President: Sustainable Population Australia Corporate Analyst, | retweet or follow does not mean endorsement | 11 years working in Africa, PNG & London

Perth
Joined January 2012
Peter Strachan retweeted
There it is, ladies and gentlemen. The Economist has finally published a graph on migrant crime levels. I’m sure the usual suspects will be absolutely furious to discover that the data has once again refused to cooperate with their preferred narrative.
29
104
14
569
12,794
Thailand's GDP per person is now >5 times that of the Philippines.
Imagine how much worse the poverty today in Thailand if they hadn't taken (ethical) measures to allow people to control fertility...
2
11
356
Wealth per person has boomed in Thailand after it reduced TFR through 70s and 80s
1
10
Peter Strachan retweeted
Replying to @Peter_Strachan
Australia already has about enough infrastructure for 28m people. We could just pay the costs associated with maintaining & updating that level of infrastructure. Instead we have to help pay for the infrastructure that is only needed because we have endless mass immigration.
1
4
74
Who knew! Importing care workers for the aged cohort costs taxpayers and requires additional infrastructure! Power, water, transport, roads, sewerage, accommodation, healthcare.
Replying to @Peter_Strachan
Yes. The IGR makes clear that high migration will only limit - not stop - increases in the median age & health/aged care costs as a share of GDP. So the issue is the trade-off between how much it curbs health/aged care cost per worker vs the extra infrastructure cost per worker.
1
17
379
Peter Strachan retweeted
Mass immigration is an asset sale... of our quality of life. Anything to prop up the GDP figure.
Asset sales, population growth & debt now prop up the Australian economy. None of these things are sustainable & all come with massive repercussions.
13
2
110
980
GDP measures everything except things that matter for humans, like clean air/water, a healthy ecosystem, and access to places for quiet contemplation.
Population growth can boost GDP- but that does NOT mean it's good for the "economy" when you analyse it from a resilience, sustainability & per capita outcome perspective. The idea that GDP adequately reflects the state of the economy/the nation is a seriously bad one.
2
8
27
406
Peter Strachan retweeted
Bigger populations expose us to greater risk of food scarcity. Smaller populations are not only healthier, ... but safer! population.org.au/say_no_big…
The probability of a calorie deficit in 2027/28 is rising
3
14
338
Peter Strachan retweeted
That mass immigration is good for the economy has become an article of blind faith* among our political/economic class. *An article of faith (or blind faith) is an unquestioning belief or conviction accepted as true without requiring logical proof, empirical evidence, or critical reasoning. It represents a core tenet that a person holds purely on trust, authority, or tradition.
1
3
37
484
I'd be member number 2! 😁
Just for the record: I'm in possibly the world's smallest club: "The environmentalists who acknowledge the role human numbers (population) play in ecological impacts". In fact, most of the vitriol I receive, ... is from "environmentalists".
1
6
133
With positive feedback dominating, the human population surged from 1 billion in ~1815 to 8 billion in 2022. This unprecedented eight-fold population ‘boom’ was accompanied by a >100-fold increase in real gross world product, all on a finite, non-growing planet. substack.com/home/post/p-221…
3
2
225
Japan’s population is declining at an accelerating rate. Japan conducts a census every five years and first saw a drop in population in 2015. By the 2020 census, it had fallen a further 0.7%. The 2025 census showed a 2.5% decline, to 122,972,528 people, 3.2 million fewer than in 2020. And yet, Japan seems to be doing better economically and in terms of providing social services and maintaining social harmony than countries like Canada that use mass immigration to grow their economy. There might be a lesson in there somewhere. nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02…
1
5
7
87
Interesting to consider how the loss of 10% of its working age men, resulting from its invasion of Ukraine, impacts the Russian economy.
5
9
454
Peter Strachan retweeted
And costs the rest of country. A classic example of privatised profit and socialised costs.
1
1
5
43
Peter Strachan retweeted
inner city woke lefty’s are at a weird position currently where they like their low/mid density neighbourhood in Newtown ect and don’t want high rise and new development to support our rapidly increasing immigration rates….but they also don’t want to reduce immigration. They’re going to have to pick their poison at some stage
Amazing how NIMBYs are never against more housing... they just want it somewhere else smh.com.au/national/nsw/a-sy…
17
11
2
126
2,976
Peter Strachan retweeted
Yes,… good work David. All those issues have the support the the majority of Australian voters. Real democracy would acknowledge this. Same goes for the majority wanting much lower immigration. Another thing All Australian Governments have ignored for decades.
2
9
93
At 27%, Australia has the highest share of international students of any major developed nation Given pressures on housing availability and cost, as well as wages and entry-level jobs, does this industry offer any real net benefit?
27
43
1
176
2,139