardliners and elements of the IRGC increasingly treated as an adversary from within—0, it is difficult not to ask the question: What if? #iran
Hassan Rouhani, a former president and top security hand in the Islamic Republic, once more talking sense. Just compare this to all the nonsense sprouted out by clueless tankie-ish people (like Dabashi, Ghamari-Tabrizi or Bastani) and see the difference. Who understands Iran better?
49
97
20
469
92,690
Timely reminder of what we owe to the skill of Polish fighter pilots during WW2 - Poles who were slaughtered by Nazis, betrayed and butchered by Stalin, occupied by the Soviets for half a century yet somehow have been able to recover their dignity, pride and nationhood.
It was Fighter Command’s worst day of the Battle of Britain. It was also the day Britain finally unleashed the Poles! On August 31, 1940, the Luftwaffe hammered airfields across southeast England. Fighter Command lost 39 aircraft, 31 in the air and eight on the ground. Ten pilots were killed or fatally wounded. That afternoon, No. 303 Polish Squadron flew its first operational combat patrol. Its pilots claimed four "One-O-Nine" destroyed and two more probably destroyed. They had already fought over Poland and France, but language barriers and British doubts about their readiness had kept them waiting. Forty-two days later, No. 303 had been officially credited with 126 victories, the highest claimed total of any Fighter Command squadron during the battle. The precise wartime tally remains debated. Their extraordinary impact does not! 🎬 Video excerpt from Battle of Britain (1969), directed by Guy Hamilton. Follow @Vanguard_WW2 for more extraordinary WWII stories.
1
20
1,356