Robert Carr retweeted
David Walliams OBE
Rolf Harris CBE
Huw Edwards MBE
Stuart Hall OBE
Sir Jimmy Savile
Sir Cyril Smith
Sir Jeffrey Donaldson
Lord Peter Mandelson
Lord Nazir Ahmed
Lord Greville Janner
Prince Andrew
Anyone see a pattern here?
Robert Carr retweeted
You can’t “have sex” with a twelve-year-old girl.
It’s called RAPING a child.
Hamoud Al-Soaimi was found guilty of 3 counts of sexual assault, including sex with a 12-year-old girl.
He received 180 hours of community service. No jail.
In Newcastle, two vulnerable girls were groomed, passed around, and repeatedly raped.
Hamoud Al-Soaimi was convicted of three counts of sexual assault and one count of assault by penetration. But when he stood up to be sentenced on 1 March 2024, he did not go to prison.
He was given two years, suspended for two years, and 180 hours of unpaid work. He walked out of court a free man.
The media barely reported his sentence. The BBC, who had once made a sympathetic documentary about the Badreddin family as Syrian refugees, went quiet.
The politicians who scream about protecting children said nothing. No outrage from Labour. No outrage from the Home Office. No emergency debate in Parliament.
When people tried to get the sentence increased as unduly lenient, the bid failed. The system closed ranks and decided that 180 hours of sweeping streets was justice for a child rape gang victim.
A white British veteran, Adam Smith-Connor, prayed silently outside an abortion clinic and got a conviction, a criminal record, and thousands in costs.
A white British man posted an angry Facebook post after Southport and got 2 to 3 years in immediate custody.
Hamoud Al-Soaimi sexually assaulted children in a grooming gang and got a suspended sentence and 180 hours.
That is not justice. That is a two-tier system. That is politicians and judges protecting the narrative of multiculturalism instead of protecting British girls.
Robert Carr retweeted
Well well well…
'No evidence' Polish killer was far-Right, prosecutors admit as it is revealed he executed parents and sister with two shots to the head each as they slept… and even killed their two cats trib.al/m1mkNm5
Robert Carr retweeted
The mad thing is some people will believe Tedros 😂😂😂
If this is true, why did the Polish authorities rush to call him a right winger?
Surely they had better access to information than the general public who found he’s a commie antifa type?
Poland need to clarify ASAP. The deaths of innocents cannot be abused in this way.
🇵🇱 | ÚLTIMO: En Polonia, acaban de descubrir que el atacante de Cracovia, Michał Oksiński era un activista de izquierda radical, antifascista y anarcocomunista, que se burlaba del cristianismo. El gobierno de Tusk y los medios quisieron vincularlo con grupos de derecha, pero hoy se sabe que no es así. Todo se pudo filtrar de las cuentas de Oksinski qué ahora están eliminadas, la pregunta es, ¿quién eliminó las dos cuentas del atacante en Facebook, si a sus dos padres y a su hermana los encontraron muertos en su vivienda?
Robert Carr retweeted
🇵🇱 | ÚLTIMO: En Polonia, acaban de descubrir que el atacante de Cracovia, Michał Oksiński era un activista de izquierda radical, antifascista y anarcocomunista, que se burlaba del cristianismo. El gobierno de Tusk y los medios quisieron vincularlo con grupos de derecha, pero hoy se sabe que no es así. Todo se pudo filtrar de las cuentas de Oksinski qué ahora están eliminadas, la pregunta es, ¿quién eliminó las dos cuentas del atacante en Facebook, si a sus dos padres y a su hermana los encontraron muertos en su vivienda?
Robert Carr retweeted
Alastair Campbell was reminded at how loathed he is and why he has such a colossal brass neck to even show his face and accuse others of being "liars."
He wasn’t happy. Nicely done by @ZiaYusufUK
Robert Carr retweeted
Britain is broke. And to fix it, we need to start growing again.
That’s why Reform’s Economic Rescue Plan includes these 64 pro-growth measures I’d take if I were Chancellor:
𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗦𝗲𝗮
1. Approve Rosebank
2. Restart oil and gas licensing
3. Legalise onshore exploration
4. Abolish the Energy Profits Levy
5. Restore maximum economic extraction as the North Sea regulator's objective
𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻
6. Abolish the Emissions Trading Scheme
7. Halt the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
8. Repudiate AR7 contracts for difference and scrap AR8
9. Implement the Fingleton Review on nuclear in full
10. Automatically approve French and South Korean nuclear designs
𝗚𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗛𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀
11. Cut affordable housing requirements on brownfield sites
12. Permitted Development Right for brownfield housing
13. Repeal Biodiversity Net Gain
14. Exit the Aarhus Convention
15. Repeal and reform the Habitats Regulations, including Nutrient Neutrality
16. End the boiler ban
17. Legalise air conditioning to meet overheating rules
18. Remove mandatory EPC improvements
19. Revoke the Future Homes Standard
20. Repeal the Renters' Rights Act
𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲
21. Legislate approval for new runways at Heathrow and Gatwick
22. Auction airport landing slots
23. End 'target-consistent' carbon pricing in project evaluation
24. Ban carbon emissions considerations in planning applications
25. Fast-track all water reservoirs as nationally significant projects
26. Make Development Consent Orders a true one-stop shop
27. Restrict judicial review of ministerial planning decisions
28. Scrap Net Zero construction rules
29. Scrap the social value test in procurement
30. Lift launch limits at SaxaVord Spaceport
31. Open completed sections of East-West Rail
𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
32. Review regulatory barriers to AI adoption
33. Permit on-site gas generation for data centres and industry
𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗛𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿𝘀
34. Cut Employer NI back to 13.8%
35. Introduce a migrant worker levy
36. Repeal the Employment Rights Act
37. Clarify that workplace rights don't require mandatory training courses
38. Let experienced tradesmen work on government contracts without CSCS qualifications
𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆
39. Review bank capital requirements to boost lending
40. Rule out Net Zero in financial regulators' remits
41. Repeal climate-related financial disclosure rules
𝗚𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗠𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴
42. Scrap airport 'surface access strategies'
43. Abolish the electric vehicle mandates
44. Apply domestic GB hours to all UK HGV trips
45. Ban Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods
46. Back the M4 Relief Road
47. Move a new car's first MOT to four years
48. Abolish the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation
𝗨𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺𝘀
49. Replace GDPR with a New Zealand-style Privacy Act
50. Fully re-legalise Imperial units
51. Review all unchanged EU law
52. Automatically repeal remaining EU law in 5 years unless retained
𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀
53. Make quarterly Making Tax Digital reporting voluntary
54. Reduce legal obligations on SME Non-Executive Directors
55. Double permission-free event days from 28 to 56
56. Make pavement dining licences automatic and permanent
57. Let shops open until 10pm, except Sundays
58. Repeal board diversity and inclusion rules
59. Remove the Sustainable Aviation Fuel mandate
60. Abolish the packaging tax
61. Scrap BBC and Channel 4 priority on streaming platforms
62. Remove the Public Sector Equality Duty
63. Five-year sunset on all QUANGOs
64. Five-year sunset clause on all new regulations
And there are more to come!
Britain’s full potential is waiting to be unleashed 🚀
Robert Carr retweeted
THE RAPE GANG COVER UP CONTINUES
For decades, working-class White girls were gang raped, trafficked and sexually exploited on an industrial scale across towns and cities in Britain. The police, councils and prosecuting authorities repeatedly failed to protect them.
Now the former Labour Party Prime Minister who ran the Crown Prosecution Service from 2008 to 2013 has been granted special legal rights inside the national inquiry investigating those failures.
INSTEAD OF BEING SUMMONED TO ANSWER FOR HIS DECISIONS, KEIR STARMER HAS BEEN HANDED A SET OF LEGAL RIGHTS INSIDE THE NATIONAL GROOMING GANGS INQUIRY.
- He can receive relevant evidence before it is examined publicly.
- He can instruct lawyers to represent his interests throughout the proceedings.
- He can make formal submissions, seek permission for his lawyers to question witnesses and challenge evidence that affects him.
- He can also respond to proposed significant criticism before it is published.
HE CAN SEE RELEVANT EVIDENCE, PREPARE HIS DEFENCE, CHALLENGE WHAT IS SAID AND MAKE HIS CASE BEFORE THE INQUIRY REACHES ITS CONCLUSIONS.
Now consider who else has been protected.
YVETTE COOPER was Home Secretary when Labour resisted demands for a National Statutory Inquiry.
SHABANA MAHMOOD was Home Secretary when Baroness Longfield was appointed and the inquiry's terms were agreed.
ANGELA RAYNER holds responsibility for local government, including councils whose failures are being examined.
SIR MARK ROWLEY commands the Metropolitan Police, whose response is also under scrutiny.
THE CHILDREN HAD NONE OF THE PROTECTION THEY NEEDED. NOW THE PEOPLE WHO HELD POWER HAVE LAWYERS, DISCLOSURE RIGHTS AND PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS.
Ask yourself why not a single reporter, journalist or mainstream news channel is sharing with you this information. Then you will understand why my voice is blacklisted and those in power tried to have me imprisoned for leading the campaign to force a reckoning.
________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way. The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
Over a million people engaged in my content this weekend. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter. This is becoming impossible to sustain.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
Robert Carr retweeted
There are a number of reasons we got this far and forced the National Inquiry. One of these reasons was that we understood the rules as well as they did and outmanoeuvred them every time they tried to maintain the cover up.
Which is why it is important that I tell you that you are not being told the truth about Keir Starmer being summoned to the National Inquiry.
I’ll share my analysis over on Red Wall and the Rabble this evening. Once you have seen what I set out, I want you to take a moment to reflect on why it was me bringing you this information.
These people think we were born yesterday.
Raja Miah MBE
Robert Carr retweeted
Journalists trying to argue that journalists who may have committed crimes are above the law
A deeply unserious bunch.
Robert Carr retweeted
Hi, can one person show me the exemption for journalists to use a fake or tampered with passport?…
I’ll wait ⏰
( These are allegations by Reform UK & so far no one has been charged with any offence or wrongdoing )
Robert Carr retweeted
CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 12 WERE BEING GANG RAPED AND SOLD BY PAKISTANI MEN IN OLDHAM. GIRLS OF 13 AND 14, KNOWN TO THE POLICE, WERE BEING DRAGGED OFF THE STREET INTO THE TOWN'S SHISHA BARS WHERE ROOMS WERE RENTED OUT BY THE HOUR. THE POLICE AND THE COUNCIL KNEW WHAT THOSE PREMISES WERE.
Instead of closing down a network of child rape dens and rescuing these children, the 2011 police strategy for tackling Oldham's Pakistani rape gangs listed managing the force's reputation and the far right among its priorities.
The specialist team set up to protect these girls was kept out of the operations against the shisha bars. Police intelligence placing exploited children inside those premises was not passed to the officers responsible for them.
In 2014 the leader of Oldham Council wrote on his blog that the abuse of children in the town was predominantly Pakistani men targeting white girls. He knew, and he was prepared to say it on his blog read by a handful of people. He never stood up in Oldham's council chamber and confronted what was being done to those children.
Anyone surprised why the rapes carried on regardless?
RIVENDELL HOUSE WAS A CHILD BROTHEL BUILT BY OLDHAM COUNCIL
In 2007 Oldham Council took the girls most at risk from these men and put them together under one roof, in a six-bed home called Rivendell House. The council's own staff admitted its location was not ideal. Burnham's reviewers accepted that housing girls already being exploited in the same building could draw the abusers to it.
A former care worker reported that in 2010 Pakistani men drove round and round the home waiting for the girls to come out, and that staff were not allowed to stop them leaving. The worker passed this to the police and the safeguarding board. Nothing was done.
The state gathered sexually exploited children in one building. The men knew where to find them. What Oldham Council built was a child brothel, staffed and paid for by the taxpayer. When the care worker went public in 2014, the council hired a consultant to investigate the allegations. Burnham's reviewers relied on the consultant's report and the word of the staff who had been accused of complicity. It dismissed the whistleblower.
THEY LIED TO THE BBC ABOUT THE SHISHA BARS
In 2013 a chief inspector warned that the risks in the shisha bars were massive. When his email reached the BBC, the reaction at the top of the council and the police was alarm at how much the journalist knew. They told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence.
This was a lie.
Their own officers had filed several intelligence reports in 2011 and 2012 tying exploited girls to those premises. The police held intelligence naming the children and the places they were being taken. They kept it from the specialist officers whose job was to protect them.
Senior police officers, senior council officers and the politicians agreed among themselves that the danger to these children was being exaggerated and would be used by the far right. Some admitted the council was also worried about scaring off investment in the town.
Children were being raped in those buildings while the people responsible for them discussed the town's reputation.
The journalist, whose father was a senior figure in the Labour Party, then participated in the cover up.
ANDY BURNHAM'S REVIEW WAS BUILT TO CLEAR OLDHAM COUNCIL AND THE POLICE
In 2019, as a direct result of the work of former councillor Warren Bates working alongside Raja Miah and the first of the rabble, the council leader asked Andy Burnham for a review.
We published what we had. The shisha bars, the children's homes and the taxis were our allegations, and Burnham's review was built around them. Its authors admit they began by reading our evidence.
When they asked to interview me, I agreed on one condition. That my testimony be given in Oldham's council chamber and streamed live to the public. They refused, because they would only hear it in private where they would take selective notes.
Five years later, they published a report that filed everything we had exposed under allegations made on social media, and told Oldham there was no cover-up. Burnham put his name to it and told the people of Oldham there had been no cover-up.
At the time we called Burnham's Assurance Review a cover up. In 2025, under immense pressure, even Andy Burnham was forced to admit to his review's failings.
THE COVER-UP MUST BE INVESTIGATED UNDER OATH
The national inquiry must examine Oldham with its full statutory powers, and it must not be confined to the boundaries Burnham's review accepted. It must cover the schools, the youth clubs, the children's homes and every year the gangs were operating.
Greater Manchester Police must hand over every record it kept from Burnham's reviewers. Oldham Council must release every document it redacted. Andy Burnham, the former council leaders and the senior officers who handled the shisha bar intelligence must be called to give evidence under oath.
The girls of Rivendell House, the girls in the shisha bars and the girls dragged in to cars outside school gates were failed by every institution that should have protected them. Then they were told by a review that could not see the evidence that nobody covered anything up. They are owed the truth, and only a statutory inquiry has the power to get it.
THE PRIME MINISTER ANDY BURNHAM MUST BE SUMMONED BEFORE THE NATIONAL INQUIRY. ANYTHING LESS THAN THIS JUST CONTINUES THE COVER UP.
_________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
Robert Carr retweeted
I went on @BBCNewsnight and enraged all the usual radical-left loons stating these simple facts:
~1.85m foreign nationals claim £23 billion in welfare each year in Britain
~ 1.3m foreign nationals claim £11.9billion of Universal Credit
Britain must put the British people first
**Britains tax burden is the highest it’s been since the War (1948 to be exact)**
If you want to lift people up, you have to create wealth. You have to incentivise work. Which means tax them less.
Anyone who runs a business knows this.
Since then, far-left X has launched a series of ad-hominem attacks. Some even saying these ideas are “extreme far-right”
None of them have addressed the substance of my arguments.
Instead they are trying to shame me for being in one of the most successful bands of last 20 years, whilst ignoring that I have one of the biggest independent politics podcasts in Britain.
And ignoring that I’ve generated 10s of £millions in wealth and taxes for the economy, created 1000s of jobs, and built several successful companies.
Likewise they think that I might be anything but immensely proud to be associated with my own dad, one of the most successful businessmen and generous individuals this country has produced since the War, and his association with GB News, officially the most viewed and trusted news channel in the country.
He’s a hero.
Thanks to Newsnight for having me!
Robert Carr retweeted
Hey @UKLabour , what ever happened with Nick Brown ?
Do you know @andyburnham ?
Robert Carr retweeted
If Pakistan still refuses to take back Shabir Ahmed, I will not hesitate to impose flight bans, visa bans and even freeze their nationals' assets.
If they want a fight, I’ll give them one.
Robert Carr retweeted
This is how a British Prime Minister should be speaking. Putting Brits before foreign criminals.
Robert Carr retweeted
I knew Gorton & Denton was rigged.
Hannah Spencer’s campaign manager today being revealed in The Times to have broken the law by forging deals with mosques just confirms what I said at the time.
When the BBC’s Chris Mason asked me immediately after the result what happened I said it in one word:
“sectarianism”.
People said I was a bad loser. But look at what they are literally telling us themselves.
They rigged the election with local mosques.
We were told early on that “deals had been made” with the mosques.
I saw the “community elders” in action myself.
Then we watched the Greens campaign in different languages.
Whip up tensions between Hindus and Muslims.
Obsess over Gaza.
Call anybody who disagreed with them “far-right” and “divisive”.
Hannah Spencer even downplayed Islamism, suggesting during one hustings that “right-wing politicians” were responsible for the Islamist bombing of Manchester, in 2017.
All journalists saw was the weird dress sense and thought “nice fluffy Greens” and they didn’t ask any more questions.
They failed to tell the real story of that campaign.
Then we got the independent report showing 68% of polling stations experienced illegal family voting, which is what happens when a Muslim father or husband tells their entire family how to vote.
Did the Greens call any of it out?
Of course not.
They denied it all.
So did Greater Manchester Police.
But then the election interference became so unavoidable they had to start arresting people two months after the by-election.
And then the Mail uncovered similar election interference in FIFTY polling stations in Birmingham.
I’m glad I got to run in that by-election because at least I got to tell the British people the TRUTH about what is happening in our country.
Wake up people.
The Greens are extremists.
They are antisemites.
They are unBritish.
And they are a Trojan Horse for Islamism and Muslim sectarianism.
Just look at their latest racist vote at conference, to deny Jews a homeland of their own.
And how did Hannah Spencer vote?
While some Green MPs opposed it, she’s not said anything about it.
No doubt the mosques pulling her strings have aired their view.
The Greens are a major threat to our democracy and country.
They must be stopped.
Robert Carr retweeted
If this was white people with anti immigration views… this would be rolling news.
It would be spoke about by every left leaning politician.
But it will be ignored… especially by @MayorofLondon
Robert Carr retweeted
Dear @metpoliceuk, why didn’t you search the location in Tower Hamlets connected with the IP address? Devices may have been seized that could reveal the identity of the person making the death threats. There’s so much more. You have failed @Benleo, his family, and the public.
An update on something that’s been happening over the past 12 months.
Somebody or some people threatened to kill my children. The offence would certainly carry a custodial sentence because it cited a weapon, vulnerable groups (children) and was done anonymously on social media. My family required 24/7 security and the kids even had someone walking to school with them. Thank you to GB News for all their support with that, we’re very grateful for all their help and concern.
Police located the account to an address in Tower Hamlets but after saying they were about to make arrests, they now say they won’t pursue it because it’s potentially one of three individuals and they can’t pinpoint which one it was. How about you go round and ask them - and you know, investigate?
Police are happy enough to make 12,000 arrests each year for social media posts but when it comes to threatening to kill children of someone who speaks up for the country, it’s apparently not a big issue despite the gravity of the offence.
The problem that arises from this is people start beginning to lose trust in the institutions that are meant to protect them. The institutions we pay for. And when that trust erodes, it’s not good for society.
Ann Widdecombe was slaughtered only months ago and I’m told on my own show by certain guests that words don’t kill people. Well, they do. And they have a huge impact on people’s lives.
Thank you again to GB News for all their support. They have been top class. Shame I can’t say the same about the police.


























