Pinned Tweet
Replying to @Bubblebathgirl
If you Brits don't want to put up with this outrage, what John Locke says in The Second Treatise of Government should be the starting point for your thought, Part One (1,689 words)
From Chapter II, “Of the State of Nature”
§4. To understand political power [aright], and derive it from its original [= source], we must consider what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature; without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man.
A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction [= scope of authority] is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident than that creatures of the same species and rank [= degree of dignity], promiscuously [= indiscriminately] born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection….
§6. But though this be a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of licence: though man in that state have an uncontrollable [= not subject to anyone’s command or rule] liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession, but [= except] where some nobler use than its bare [= mere] preservation calls for it.
The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign Master, sent into the world by his order, and about his business; they are his property, whose workmanship they are, made to last during his, not another’s pleasure: and being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed [to exist] any such subordination among us that may authorize us to destroy another, as if we were made for one another’s uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for ours.
Every one, as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his station [= his divinely appointed existence] wilfully, so by the like reason, when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice to an offender, take away or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.
§7. And that all men may be restrained from invading others’ rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of nature is, in that state, put into every man’s hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation: for the law of nature would, as all other laws that concern men in this world, be in vain, if there were nobody that in the state of nature had a power to execute that law, and thereby preserve the innocent, and restrain offenders.
And if anyone in the state of nature may punish another for any evil he has done, everyone may do so: for in that state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction [= authority] of one over another, what any may do in prosecution of that law everyone must needs have a right to do.
§8. And thus, in the state of nature, ‘‘one man comes by a power over another”; but yet no absolute or arbitrary power to use [= deal with] a criminal, when he has got him [the criminal] in his hands, according to the passionate heats or boundless extravagancy of his own will; but only to retribute to him, so far as calm reason and conscience dictate, what is proportionate to his transgression; which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint: for these two are the only reasons why one man may lawfully do harm to another, which is that [which] we call punishment.
In transgressing the law of nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men for their mutual security; and so he becomes dangerous to mankind, the tie, which is to secure them from injury and violence, being slighted and broken by him: which being a trespass against the whole species, and the peace and safety of it, provided for by the law of nature; every man upon this score, by the right he hath to preserve mankind in general, may restrain, or, where it is necessary, destroy things noxious to them, and so may bring such evil on anyone, who hath transgressed that law, as may make him repent the doing of it, and thereby deter him, and by his example others, from doing the like mischief. And in this case, and upon this ground, ‘‘every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be executioner of [= have the authority to enact and enforce] the law of nature.’’
From Chapter III, “Of the State of War”
§ 16. The state of war is a state of enmity and destruction: and therefore declaring by word or action, not a passionate and hasty, but a sedate, settled design upon another man’s life, puts him [the aggressor] in a state of war with him against whom he has declared such an intention, and so [he, the aggressor,] has exposed his life to the other’s power to be taken away by him [the person under threat], or any one that joins with him in his defence, and espouses his quarrel; it being reasonable and just, I should have a right to destroy that which threatens me with destruction....
One may destroy a man who makes war upon him, or has discovered an enmity to his being [= made evident his intent against the other's life], for the same reason that he may kill a wolf or a lion; because such men are not under the ties of the common law of reason [= that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions] [because they] have no other rule but that of force and violence, and so may be treated as beasts of prey, those dangerous and noxious creatures, that will be sure to destroy [anyone] whenever [they fall] into their power.
§ 17. And hence it is, that he who attempts to get another man into his absolute power, does thereby put himself into a state of war with him; it being to be understood as a declaration of a design upon his life: for I have reason to conclude, that he who would get me into his power without my consent, would use [= treat] me as he pleased when he got me there, and destroy me too when he had a fancy to it....
§ 18. This makes it lawful for a man to kill a thief, who has not in the least hurt him, nor declared any design upon his life, any farther than, by the use of force, so to get him in his power [= to get him sufficiently into his power], [so] as [to be in a position] to take away his money, or what he pleases, from him; because using force, where he has no right, to get me into his power..., I have no reason to suppose, that he, who would take away my liberty, would not, when he had me in his power, take away everything else. And therefore it is lawful for me to treat him as one who has put himself into a state of war with me, i.e. kill him if I can; for to that hazard [= risk] does he justly expose himself, whoever introduces a state of war, and is aggressor in it.
§ 19. Men living together according to reason (cf. §§6, 16), without a common superior [= an established executive, legislative, and judicial apparatus in which a magistrate, the executive superior, has sole, universally recognized authority to use force to protect citizens’ or subjects’ property, rights, persons, and lives against enemies foreign and domestic] on earth, with authority to judge between them, is [what is] properly [understood to be] the state of nature.
But force, or a declared design of force, upon the person of another, where there is no common superior on earth to appeal to for relief, is the state of war: and it is the want [= lack] of such an appeal [that] gives a man the right of war even against an aggressor, though he be in [an established] society [governed by law], and a fellow subject.
Thus a thief, whom I cannot harm, but [= except] by appeal to the law, for having stolen all that I am worth, I may kill, when he sets on me to rob me but [= only] of my horse or coat; because the law, which was made for my preservation, where it cannot interpose [= intervene] to secure my life from present force, which, if lost, is capable of no reparation, permits me [for] my own defence...a liberty to kill the aggressor, because the aggressor allows not time to appeal to our common judge, nor the decision of the law, for remedy in a case where the mischief may be irreparable.
Want of a common judge with authority puts all men in a state of nature: force without right, upon a man’s person, makes a state of war, both where there is, and is not, a common judge.
Right Reckoner retweeted
Tinkering again with Cavafy, new Ithaka (following the rhythm of the original and translating line-by-line) ending:
Ithaka gave you this: the lovely journey.
Without her you would never have set out,
and she has nothing more to give you now.
And if you find her poor, she’s not deceived you:
you’ll have become so wise, and seen so much,
that you will know by now what Ithakas mean.
Right Reckoner retweeted
The White kid is being attacked from behind by the kid sitting down, and he's trying to go to the front of the bus to get away from the bully.
The bus driver is screaming at the unruly black kid who's part of the commotion; when he settles that mess, the driver turns on the White kid trying to escape and physically attacks him.
Right Reckoner retweeted
Woman gets pulled over for driving in the HOV lane and tries to convince the officer that her dog counts as a second passenger.
When that doesn’t work, she starts belittling the officer, who warns her she could be arrested.
You can disagree with a ticket without being disrespectful. The officer is doing his job. There’s absolutely no reason to treat him that way.
Replying to @joedirt1 @ItsMeGitau
Studies of millions of US criminal records show near-zero systematic misclassification of Blacks as Caucasian (errors minimal and symmetrical). For Hispanics, 22-29% are labeled White in the data examined. Muslims are a religion, not a race; MENA individuals were classified White by federal policy (not error) until recent updates. No solid data supports high "mistaken" rates beyond those patterns.
He shot an 18-year-old honor student in the back of the head. Then 17-year-old Danta Wright sat in court smiling while the victim's mother cried, and told the room: "I'll be home soon."
In the video below, watch him grin through the family's statements, then watch the judge lose it.
In October 2016, Wright and 2 friends tried to rob Jordan Klee, a senior and football player at Pioneer High School in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Wright shot him in the back of the head. Jordan was found dead on a walking path.
At sentencing, Jordan's mother's words were read out loud: "I've lost my only child, my son, my baby, my friend... I no longer have the hope of having grandchildren." Wright smiled, nearly laughed and shook his head.
Judge David Swartz stopped everything. "Watching you sit there, smile, laugh, shake your head like this was no big deal, I'm very tempted to just say I'm not going to accept this sentencing agreement." At trial, he warned, it could be life in prison: "That means you'll die there."
The judge said he had never thrown out a plea deal before. But during the break, Jordan's family asked him not to send the case to trial, because they wanted to move on. His lawyer apologized and said the teen "displays fear by smiling."
He got 23 to 50 years.
1 life taken. 1 smile. 23 years minimum.
Should the judge have ignored the family and sent him to trial for life?
Right Reckoner retweeted
The latest victim of a Black-on-White hate crime killing.
Replying to @NatCon2022
Citibank employee LeAnne Selman, 41, murdered execution style as she begged for her life during attempted mass shooting by Jacob Pearson, 35.
Right Reckoner retweeted
🚨HOLY CRAP!!!!
Video footage has emerged from the midterms of a group of Black women in Michigan BEATING THE HELL out of White women...
...INSIDE A POLLING LOCATION!!!!
WHAT ON EARTH?????!!!!
Right Reckoner retweeted
Marilyn McCoo was a doll! She was such an awesome singer! These two did end up marrying and are still together.
Wedding Bell Blues - The 5th Dimension {Stereo} 1969
Right Reckoner retweeted
I absolutely love Michael McIntyre. This man could make reading a dictionary hilarious😂🤣
And he's got a point! Who in the world decided which letters we should pronounce and which ones we should just pretend aren't there? The English language has more rules, exceptions, and nonsense than a government instruction manual! 🤣
His delivery, his expressions, and that brilliant sense of humor get me every single time! If you can watch this without laughing, you might want to check your funny bone! 😂❤️
tiktok.com/@michaelmcintyre/…
Right Reckoner retweeted
Если бы у неё только был мозг.🤨
Студентка:
Почему вы ведёте себя так, будто рабства никогда не было? Вы делаете вид, что этого не происходило. А сегрегация по законам Джима Кроу? И сегодня чернокожие люди продолжают переживать психологическую травму, видя, как полиция убивает чернокожих мужчин.
Так где же репарации за рабство? Мы ведь не просим денег. Мы просто хотим, чтобы к нам относились на равных. Это было бы неплохо. Мы не требуем от вас денег. Мы просим лишь элементарного соблюдения наших прав. Мы хотим, чтобы нас воспринимали как людей.
Джефф Сквер:
Кто сказал, что рабства не было?
Я бы сказал, что нам постоянно напоминают: мол, 150 лет назад с вами такое сделали, и теперь пришло время...
Студентка:
Да, а ещё Джим Кроу!
Джефф Сквер:
Ну и что? Сколько денег чернокожие получили через систему социальных пособий? Этого более чем достаточно в качестве репараций за рабство.
А где репарации для ирландцев? Где репарации для всех остальных народов, которые пережили рабство и другие ужасы? Сорок процентов населения моей страны были уморены голодом и проданы в рабство Оливером Кромвелем.
К тому же я славянин. Само слово «раб» в английском языке, slave, происходит от слова «славянин»: белых людей тоже обращали в рабство.
Ты рабыня?
Студентка: Нет.
Джефф Сквер:
Так с какой стати я должен отдавать вам свои деньги? Это же безумие!
Студентка: Я не требую денег.
Джефф Сквер:
Ты только что спрашивала, где наши репарации. Значит, ты всё-таки требуешь денег. Ты действительно считаешь, что заслуживаешь моих денег только потому, что я белый?
Ты считаешь, что я должен отдать вам свои деньги лишь на том основании, что я белый?
Послушайте, если вы чернокожий, латиноамериканец, азиат или кто угодно ещё, живущий в этой стране, у вас ровно столько же прав, сколько у меня, белого человека. Вы можете делать всё, что захотите. Вы можете подойти к этому микрофону, свободно высказывать своё мнение, пользоваться свободой слова, и вам за это ничего не будет.
Мы живём в удивительной стране. Да благословит Бог Америку!
God fucking damn if Charles Aznavour ain't the fucking Man! Look at that expression on his face (0:18) as he looks around before he walks up the stairs into the audience—that's one bad motherfucker right there now!
Le Cabotin
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
Je suis né pour jouer
Donnez-moi un tréteau minable et sans chaleur
Je vais me surpasser
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
Mais j'ai ça dans le sang
Donnez-moi quatre planches et quelques spectateurs Et j'aurai du talent,
Du talent
Dans une pièce de trois murs
A ventre ouvert sur le public
Tout comme au bord d'un gouffre obscur
Avec mon trac, avec mes tics
Je viens donner la comédie
Vibrant d'un feu qui brûle en moi
Je parle, je pleure, et je ris
Et vis mon rôle chaque foi
Ne me condamnez pas sans comprendre mon cœur
Je suis d'une autre race
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
La scène est mon espace
Ma vie commence alors
Que je vois le décor
Que j'entends les trois coups
Et je suis malgré moi
Pris de peur et de joie
Quand le rideau se lève
Là, mon cœur bat si fort
Que je frôle la mort
Et que j'en oublie tout
Mais au moment exact
Je fais le premier pas
Pour entrer dans mon rêve
Mon rêve
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
J'ai choisi mon destin
Donnez-moi dix répliques et quelques projecteurs Vous verrez mes moyens
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
Et c'est toute ma vie
Donnez-moi un théâtre, un rôle à ma hauteur
Et j'aurai du génie
Du génie
Sous un maquillage savant
Ou le visage à découvert
Emphatique ou discrètement
Je dis la prose ou bien le vers
Avec tendresse avec fureur
Selon la pièce et puis l'emploi
Je souffre, je vis ou je meurs
Et mens jusqu'à ce que j'y croie
Soit dit sans vanité je connais ma valeur
Et si pour vous peut-être
Je suis un cabotin dans toute sa splendeur
Je reste fier de l'être
Right Reckoner retweeted
Spend it all, says Democritus:
οἱ φειδωλοὶ τὸν τῆς μελίσσης οἶτον ἔχουσιν ἐργαζόμενοι ὡς ἀεὶ βιωσόμενοι.
-
Misers share the fate of the bee, they work as though they were going to live forever.
Fragment 227
Right Reckoner retweeted
Her brain malfunctioned when she heard that
Why do you always get some kind of a panic attack
Right Reckoner retweeted
🎸 “Ticket to Ride”: il giorno in cui i Beatles cambiarono per sempre le regole del rock! 🔥
🎶 Pubblicata nell’aprile del 1965, “Ticket to Ride” rappresenta uno dei momenti più innovativi e importanti nella carriera dei Beatles. Un brano che segnò una svolta nella loro evoluzione musicale, anticipando sonorità che avrebbero caratterizzato il rock degli anni successivi.
🎸 Scritta principalmente da John Lennon, con il contributo di Paul McCartney, la canzone si distingue per il suo ritmo insolito, l’inconfondibile introduzione di chitarra e una batteria potente, dal carattere quasi ipnotico. Un sound decisamente più maturo e sperimentale rispetto ai primi successi dei Fab Four.
🔥 Non a caso, Lennon arrivò a considerarla una delle prime vere canzoni heavy della storia, sottolineando quanto fosse rivoluzionaria per l’epoca.
🥁 Un ruolo fondamentale lo ebbe anche Ringo Starr, con un accompagnamento di batteria originale e sorprendente, lontano dagli schemi tradizionali del beat. Il risultato fu un brano dal suono più deciso, quasi anticipatore dell’hard rock e delle sperimentazioni psichedeliche che sarebbero arrivate negli anni successivi.
📀 Pubblicata come singolo il 9 aprile 1965 nel Regno Unito, “Ticket to Ride” conquistò il primo posto delle classifiche britanniche e americane, confermando lo straordinario successo internazionale del gruppo. Pochi mesi dopo venne inclusa nell’album Help!, colonna sonora dell’omonimo film, il secondo lungometraggio dei Beatles.
✨ Era soltanto il 1965, ma i Fab Four stavano già abbandonando le formule dei primi successi per esplorare territori musicali completamente nuovi.
🎧 A oltre sessant’anni dalla sua pubblicazione, “Ticket to Ride” conserva intatta tutta la sua energia e modernità. Una canzone che non fu soltanto un enorme successo commerciale, ma anche uno dei primi segnali della straordinaria rivoluzione musicale che i Beatles avrebbero realizzato negli anni successivi.
🔊 Alzate il volume e riascoltate “Ticket to Ride”: il futuro del rock cominciava già a farsi sentire!
#Beatles #TicketToRide #Help #JohnLennon #PaulMcCartney #RingoStarr #RockHistory #Yesterdaypills
6 Novembre 2015 ristampa di 1
Il 6 novembre 2015 la compilation “1” dei #Beatles, il disco più famoso del precedente decennio con oltre 30 milioni di copie vendute in tutto il mondo, viene ristampata in diversi formati.
I video delle canzoni vengono inoltre presentati per la prima volta nel formato 4K.
#Beatles #Yesterdaypills





























