lol, found a buried gem from the diss: "Kosinski's creation, which I annotated with a hearty 'Wat' on Twitter..." Twitter meta in academic writing ☠️
Another day, again beaten out for another TT gig by someone already years into a TT position. I'm excited to see their former university offer a 4/4, one year position paying $25k and never open another tenure line. 🙃🙃🙃
1
Looks like it's "I got tenure/I got a shiny new job, there's nothing wrong with the academic job system" o-clock on the Twitter feed
2
If I wanna be half the shitposter that Diogenes was, I really have to start training up. Any suggestions?
1
Can anyone explain to me why I'm writing a book when I'm probably not going to have long-term employment in academia? And almost definitely not a position that would care about me having a book? Sure isn't the huge piles of cash from academic publications!🤔🤔🤔
Rush Limbaugh's passing is the perfect time to activate the burner acct to like all the posts that might get me tossed out by a search committee if I liked em on main
2
Oh yeah, that vibe when you find out who got a job over you because they followed you on Twitter out of the blue
1
Is it too salty to add to my annual review, "I'd get a hell of a lot more done if I didn't have to spend all year applying to, interviewing for, and ultimately not receiving offers for a tenure track job?" Eh, who cares, did it anyway.
2
Holy shit. I have to resurrect this account just to marvel at something I noticed in a job post: they're asking for SNAIL MAIL JOB MATERIALS. IN 2020. "Please mark ‘Application for Communication Studies position’ on the envelope." LOLOLOL
1
4
"I don't even know where I'm going with this." This message brought to you by the stereotypical not-question in Q&A.
Science doesn't recognize contingency.. but you know what does? Yeah, you guessed it, rhetoric! Our Deus ex Machina!




