M (@Qrypt0s) profile picture
Joined December 2017
Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)Photo by M (@Qrypt0s)
M retweeted
Securitize CEO @carlosdomingo argues the Binance hack actually makes the case for decentralized blockchains, not against them: "Somebody from an anti-crypto lobby group said this is a reason we should ban crypto. My point was that the network itself was not hacked." "The hack happened in the centralized entity that sits on top of it, the same way many traditional finance companies have been hacked." "Ethereum, Solana, the network itself has never been hacked." "Tokenization on a fully decentralized network is actually safer than putting things on a database, because a database is a single point of failure." @Securitize
There was no blockchain hack at all, it was a centralized exchange like if Capital One or JPM or Equifax were hacked (oh wait they were all hacked in the past) and with tokenized stocks properly issued are permissioned assets so a hacked like this will have never happened so your comments is completely out of context.
5
8
2
38
5,933
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
3,184
30,693
2,545
94,702
3,750,417
“What ‘multiculturalism’ boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture—and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture.” — Thomas Sowell
94
1,188
68
6,460
2,946,934
Defend the USA. Destroy the DSA.
582
7,730
173
66,690
611,188
M retweeted
"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.
JUST IN: S&P just launched its first ever crypto index and Bitcoin isn't in it. CEO Kathy Clay says $BTC was excluded because "it's really not one of those revenue generating protocols" The index holds 18 tokens led by $ETH, $BNB, $SOL, $TRX, and Hyperliquid.
20
73
3
425
39,886
"Diversity, equity and inclusion" is classic Marxist doublespeak. "How can you oppose diversity?" "What is wrong with an equitable society?" "Don't you value inclusiveness?" As with all Marxist ideologies, the theory and the practice diverge wildly. In theory, DEI sounds virtuous. In practice, it is a racist, sexist, bigoted, discriminatory doctrine that destroys diversity of thought, is wholly inequitable and is exclusionary in the extreme. Marxists gain power by hijacking the meanings of words to serve their own nefarious ends. Don't let them.
253
2,286
70
9,034
122,550
God Bless America
4,259
19,287
2,364
104,322
9,755,855
Replying to @RoKhanna @chamath
why not just raise income tax rates? because your real intent is not to just “provide healthcare”. you’re masking that you are proposing the creation of, for the first time in the 250 years of this American republic, an organized government seizure of private property from citizens. you’re calling it a “wealth tax” or a “billionaires tax” or “millionaires tax” or whatever nom du jour polls well. but at the end of the day, it’s the seizure of private property from citizens by the government. citizens that earned money, paid their fair taxes on those earnings (53% if they live in California) and are now being told they need to hand over after-tax assets because the government has failed to provide promised services with the revenue it’s collected, and are now re-casting their own failure to be a socio-economic inequity that must be justly resolved... a slippery slope that has never gone anywhere good (see economic effects in USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, France and Norway wealth tax etc.) the American founders fled tyranny in Europe and this amazing nation was populated by immigrants (myself and your parents) from around the world not just looking for a “better life” but for a place where they could have freedom from tyrannical governments that can take what they want from private citizens. a great nation borne of property rights, the rule of law, and endowed freedoms to believe, speak, or act. these principles led to the greatest run of innovations, successes, and widespread increase in prosperity, for all citizens, ever seen. the citizens, the individuals, not the institutions, delivered this progress. those who invented, who toiled, who bled, who sacrificed, who took risk and persevered, who led, and who changed the world, are not charlatans, kleptocrats, or oligarchs. they’re what made us all better off. prosperity is a measure of america’s success, not its failure. it is your principle that is so offensive, as evidenced by the broad disdain for your flippant flirtation with the darkest of human fantasy - socialism. you and other neo-socialists have led so many of us to reflect on America’s history and what it is becoming. that now leads so many to consider, so unnecessarily, leaving their homes for a place where everyone stands up to shout down the principle you suggest. because if your ideas are now considered moderate, it’s clear this titanic is sinking. that a “simple tax” of taking assets that have been earned, through toil and tribulation, rightly taxed, and preserved, should now be unjustly seized, is your solution to a problem of obvious government mismanagement and outright fraud, tells us that your true motivation lies not in giving people healthcare but in cutting down success and deleting the system of prosperity and opportunity for all. i don’t care, and neither should anyone else, what the sum total market value of a private citizens private assets might be. it is none of my business and should be none of yours. because, again, once you open that pandora’s box, we might as well study Lord of the Flies … there is literally nothing stopping 51% of citizens demanding that their government go out and seize 100% of the private property of the 49%. want to give healthcare to people in need? do your job and fix healthcare. make it affordable. want to be lazy about it? then do your job lazily and raise income taxes. want to take private property from private citizens who have paid their fair share of taxes and legally earned their property, then honestly declare that it is envy, not inequity, that you strive to resolve…
1,677
5,372
848
38,332
4,479,358
One of the most disingenuous arguments made in crypto against any project is the idea that decentralization is equivalent to counterparty risk. There is an incorrect conflation between a networks ability to process transactions while solving the double spend problem, as a public permissionless network (where your private keys determine ownership), versus the counterparty risk that large holders represent in purchasing power terms. These are not the same thing and conflating them betrays a deep ignorance in the technical details by the people making the argument. Educate yourself instead of making a virtue of ignorance. For example, let's pretend @saylor had 99% of all Bitcoin in his wallet. This would not impact any other wallet on the bitcoin network with regards to cryptographic security or transaction processing/node recognition. Not one micro iota. nein, nada, zip, nil, zero. Now if we want to talk about counterparty risk, we are implicitly talking about purchasing power in fiat terms. That is to say that the counterparty having a large amount can sell into the market can collapse the price by selling a large amount in a short period of time. So when a bitcoin maximalists screams about decentralization (of holdings) what they are really saying is that the counterparty can make price go down in an illiquid market, which is what they are all really obsessed with, namely fiat! There's a deep irony there that should be studied. The takeaway is that when evaluating a digital asset you should study a both the quality of the network to keep your assets secure (actual decentralization) and the distribution of assets on that network to preserve your purchasing power (counterparty risk). I can think of one large holder in the top 10 by market cap that has cryptographically locked their holdings to preclude this selling event that is being postulated. Unfortunately the largest Bitcoin holders do not have such cryptographic escrow mechanics in place, here's looking at you MSTR. I wonder why? Now evaluate your risks accordingly.
Hello @jackmallers Your emergency 🚨 BTC v XRP broadcast was a catalyst for fact spread on X. 🙏 🙏@Ripple, a centralized entity, like Mr. @saylor is using “a” digital asset BUT where is @MicroStrategy escrow? + Lack of respect🫡 to the Ripple fight & win is a HUGE mistake. Shame
28
82
15
354
95,094
One of the benefits of marriage that no one talks about is having someone to help carry the weight of your existence.
5
17
4
211
10,471
Neil, there is a logic flaw in your little aphorism that seems quite telling. Since you and I are part of the Universe, then we would also be indifferent and uncaring. Perhaps you forgot, Neil, that we are not superior to the Universe but merely a fraction of it. Nice day, indeed
The Universe is blind to our sorrows and indifferent to our pains. Have a nice day!
528
7,435
722
48,551
It's incredible how little reflection went into this "America needs a billion Tiger Moms" post, as it totally misunderstands what sort of spirit made the West great, and is just an attempt to replace what remains of that unique spirit with a slavish one A short 🧵👇
The reason top tech companies often hire foreign-born & first-generation engineers over “native” Americans isn’t because of an innate American IQ deficit (a lazy & wrong explanation). A key part of it comes down to the c-word: culture. Tough questions demand tough answers & if we’re really serious about fixing the problem, we have to confront the TRUTH: Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn’t start in college, it starts YOUNG. A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers. A culture that venerates Cory from “Boy Meets World,” or Zach & Slater over Screech in “Saved by the Bell,” or ‘Stefan’ over Steve Urkel in “Family Matters,” will not produce the best engineers. (Fact: I know *multiple* sets of immigrant parents in the 90s who actively limited how much their kids could watch those TV shows precisely because they promoted mediocrity…and their kids went on to become wildly successful STEM graduates). More movies like Whiplash, fewer reruns of “Friends.” More math tutoring, fewer sleepovers. More weekend science competitions, fewer Saturday morning cartoons. More books, less TV. More creating, less “chillin.” More extracurriculars, less “hanging out at the mall.” Most normal American parents look skeptically at “those kinds of parents.” More normal American kids view such “those kinds of kids” with scorn. If you grow up aspiring to normalcy, normalcy is what you will achieve. Now close your eyes & visualize which families you knew in the 90s (or even now) who raise their kids according to one model versus the other. Be brutally honest. “Normalcy” doesn’t cut it in a hyper-competitive global market for technical talent. And if we pretend like it does, we’ll have our asses handed to us by China. This can be our Sputnik moment. We’ve awaken from slumber before & we can do it again. Trump’s election hopefully marks the beginning of a new golden era in America, but only if our culture fully wakes up. A culture that once again prioritizes achievement over normalcy; excellence over mediocrity; nerdiness over conformity; hard work over laziness. That’s the work we have cut out for us, rather than wallowing in victimhood & just wishing (or legislating) alternative hiring practices into existence. I’m confident we can do it. 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
152
689
78
8,100
930,424
BlackRock: "There is no guarantee that Bitcoin's 21 million supply cap will not be changed." 🤷‍♂️ I've been saying this for years: by stopping Bitcoin from scaling its L1, they've created the security budget issue which they're going to solve with additional emission 🪄
JUST IN: $11.5 trillion asset manager BlackRock releases video explaining #Bitcoin.
83
60
24
392
80,926
LIVE on NYSE TV 🎙️ As the Fed meeting begins, tune in for insights on retail sales, @Ripple's new stablecoin and more. teapawt.net/i/broadcasts/1ZkJzRLAZ…
45
524
68
1,622
271,124
9/ The US has the reserve currency. We should be doing everything we can to keep our fiscal house in order in dollar terms, which means cutting the deficit and future expenditures to a sustainable path, not trying to YOLO into an asset that benefits from dollar decline.
1
3
90
10,964
Going off the gold standard was among the stupidest thing we did in human history. The second stupidest thing is replacing it with bitcoin.
606
112
75
1,504
220,479
$XRP That's the tweet.
946
1,138
84
6,796
589,657
Rarely in American politics has a new industry spent so much money, with such apparent impact, as the cryptocurrency business did in the last election. This Sunday, Margaret Brennan reports on the industry's hopes for the new “pro-crypto” administration. 60Minutes.com
1,799
3,756
783
11,771
4,336,273
Some people can’t wait to sell back into the old financial system. Some people want to hold and be part of the new one. Someday it won’t matter. The two will be one.
3
7
63
2,247
THE RETURN OF XRP With XRP overtaking SOL, above $2, and approaching a $120B market cap, allow me to reflect. When I sued the SEC, people assumed I was a huge XRP holder. The truth is, when the @Ripple case was filed, 50% of my net worth was in BTC. Today, it’s 80%. I also had 4X more in ETH than XRP. In sum, XRP was a very small investment. I sued the SEC b/c what it did was wrong. I’m not talking about Ripple. The SEC sues lots of companies. I’m talking about the absurd allegation that XRP itself was illegal, including if acquired by USERS of the XRPL or by people who’d never heard of @bgarlinghouse, @chrislarsensf or Ripple. There were people being paid in XRP. Companies like @Spend_The_Bits and @TapJets used XRP in business applications. There were XRP debit cards. Thousands of people opened a trust line with the XRPL just to send 💰 to others in seconds and for a fraction of a penny. FACTS: In 2014, the @USGAO declared XRP a “virtual currency utilized in a decentralized payment protocol called Ripple.” In 2015, FinCEN declared XRP a virtual currency and told Ripple it must comply with Banking laws. The SEC was provided the details of the settlement and never said a word. On June 13, 2018, SEC enforcement lawyers ✍️ a report on whether XRP was a security under Howey. SEC lawyers DID NOT recommend enforcement. @bgarlinghouse met with Hinman and Clayton multiple times and Garlinghosue complained that XRP and Ripple were living in purgatory b/c BTC and ETH were given clarity in Hinman’s speech but not XRP. Not once did they inform Ripple it was because XRP was a security. In the 2019 FSOC Annual Report, signed by Clayton, XRP, along with BTC, ETH and LTC, were described as virtual currencies gaining in market share. In January 2019, Coinbase met with the SEC, specifically regarding XRP, and notified the SEC that Coinbase had run XRP through its digital assets framework, and some of the best, most experienced securities lawyers in the world had determined XRP NOT a security. But Coinbase would defer to the SEC b/c Coinbase wanted to soon go public and wanted to make sure the SEC was in agreement over XRP. The SEC allowed Coinbase to list XRP in February 2019 and Coinbase began marketing the utility of XRP much more aggressively than Ripple had ever done. In 2019, if you opened up the Coinbase app, you saw the below page.👇 In June 2019, @MoneyGram filed paperwork with the SEC disclosing MoneyGram would be using XRP in its cross border payments business. The SEC knew MoneyGram was selling XRP on Coinbase to the general public. Yet, did nothing. Also, the U.K., Japan, Singapore, Switzerland and the UAE had declared XRP a non-security token. Yet, despite the above, the SEC, on December 22, 2020, claimed ALL XRP were illegal. I sued the SEC b/c gross government overreach is gross government overreach even if it’s 🆚 a company you don’t like. Many turned a blind eye b/c they didn’t like Ripple. To me, it’s like free speech. You have to protect the speech you don’t like. If you don’t, eventually the government may unjustly come after speech or a company you do support. Plus, even if you’re not a fan of Ripple, when you learn the facts surrounding the filing of the Ripple case, it is impossible to credibly say that everything was on the up and up. In fact, it was down right shameful. Disagree? Read the Joe Grundfest letter that I had to threaten the SEC with a second FOIA lawsuit to acquire. 👇 crypto-law.us/wp-content/upl… Although I didn’t own much XRP at the time, when 75K XRP holders joined me and XRP plummeted, I bought more and more. I did so because it felt like it’s what I needed to do to truly be invested in the fight agaisnt the SEC. I may have done all the legal work for free but sometimes you get paid in other ways. Whether you hate XRP or believe it’s a shit coin (and I have friends who do), I’m thrilled for the XRP holders who’ve held this entire time. They’ve went from purgatory to hell and back.🫡
$XRP CLOSES NOVEMBER AT $1.94!💥📈 THE HIGHEST MONTHLY CANDLE IN 8 YEARS!
305
1,515
75
7,000
528,671