PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews) header
PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews) profile picture

| British

England
Joined May 2024
Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)Photo by PrimroseViews (@PrimroseViews)
PrimroseViews retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Greater Manchester Combined Authority paid nearly £1m to anonymous recipients. • A Manchester Evening News investigation has revealed the Greater Manchester Combined Authority has handed nearly £1 million of public money to anonymous payees since 2024. • The payments, listed in public accounts for consultancy, professional fees, grants and other services, include little detail on the specific work or who received the cash. A £210,000 capital grant to a developer in June 2026 was redacted, which the authority later blamed on human error. • Another £14,900 consultancy payment in May 2026 had the recipient’s name redacted and no record of the service provided. Any payment of £500 or more is published, with records dating back to 2018. • Reform UK councillor Sian Astley called for greater clarity, describing it as strange that taxpayers cannot know who received a £210,000 grant or other redacted sums. • The GMCA said it redacts personal names in line with data protection rules and the local government transparency code, keeps the system under review, and will correct the mistaken redaction.
5
42
2
71
1,596
PrimroseViews retweeted
The £1m 'secret payments 💸 An MEN investigation uncovers how Greater Manchester Combined Authority handed nearly £1m of public money to anonymous payees - including a £210,000 developer grant blamed on "human error" and thousands in rent paid to a hidden landlord. We trawled through hundreds of payments since 2024 and discovered a combined total of nearly £1m has gone to anonymous beneficiaries over the last three years manchestereveningnews.co.uk/…
27
252
27
381
15,580
PrimroseViews retweeted
It is frankly very worrying that Labour is granting energy firms access to everyone's tax records. This information will invariably fall into the wrong hands and be used for criminal and other nefarious purposes. It's not just tax information but also child benefit records, property valuations, and benefits and pension records that will be made available to countless people in multiple energy companies. This is a very bad plan.
78
385
33
1,112
29,404
PrimroseViews retweeted
Now look at where this comes from … In Moldova, the UN has build a system using household income and government databases to calculate energy subsidies. Britain has reported its fuel poverty policies to the UN as part of implementing Agenda 2030. So we’re moving towards a system where your energy bill could depend not on what you use, but on what the state knows about your finances. I have been warning you. It’s time to pay attention 🔥
57
1,100
29
2,201
30,534
🚨Labour’s Bill Would Let Energy Firms Dig Into Your Tax Records and House Value So They Can Charge You Extra to Subsidise Others Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh introduced the Energy Independence Bill last week that would hand energy companies access to eight government databases, including your HMRC tax and income records, child benefit, property value and pensions. This is a major expansion beyond the limited fuel-poverty data they already get. Official assessments openly plan “progressivity”: discounts for some households paid for by extra levies on those judged better off. Nothing happens until the bill passes and ministers create a scheme through further legislation. Her department calls it targeting support. The unmistakable purpose is giving private firms the power to inspect your private finances and raise your bill to subsidise everyone else. This is not support. It is a deliberate decision to treat your private tax records and property value as legitimate tools for deciding who gets charged more, then hand that power to private energy companies. Once the machinery exists, Labour will expand it. The only real question is how far they intend to go.
287
818
148
1,473
140,894
PrimroseViews retweeted
For the many UK politicians @UKLabour and journalists @BBC who don't know anything about UK trade, here are the highlights: 1. The UK is now predominantly a service exporter. 57% of UK exports are services, which are not affected by EU 'red tape'. 2. UK goods exports have dropped from almost 70% of our total exports in 1997 to just 43% in 2025. This trend began long before Brexit and is tied to Net Zero mandates, high UK energy prices, and EV mandates. 3. Machinery and transport goods, such as cars and aircraft parts, are 42% of all UK goods exports. This is by far the UK's largest export sector, although it is also falling. It was 50% of UK exports in 2000. But if the UK joins the EU's CBAM, companies in this sector will see their imported material costs rise, making their exports even less competitive. 4. Chemicals are the UK's second-largest export sector. They account for 19% of UK goods exports, but this share is shrinking due to UK and EU energy costs and Net Zero regulations. These will increase if the UK joins the EU ETS. 5. Miscellaneous Manufactures account for 11% of UK goods exports. This is still the UK's third-largest export sector, even though it includes many goods the UK no longer makes because of our high Carbon taxes, which will increase if the UK signs up to the EU's even higher ETS on November 20th. 6. Fuels account for 9% of UK exports. This is still the UK's 4th largest goods export sector, even though the current and previous governments are/were trying to destroy it with bans on new exploration and ultra-high taxes. 7. Material Manufactures account for 8% of UK goods exports. This sector includes iron, steel, aluminium, ceramics, and glass manufacturing - industries that have gone, or are going, out of business in the UK because of high UK energy costs, which will rise if the UK joins the EU ETS. 8. These five sectors make up almost 90% of UK exports. The other 5 industry sectors are insignificant. But the government and our journalists think the UK is New Zealand and that the only goods we export are food and live animals to the EU. We don't! UK food and live animal exports to the EU were just 1.3% of the UK's total exports. 9. The government is about to sacrifice all of the export industries listed above to slightly reduce the IMPORT costs of a handful of Supermarkets, at least two of which are privately owned German companies. These savings will not be passed on to UK shoppers because the government has also increased wages again, and supermarket energy costs will increase if we join the EU's ETS. 10. UK exports of food and live animals will not increase because we are paying farmers to not produce them, this has nothing to do with EU red tape. Instead we are paying farmers to plant trees and wildflowers or plaster their farmland with solar panels. (54% of UK electricity is coming from gas today, 12% from solar and 3% from wind.) 11. Write to your MP and tell him to #StoptheReset. If you don't stop this, don't complain when all of our goods export industries have closed because of EU higher carbon taxes, EU higher carbon import tariffs, and the cost of complying with the EU's new packaging and process regulations.
225
2,099
220
4,691
295,606
PrimroseViews retweeted
They circle above and then swoop in on the hated prey. ‘Nothing to do with VAT.’ Never ever have I seen more adults so desperate to ignore and deny the truth. And that truth denies children education, teachers and staff jobs, families a community and the whole of the UK an architectural fabric. That’s just the surface. Underneath lies the ‘unintended consequences’ of state schools forced to carry the new ‘burden.’ The politics of envy that ended with the politics of destruction for all. And ‘adults’ try to defend it. Is it any wonder these crass, grotesque policies keep being pushed through? Because the crass push them.
Nothing to do with the VAT - private school numbers have been in decline for more than a decade (due to birthrate) - almost every one that has closed has had financial issues from before Covid. How Labour's VAT raid led to closure of a 135-year-old private school dailymail.com/news/article-1… via @DailyMail
8
33
1
131
2,617
PrimroseViews retweeted
UK exports to the EU are up 22% since 2019, with exports to non EU up 29%. We export more to non EU than EU, we export more services than goods. UK goods exports to EU are under 6% of our GDP, not the key to UK growth.
77
581
22
1,738
26,123
PrimroseViews retweeted
“The reset talks are a national shame, an exercise in collective humiliation. The Government is not going into them with a series of demands to be traded against EU demands. Rather, it is going in determined to expiate the sin of the 2016 referendum, to atone, to agree to whatever is put in front of it, and then to claim that such agreement was its own plan all along. Eurocrats have clocked it. They smell our negotiators’ misery, their embarrassment, their longing for absolution. They have understandably upped their own demands in response, ordering Britain to hand over cash, fish, sovereignty and self-respect.” Paywall down. telegraph.co.uk/gift/0fa19b6…
93
478
32
1,253
43,951
PrimroseViews retweeted
Point 66 gets to the EU’s main aim in its protectionist policies: the EU wants the UK to help protect the EU’s steel industries with a quota system under the WTO GATT process. This ‘reciprocal’ arrangement has two massive holes. 1. The UK hardly makes any steel any more. It is down to just 2 blast furnaces, and they are only still operating because of massive government subsidies, while the EU has 47 blast furnaces and hundreds of Electric Arc Furnace steelworks which run on much cheaper industrial electricity than the UK’s. So agreeing to Point 66 would simply result in the final death of UK steelmaking. 2. The EU has defied the WTO CODEX rules and has ignored a myriad of complaints to the WTO after the EU lowered its pesticide Maximum Residue Levels, and its banning of certain food ingredients and packaging materials without any scientific evidence to back up its changes. The EU is happy to cherry-pick which WTO rules it wants to obey and which it wants to ignore, but now the EU wants to use the WTO to block Chinese EV and steel imports while the EU is simultaneously defying the WTO CODEX rules and blocking imports of fruit, vegetables, and cereals from other countries. I should point out that if the UK is silly enough to let the EU make its SPS rules, the UK will also be defying WTO CODEX rules. However, the UK would still have a steel industry and would not fear being undercut by Chinese steel if it had encouraged investment in new steel plant and equipment rather than making steel production uneconomic through short-sighted carbon taxes, bans on coking coal extraction, and high industrial electricity prices making EAFs uneconomic in the UK. For more information about the 'Reset' read my latest Substack, catherinemcbride.substack.co…
9
176
11
339
9,859
🚨 IN BLACK AND WHITE: Labour confirms councillors will have NO automatic right to call planning applications before Planning Committees. In a Parliamentary answer to Sir James Cleverly MP, Planning Minister Matthew Pennycook confirmed that the new national scheme of delegation does not permit councillors to directly call applications in for committee consideration. This raises serious questions about local democratic accountability and the ability of elected representatives to secure scrutiny of controversial developments. When residents object to a planning application, what route will their councillors have to ensure their concerns are heard? Labour must answer this question.
7
43
5
87
3,827
AN ABSOLUTE BETRAYAL OF DEMOCRACY. 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union. That democratic decision should mean something. Now Andy Burnham appears to be entertaining arrangements that could bring us back under EU rules through the back door, without giving the electorate a proper say. This is exactly the sort of political manoeuvring that destroys public trust. You cannot claim to respect democracy while looking for ways to sidestep the biggest democratic mandate in a generation. The British people voted to take back control. That decision must be respected, not quietly undermined. TOTAL BETRAYAL OF THE ELECTORATE. 🇬🇧
606
739
60
1,905
38,407
Goodness, this onslaught of EU / UK love posts is so pathetic. Are we falling for it yet? They love us, they didn’t mean to be so mean, please come back. It’s an abusive relationship that must never be returned to.
Really nice to meet the new UK Ambassador to the EU @CWilson_FCDO and have a great exchange of views on EU–UK relations. Lots of common ground and exciting opportunities to strengthen our partnership. Looking forward to working together!
1
39
PrimroseViews retweeted
What a disgrace our Labour leaders are, particularly Burnham. The PM is so desperate for EU ‘reset’ he appears willing to pay almost any price, however extortionate, damaging or demeaning. Absolutely shameless. Britain voted to leave the sclerotic, small-minded EU… not to become its cash machine. Meanwhile, we are drowning in debt, the welfare bill is out of control and ferociously high taxes are crushing prosperity. The immigrant invasion is ongoing. Last week, the Chancellor had a perfect opportunity to jolt some life into the flatlining economy. What does he do? waltz off to the EU to give away millions and millions for nothing, knowing full well that we as a country voted to pay not a single penny more to the EU and to remain independent of it at any cost. What about democracy? Why can't we have a leader on our side? What idiots voted Labour. What a traitor. thesun.co.uk/news/40919867/p…
66
330
6
592
5,554
Let’s see how No 10 North is getting on. Oh, yes. FIFTY jobs currently being recruited. A “rewiring the state deputy director”. What on earth is that?!? These 50 jobs - just a tiny £2.8 million salary bill (EXCLUDING pensions). Almost £1,000 for a replica No 10 door. £1,700 on CUTLERY. For “hospitality reasons” of course! NO ONE voted for this. It’s NOTHING more than a vanity project. Burnham will crash and burn sooner rather than later. Will taxpayers get a refund? Of course they won’t. UNFORGIVABLE.
76
680
17
2,008
20,124
PrimroseViews retweeted
How predictable, and how predicted thetimes.com/uk/transport/ar…
90
171
28
664
92,439
Burnham using taxpayer funded jet to make sure he and his wife can watch Everton. Shocking.
TIMELINE: The Private Jet Flights That Meant Burnham Could Watch the Everton Game order-order.com/2026/11/06/t…
3
66
PrimroseViews retweeted
TIMELINE: The Private Jet Flights That Meant Burnham Could Watch the Everton Game Thanks to @andyburnham going to Manchester on Thursday and watching the Everton game, three additional private jet flights took place at taxpayers expense .And that’s ignoring the old ‘you could take the train’ argument… order-order.com/2026/11/06/t…
23
355
18
654
7,213
PrimroseViews retweeted
Official figures showed UK exports up significantly in real terms, GDP per head up & business investment up since the Referendum, with millions more people in work. (08/10/26) x.10101.uk/c.php?u=https%3A%…
4
1
10
296