Raptor

I genuinely don’t want to criticize a competitor during their crisis. What I really want is for us to work together with them to raise security standards and better protect the entire crypto industry. But I have to say, the interview with the “richest man in crypto,” who claims he no longer runs Binance (do you really believe that?), made me sick. The interview was full of bullshits. It was misleading, appeared to downplay their own responsibilities, and attempted to discredit traditional banks to make excuses for their own failures. Instead of demonstrating accountability and leadership during a crisis, the interview seemed more focused on deflecting responsibility and shifting blame. This is not the kind of leadership our industry needs. Since the incident, the “richest man in crypto” seems unable to stop making noise: 1. He has arguably been the most vocal individual associated with Binance on social media throughout this crisis. 2. He has found time to argue with Elon Musk @elonmusk over SpaceX stock investments. 3. He keeps emphasizing that “only 2%” of funds have left Binance, as if that somehow addresses the underlying security concerns. 4. Marketing campaigns to attract new deposits have continued amid the crisis. 5. He has tried to suggest that traditional banks have weaker security. How can someone claiming to be a professional crypto industry leader make such a misleading comparison? The threat models, attack surfaces, and consequences are fundamentally different. Comparing the two without that context is irresponsible. 6. And almost every time he speaks, he appeared to leave a pregnant woman on the front line and adds the same disclaimer: “I don’t run Binance.” Meanwhile, the entire crypto industry is suffering the consequences: 1. Bitcoin reportedly fell from around $81,000 to $75,000 during the turmoil. 2. Billions of dollars in leveraged positions were liquidated amid the market disruption. 3. The incident has potentially damaged the credibility of the entire crypto industry in the eyes of traditional capital markets, institutional investors, and global regulators. And after all this, their so-called “multi-layer security defense” is looking increasingly like a joke. A friend sent me photos of Halloween costumes that they came across. I’m sharing them here. The satire speaks for itself. Our industry needs fewer excuses, less PR spin, and more genuine collaboration to protect users and strengthen security standards. That is what I would rather spend my time building together—even with our competitors.

很多包装和表演最后都被证明就是个草台班子！ 据报道，一起涉及 63亿美元 的安全事件，竟然始于一名员工落入虚假招聘面试陷阱，随后波及另外两名员工，内部 AI 工具也可能被卷入其中。这就是所谓的“多层纵深防御”？ 我不想对竞争对手的安全控制失效做过多揣测。 但我想提醒每一位加密行业用户：在加密行业，过度以营销为导向的企业文化，可能是极其危险的。 你可能在意的是多几个百分点的理财收益，或者一些营销活动的奖励。但黑客和诈骗分子盯上的，是你100%的本金。 在加密行业，安全、责任和合规，永远应该排在营销之前。 再高的收益、再诱人的活动奖励，都无法弥补本金损失带来的伤害。 选择那些真正把保护你的资产放在第一位，而不只是想方设法吸引你资产的平台。