Rijen S retweeted
I’m lost for words. This is what peak engineering looks like.
the reactions show exactly why people love Elon
Rijen S retweeted
So, this is what it would have been like if they’d had mobile phones on the Titanic?
Rijen S retweeted
If the person who filmed this clip survived, then there is a hope for everyone on board.
The most recent reports seem to have every single passenger accounted for which is nothing short of a miracle.
🎥 jackaytk4ic on TT
Rijen S retweeted
Трампа освистали в Луизиане - так освистали, что он не слышал собственного голоса. И это - начало грандиозного падения кремлевского агента. Его ненавидят. Его не хотят видеть и слушать. А тут еще сдох его гэбэшный куратор Дарчиев. Внезапно сдох.
Январь близок.
Rijen S retweeted
A rare look at 25 F-117A Nighthawks flying together in a historic formation flyover.
Rijen S retweeted
Video shows a Waymo in San Francisco on I-280 speeding past traffic as the California Highway Patrol performs a traffic break. The Waymo is seen trying to go around the CHP patrol cars, even at one point turning its blinker on. For more information, abc7news.com/19150225/
Rijen S retweeted
Had a reporter reach out asking for thoughts on the Cybertruck cancellation.
Here's my reply and general thoughts
I did launch a petition to stop the discontinuation of Cybertruck. If anything, it was more symbolic to bring Cybertruck owners together. That said, it’s gathered far more signatures that I expected, but as a currently-niche vehicle, the number probably won’t have any impact.
I’ve tried to summarize my thoughts in various ways since the announcement and I think I’ve been able to sum it up. My initial video here: youtu.be/9cHH0oBEZx4
I absolutely do think this is the wrong move for the Tesla brand, and it’s not necessarily because of the removal of an under-performing product, but its a clear symbol of Tesla’s aggression towards transitioning to autonomous vehicles only. If you ask me, it is far too aggressive and I have a growing conviction that, at least in America, the population and legislators are not ready nor interested in autonomous vehicles today en masse. My post here teapawt.net/cybrtrkguy/status/2119… Thus, by making too many too quickly, you risk a “Google Glass” scenario on steroids, where the technology came before the people (and in this case, regulatory bodies too).
Trying to draw a proper comparison, I posted this: "LG is removing all of the HDMI inputs on their new TVs because they all have Netflix built in now. You’ll stream everything in the future anyways.” That’s what it feels like. HDMI ports are extremely useful today and they will be used for years to come. Why remove them now in favor of platform-locked streaming? Odd choice.
As for Elon’s explanation, I don’t have a logical argument to counter his claims— the truck was profitable (his words) and the factory machinery is useful for the Cybercab. That seems to be true. However, the speed at which Musk believes Cybercab should be built doesn’t match up with my pulse on the average American sentiment as stated above.
My understanding breaks when you consider Tesla is about to launch Roadster 2.0, a completely new, separate production line for automotive enthusiasts. Additionally, pickups and smaller cargo transport in the US is an absolutely massive business (contractors, hobbyists, etc), and Musk/Leadership doesn’t seem to see the autonomous-first version of this opportunity, at least anymore. They built the Cybertruck to eventually remove the steering wheel for these industries (and publicly said so), but instead of removing the steering wheel, they’ve opted to go all-in on 1-2 person passenger transport instead of conquering both.
Tesla, as a company, has made itself massively successful by making vehicles that appeal to enthusiasts, in either tech or automotive (and in many cases, both). With their transition to autonomous-only vehicles, they leave those customers behind. I am one of them.
I have my doubts for future support, but not enough to sell my own Cybertruck or recommend others do the same. Tesla has a great track record with servicing their existing, aging lineup, including firmware updates and service technician training for their earliest Model S and X vehicles running nearly 15-year old hardware. That said, Tesla has yet to deliver the service and support for HW3 by way of hardware replacements, but to their credit, they have recently released optimized and updated versions of FSD for HW3 (not exactly their original promise). Because of this, I certainly expect there to be proper support for years to come, but there will be an end to support for my truck at some point in the distant future.
Happy to answer more questions if productive.
My thoughts on Cybertruck in 2019 versus now: teapawt.net/cybrtrkguy/status/2118…
A short summary on the cancellation vs Americans: teapawt.net/cybrtrkguy/status/2118…
Rijen S retweeted
Musk doesn’t want the Cybertruck to go down in history as a flop, and we get it. It’s his truck. He approved the controversial design, hyped it for four years before it shipped, and boasted that 1 million reservations could translate to 5000,000 units a year.
But you can’t run a line at a quarter of capacity, run “10 days only” discounts, pull trims after 173 sales, and sell trucks to your own rocket company, then turn around and tell people demand was never the issue. The data is public. Tesla’s own delivery reports are public.
Our read on what happened is simple. Demand collapsed in 2025 and never came back. Tesla tried every pricing trick it had. When nothing worked, it found a future-facing reason to end it, and now it’s spinning the inevitable end-of-life rush as proof the truck was a hit all along.
Musk loves a big TAM. SpaceX’s IPO filing put its total addressable market at $28.5 trillion, and last month he went further, writing that he sees “a path to SpaceX being worth orders of magnitude more than the current Earth economy.”
So apply the same lens to Tesla. Pickups are one of the biggest and most profitable vehicle markets on the planet. Ford sold 801,525 F-Series trucks in the US last year, GM sold 925,656 Silverados and Sierras combined, and Ram moved 374,059. That’s more than 2.1 million trucks from three automakers, easily north of $100 billion a year at today’s transaction prices.
Robotaxis? Waymo, by far the leader, is doing about 500,000 paid rides a week, and analysts estimated its revenue run rate at roughly $355 million earlier this year. Tesla doesn’t even break out robotaxi revenue and we expect it to be a fraction of Waymo’s.
Maybe that flips one day. But that’s the bet here: Tesla is walking away from a giant market it can sell into today for one that only gets big if autonomy is solved in the next couple of years. Musk has made that exact bet before. He promised a million robotaxis on the road by 2020 and has said unsupervised self-driving was a year away almost every year since 2016. He’s lost every time.
And that rush is real, for what it’s worth. Some people want the last of a weird, genuinely impressive truck. That doesn’t make it a business.
Musk says Cybertruck isn't dying from weak sales — the numbers disagree electrek.co/2026/11/09/musk-… by @fredlambert

















































