RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Replying to @BrysonGray
More engagement farming. Look at the responses. @BrysonGray doesn't engage with those commenting. He intentionally posts controversial topics than rarely engages with anyone. Just clout chasing...
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
“I just hire the best person for the lowest price.”
That is globalist dogma, not Christian stewardship.
You owe loyalty to your household first. Then your local church. Then your town. Then your nation.
If your margin comes from replacing the young men in your congregation with offshore contractors, you have violated First Timothy 5:8 by assisting in the destruction of opportunities for your children and grandchildren.
Hire your descendants, relatives, and the men you sit in the pews with.
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Pharisees: We are Abraham's seed
Christian Zionists: Jews are Abraham's seed
History repeats itself
Unbelieving Jews think their DNA gives them favor and the Abrahamic promises
Jesus says different
He acknowledged their physical DNA: "I know that ye are Abraham's seed..." (John 8:37)
He denied their spiritual right to the family promises: "...If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham." (John 8:39)
The pharisees aren't no different than any unbelieving jew today relying on their DNA to be considered God's people
Furthermore Jesus makes it clear that God the Father isn't their Father because they don't love Him
John 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me
This confirms that if you reject the Son you don't know the Father
1 John 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also
Today we live in a time where satan is deceiving Christians into believing Judaism has the Father and that they worship the Father and Jesus Himself and John reiterates that is simply not true
Simply put Christians are giving heed to a doctrine of devils that Jesus would condemn Himself just like He did when speaking to unbelieving Jews who thought the promises of God applied to them based on being Abraham's seed
The new testament makes it absolutely clear that Abrahamic promises are spiritual not physical and only by faith in Jesus not DNA
Romans 4:16: Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all
Galatians 3:9: So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham
Galatians 3:29: And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise
Romans 4:23-24: Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead
Romans 4:13: For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith
Sadly this truth is completely missed and rejected by many Christians because the enemy has used God's mercy and faithfulness as a guise to bring in a false doctrine to deceive Christians into Christian Zionism
Pray for our brothers and sisters who are deceived by this
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
The same Judaizers thats triggered by this post are the ones crying about sharia law
Christians follow this law because WE have the Spirit of God 👇🏻
“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. ”
Romans 8:2
Deal with it
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Someone said “Normalize shutting off any song or movie that blaspheme the name of Jesus”
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Cancel your News24 subscription. It is a mouthpiece of the globalists at @wef.
#News24MustFall
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Fun Fact: No Christian was foolish enough to call Jesus "Yeshua" until a Judaizing Hebraist named Franz Delitzsch, of Jewish descent, called him that in 1879 as a supposed evangelism strategy to Jews.
Jesus' name is Greek. The angel gave it in Matthew 1:21. Matthew quotes the original language when the word matters, and no word matters more than Jesus' name. And yet, Matthew says His name is Ἰησοῦς.
Not Yeshua.
This is why He's called Ἰησοῦς more than 90 times in the New Testament, and called "Yeshua" exactly zero times. Claiming that it does so because the New Testament is written in Greek does not work - the New Testament preserves Hebrew names most of the time, and when it doesn't, it always explains the original: "Tabitha, that is Dorcas" and "Thomas, called Didymus."
There is no "Jesus, that is, Yeshua." It's just Jesus.
Like half of His disciples, Jesus' name was Greek. The Lexicon of Jewish Names of Antiquity records the names given to Jewish babies in that era, and Jewish parents gave their kids Greek names.
Why? It was Greco-Roman Culture. The Bible of Jesus, the Apostles, and First-century Jews was the Greek Septuagint (LXX). Every New Testament citation from Jesus quotes the LXX. He preferred it, obviously.
Hebrew was dead as a common tongue for hundreds of years. By this point, the Jews had been acclimated to Greek culture for three generations. How many of you are naming your kids in Latin? Few. Because it's dead.
You might have even heard that "Jesus is Greek for Yeshua." No, it isn't. You've been lied to.
First, that implies His name was originally Hebrew, which as you can see above, is incorrect. Second, determining which Hebrew name Ἰησοῦς should translate to is guesswork.
They might as well have pulled Yeshua out of a hat, because aside from Joshua (Yeshua) and Jeshu, Jesus is also translated as Yishwi, Abishua, and Yishwah. If their theory IS correct and Jesus' name is Aramaic or Hebrew, we would have NO IDEA which semitic form it was in, because the Bible doesn't tell us and neither does any written historical record.
So when Delitzsch called Him "Yeshua" in 1879, he might as well have called Him Yishwah. It's all poppycock.
And while the Jews did speak Aramaic (despite reading and speaking Greek), assuming Mary gave Jesus an Aramaic name because they're ethnic Hebrews is like assuming a family whose ancestors are from Mexico that has lived and multiplied inside America for a century must name their kid Juan instead of John. The logic does not follow.
It's called "assimilation" and the God-Man who preferred "the Son of Man" over "King of the Jews" was more than satisfied with a Greek name. And God the Father chose it.
Why was Jesus given a Greek name? Gentiles were THE ENTIRE POINT of Jesus coming. God saving Gentiles, not Jews, was the BIG REVEAL of Scripture.
Ephesians 3:4-6 says, “Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.”
So while God did plan to save some Jews, their salvation was not the mystery of God gloriously revealed in the gospel. Rather, it was that Gentiles would become heirs of Christ and partakers in Abraham's promise.
Jesus would come to be known as the Savior of the Gentiles. It's only fitting that Jesus should have a Gentile name. After all, Christ is OUR King.
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
Not a single peep from the media about South Africa's latest farm attack during which tannie Hannetjie van Zyl was murdered.
Where are all the GBV activists all of a sudden?
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
All it took to convince these men to turn on their people, culture, and family was a 30 minute power point presentation on why nationalism is bad.
They don't deserve your respect.
RankRancid{RRR} retweeted
🌐🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom
As London plunges into the abyss of invasion with real-life terrorist attacks and teenage recruitment, British police brilliantly demonstrate their priorities: heroically arresting a white child for fishing in the Thames.
..... a child with a fishing rod is a direct threat to national security?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This video is from May 2025 in Cumbria not London or the Thames. Cumbria Police responded to a report of a youth in a camouflage jacket threatening someone with a knife. The boys were handcuffed during a search but no knife was found. They were not arrested for fishing.
reuters.com/fact-check/boy…
facta.news/antibufale/reg…























