KiwiCrypto

That's better

@prism_launch If a vamp launches through Prism, u can route it and pool the fees But if a clone is launched on a diff launchpad, Prism can’t force their fees into the pool... So “vamp protection” only works if ppl also create the vamp inside Prisms launchpad right??

NFTs Users can now launch tokens paired with supported NFT collections, giving communities a way to build markets around the collections they actually care about while keeping everything inside the same IPO launch flow. From there, holders can decide how the treasury evolves over time and what the community wants to build around that exposure. This is the first update of the day and, in our opinion, the smallest one. We have a lot more planned as the day goes on, with each update getting progressively bigger. Stay tuned. ipo.cash

IPO is now live across every major chain. This is the first live proof of concept confirming that our crosschain engine works as intended, keeping the same token connected across all networks instead of splitting it into isolated markets. The raise will be fully refunded to every depositor once it closes, as all required liquidity was provided by us. One token. Every chain. LIVE CONTRACTS: Original IPO on Robinhood Chain: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… LayerZero OFT Adapter: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… IPO OFT on Base: basescan.org/address/0x1aE93… IPO OFT on BNB Chain: bscscan.com/address/0x1aE933… The original IPO contract and its one billion token supply remain unchanged on Robinhood Chain. When IPO moves to Base or BNB, the original tokens are locked inside the LayerZero adapter and exactly the same amount is minted on the destination chain. When those tokens return, the destination tokens are burned and the originals are unlocked. This keeps every token backed 1:1 and prevents the separate chains from creating additional global supply. Base and BNB may currently display a market cap of roughly $298 because their trackers only multiply the price by the approximately 500,000 IPO presently bridged to that specific chain. That is the local bridged supply, not IPO’s global supply. The correct global valuation uses the original fixed supply of one billion IPO. LIVE LIQUIDITY: Base at Aerodrome: basescan.org/tx/0x8576aa40a3… BNB Chain at PancakeSwap: bscscan.com/tx/0xe5426f66089… Solana is still being tested and should be ready very, very soon. The other chains in the rollout are EVM based, so Solana requires a bit more work to integrate and sync properly. We wanted to get the EVM rollout live first so everyone could see the engine working in production while we finish the final Solana testing. You may also see prices deviate by around 10–20% between chains initially. These deployments are brand new and liquidity is still relatively shallow, so some divergence is expected. As liquidity deepens and more arbitrage bots and traders begin moving between markets, those gaps will tighten considerably over time. Enjoy. ipo.cash

IPO is now live across every major chain. This is the first live proof of concept confirming that our crosschain engine works as intended, keeping the same token connected across all networks instead of splitting it into isolated markets. The raise will be fully refunded to every depositor once it closes, as all required liquidity was provided by us. One token. Every chain. LIVE CONTRACTS: Original IPO on Robinhood Chain: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… LayerZero OFT Adapter: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… IPO OFT on Base: basescan.org/address/0x1aE93… IPO OFT on BNB Chain: bscscan.com/address/0x1aE933… The original IPO contract and its one billion token supply remain unchanged on Robinhood Chain. When IPO moves to Base or BNB, the original tokens are locked inside the LayerZero adapter and exactly the same amount is minted on the destination chain. When those tokens return, the destination tokens are burned and the originals are unlocked. This keeps every token backed 1:1 and prevents the separate chains from creating additional global supply. Base and BNB may currently display a market cap of roughly $298 because their trackers only multiply the price by the approximately 500,000 IPO presently bridged to that specific chain. That is the local bridged supply, not IPO’s global supply. The correct global valuation uses the original fixed supply of one billion IPO. LIVE LIQUIDITY: Base at Aerodrome: basescan.org/tx/0x8576aa40a3… BNB Chain at PancakeSwap: bscscan.com/tx/0xe5426f66089… Solana is still being tested and should be ready very, very soon. The other chains in the rollout are EVM based, so Solana requires a bit more work to integrate and sync properly. We wanted to get the EVM rollout live first so everyone could see the engine working in production while we finish the final Solana testing. You may also see prices deviate by around 10–20% between chains initially. These deployments are brand new and liquidity is still relatively shallow, so some divergence is expected. As liquidity deepens and more arbitrage bots and traders begin moving between markets, those gaps will tighten considerably over time. Enjoy. ipo.cash

I dont think ppl understand $IPO ipo.cash is way bigger than another token launchpad This is the infrastructure for launching projects that are investment vehicles where each launched token has an actual treasury that owns real assets voted on directly by holders

The flywheel is now active. A TWAP has started using 100% of fees generated by $IPO itself to continuously buy back $IPO from the open market. On top of that, from this point forward, 10% of fees generated by every token launched through IPO will also be routed into $IPO buybacks. More launches means more volume, more fees and more persistent buy pressure flowing back into the native token.

The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened. Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot. We welcome a federal framework that sets consistent safety requirements for frontier AI. But we do not believe we need to wait for an anti-trust exemption or legislation to begin the work of providing this confidence. Consistent rules to manage frontier risk so that we can maximize the benefits are a good idea (and we are excited by ideas like independent auditors). Years ago, companies like ours developed things like Responsible Scaling Policies and Preparedness Frameworks. Those were good for that moment, and focused primarily on the deployment of completed models, not what happens during their development process. Today's shift to focusing on safe development and evaluation will need new tools. For example, at OpenAI we now formulate explicit safety cases in advance of frontier reinforcement learning runs we expect to significantly increase capability, in addition to the safety work we have long done in advance of model releases. We hope that other companies will learn from our approaches and propose their own; we think shared standards for misalignment, monitoring, and safety will lead to better outcomes. We look forward to collaborating with our colleagues across the industry to formulate the best version of these. When we talk about “pacing”, we do not mean “stopping”. Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be; interventions like safety cases and monitoring have significant costs. Pacing will be well worth this cost; no amount of American competitive pressure should justify recklessness, or let capabilities get ahead of alignment and monitoring. Where we will need the help of our government is for international coordination. But first we should do what we can ourselves.