Vice President of Public Affairs at @NetChoice. Tech solves problems. Big government creates them.

Tampa, FL
Joined February 2018
Robert Winterton retweeted
NEW Senate polls: Georgia: 🔵 Ossoff 55% (+15) 🔴 Collins 40% . Maine: 🔵 Jackson 51% (+7) 🔴 Collins 44% . Iowa: 🔵 Turek 45% (+2) 🔴 Hinson 43% . Ohio: 🔴 Husted 47% 🔵 Brown 47% . Nebraska: 🔴 Ricketts 47% (+1) ⚪️ Osborn 46% . Florida: 🔴 Moody 51% (+8) 🔵 Nixon 43% @EchelonInsights/@NetChoice, LV, 10/16-23 netchoice.org/netchoice-eche…
56
46
13
484
272,096
Robert Winterton retweeted
🚨 NetChoice/Echelon Insights Poll: Voters Rank AI Regulation Far Behind Cost of Living, Want One National AI Standard WASHINGTON – Heading into the final week of the midterms, voters place regulating artificial intelligence (AI) near the bottom of their priorities, according to a new NetChoice survey conducted by Echelon Insights. Asked to choose the top issues for policymakers, 55% of likely voters named inflation and the cost of living and only 9% named regulating AI. On the question of who should write AI rules, voters favor a single national approach. 68% say Congress should set national AI rules that apply in every state, compared with 19% who say states should set their own, and majorities of Republicans (65%), Independents (64%) and Democrats (72%) agree. "Washington has spent recent months treating AI regulation as a leading voter concern, but voters say kitchen table issues, like inflation and jobs, are far more worthy of government attention," said @RobPWJ, Vice President of Public Affairs at NetChoice. "On AI, over two-thirds of voters (68%) want the clarity of a national framework rather than a state-by-state patchwork." KEY FINDINGS: 1. Cost of living leads. 55% named inflation and the cost of living as a top priority, followed by jobs and the economy (25%), ending the war with Iran (22%) and healthcare costs (20%). Groceries are the top pressure on household finances (66%) and the top area voters want the federal government to focus on when working to lower prices (62%). 2. AI regulation ranks low. 9% named regulating AI as a top priority, and only 2% named breaking up large tech companies. 3. Voters use AI and find it helpful. Half of voters (50%) use AI at least a few times a week. Among those who use it, 46% say it has been extremely or very helpful in their daily life or work. 4. Enforce existing law first. A plurality (48%) say existing laws on fraud, discrimination, privacy and consumer protection should be enforced before new AI-specific laws are written, while 41% want new laws now. 5. Consumer-focused antitrust has broad support. 76% support applying the consumer welfare standard in antitrust enforcement and 7% oppose it. 90% agree antitrust laws should be written and enforced equally on all companies. 6. Breaking up large companies should be a low priority for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Voters want the FTC to focus on stopping fraud and scams (49%) and protecting data privacy (41%). Breaking up large American companies ranked last at 15%. 7. American tech leadership matters. 80% agree the country is stronger when the world's leading technology companies are based in the United States. 35% say breaking up America's leading tech companies would hurt the U.S. in the AI race with China, compared with only 22% who say it would help. 8. Voters reject losing features to EU-style rules. 52% oppose bringing European antitrust regulations to the U.S. if it meant losing access to convenient features they use today, and only 27% support it. 9. Support for data centers rises with information. Support for a data center planned in voters' own county rises from 33% to 44% after they hear more about data centers, and opposition falls from 58% to 48%. 54% agree that keeping data center development growing is key to American national security after being told data centers power hospitals, companies and the military, and 48% say they would be more likely to support new data center investment after learning that major tech companies have committed to pay for the electricity and grid upgrades their facilities require.
3
8
2
10
3,287
Robert Winterton retweeted
People’s Republic of China level insanity.
JUST IN: UK police arrest 15 y/o boy, seize his devices, & collect his DNA after he posted photo of a local politician edited to look like a rabbit.
84
401
10
3,016
69,268
Robert Winterton retweeted
Astonishing admission from Ofcom. Post Online Safety Act, they found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content. In fact since the OSA went into force, marginally MORE children have encountered pornography, self harm, and eating disorder content.
15
42
7
199
12,801
Robert Winterton retweeted
🚨NEW: The Online Safety Act has been a failure, according to a new report from Ofcom. Ofcom have found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content since the law came into effect last July. This is despite the signifigant threats to free speech and privacy.
226
1,558
426
12,442
536,165
Robert Winterton retweeted
I hear Carlson a bit differently here. Yes, he's definitely suggesting he'd be fine with the Nazis winning. the war and defeating Britain. But what comes through for me is the profound intellectual and moral unseriousness. It's a kind of debater's nihilism that thinks any good sounding talking point is a good point. For instance, he says at least if Germany won, Britain would be speaking a "European language." That sounds clever to un-clever people. But it's moronic on its own terms (Would Tucker be okay with Americans speaking Spanish? That's a European language, too). It reduces the interests and issues involved in WWII down to a ridiculous single metric. It's childish bullshit, but it sounds sophisticated to the insipid and the ignorant and it thrills those who understand the trolling of it. And that's why this interview is representative of Tucker more broadly these days. He's at sea. Nothing really matters except "winning" the conversation, the moment, the clicks. He's embraced a kind of Nietzschean amoralism that thinks sowing doubt in any notions of right v wrong, good v evil, traditional patriotism v transgressive iconoclasm is self-rewarding. "Neocons" and their ilk think Putin is bad? I'll claim he's awesome with the dumbest arguments imaginable packaged like they're smart. Similarly, Tucker likes to traffic in the idea that Hitler should have won, not because Tucker's a big believer in Nazism. He's not a big believer in *anything* other than the bit itself. He likes the idea that the Nazis should have won, because he likes turning over turtles and being a dick for the amusement of people who celebrate dickishness. More specifically, he also likes it because the argument that it was a good thing we defeated the Nazis is inconvenient to him and his pet causes. That America and the UK were the good guys still has heft, substance, and authority, and Tucker's whole transvaluative approach is to burn down good things with weight and substance by elevating evil bullshit into seriousness to prove his own transgressive courage. Every argument is permitted and equally valid because all truths are equally just matters of opinion. The superior opinion isn't the one with the better facts or the better reasoning, it's just the one more confidently or sneeringly expressed. That's why this interview went badly for Tucker, because he ran into someone who actually knows true things and is confident in what he knows. This is also why Tucker spends most of his time talking to cranks, bigots, weirdoes, and hacks who are good at sounding like experts so long as their bullshit goes unchallenged. Tucker doesn't give a rat's ass about ideas or history. He cares about vibes and sowing moral doubt about what is good by hawking moral support for what is bad. The Holocaust becomes a triviality in that project, which in a very real way, is worse than denying it happened. He's denying it didn't really matter much if it did.
Tucker saying he wishes Hitler had won World War II was absolutely on my 2026 bingo card
407
713
109
4,547
481,373
Robert Winterton retweeted
At first, this might sound like bluster. Certainly critics have met this outlook with derision or (at best) skepticism. But Ed’s point is worth reflecting on. AI is already revolutionizing the world. It has made information even more readily accessible, and enabled ready synthesis of many sources. A revolution in the search industry. It enables creation of new text, either as an end product or as a starting point. (A revolution in several industries by itself) It enables vast computational processes to happen at lightning speed. Revolutionizing research—and virtually any field it touches. And the buildout for this technology has revolutionized the industrial backbone that makes these advances possible. Part of that is data and its storage (data centers were already part of the American economy and have become more integral as our data needs have increased—even before AI came on the scene) and then the power needs for this storage are incentivizing a revisit to the energy industry—nuclear is at the forefront again. AI is spurring the buildout of space. @SpaceX, @amazon, and @Google are all looking to the stars for new ways to capture the untapped potential of space to store, transfer, and create value for humanity. The advent of AI was a spark that galvanized the next Industrial Revolution. We are in the midst of it now. America leapfrogged the world during the first Industrial Revolution, during the space race, and during the digital age. It would be a shame if we lost our edge now when all the signs indicate we are poised to succeed again. But success is not some abstract good. Success is good because success means better, more efficient, cheaper, improved methods and modes of living *for people.* I’m optimistic. The future is bright. All we need to do is keep pursuing it.
We’re in the midst of our generation’s industrial revolution. AI and other emerging technologies are poised to push the bounds of human prosperity. But only if we let them. Optimism is how we win. That’s what #DataAfterDark is all about.
9
25
1,295
Urgency update
"We need act with more urgency when it comes to economic growth” In his first interview since being asked to leave cabinet by Andy Burnham, former Business Secretary Peter Kyle tells #BBCLauraK that there isn't enough focus on growth in government. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9zr…
5
69
1
1,087
51,646
Robert Winterton retweeted
42
473
40
6,456
234,975
Robert Winterton retweeted
have your agent talk to my agent
34
113
13
2,473
59,227
Robert Winterton retweeted
This ad is very Jonah Ryan Veep b-plot
NEW: Protecting America’s Future Super PAC is out with an anti-Talarico ad featuring Congressman @realBrandonGill
14
155
5
4,218
125,536
Robert Winterton retweeted
The AI Doomers are the same people that proclaimed the end of the Internet during ‘net neutrality’ debates.
113
777
39
3,281
177,823
🚨NEW: The story behind Prince William County’s Digital Gateway, told by the property owners who fought for it. Hear from Mary Ann Ghadban and Page Snyder about their fight for their land and the opportunity data centers could bring. WATCH: youtube.com/watch?v=O51_dBZn…
3
6
3
44
22,713
Robert Winterton retweeted
BREAKING: China rejects calls from U.S. tech leaders to slow AI development, blasting the warnings as “fearmongering.”
487
1,264
639
14,058
1,571,658
Robert Winterton retweeted
🚨NEW LAWSUIT: NetChoice Sues Illinois Over Unconstitutional Social Media User Tax and Digital Ad Tax SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — NetChoice today filed two complaints against the State of Illinois to block enforcement of two newly enacted tax provisions, the Social Media User Tax and the Digital Ad Tax. Both measures unconstitutionally and discriminatorily single out digital services, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the federal Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA). "Illinois’ new internet taxes firmly establish the state’s opposition to online speech, innovation, and its own business community,” said @Paul_Taske, Director of the NetChoice Litigation Center. “The Supreme Court has made abundantly clear that legislators cannot target a subset of media for disfavored taxation, but that’s precisely what these taxes do. Not only are they flatly unconstitutional under the First Amendment, but they blatantly disregard Congress’s clear judgment under PITFA that digital services cannot be subject to discriminatory taxation.” A Tax on Audience Size Is a Tax on Speech The Social Media User Tax imposes fees on platforms based on the number of Illinois users they reach, exempting services with fewer than 100,000 users while penalizing those with larger audiences. The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the government may not tax one category of speaker more heavily than another. Illinois' Social Media User Tax follows the same blueprint NetChoice is already challenging in NetChoice v. Chicago, a pending suit over the city's own per-user Social Media Amusement Tax. Both Taxes Run Afoul of Federal Law Both the Social Media User Tax and the Digital Ad Tax are in direct violation of PITFA, the federal law by which Congress expressly barred states from imposing "discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce." Both taxes apply exclusively to online services while leaving comparable offline counterparts — social clubs, community centers, professional associations, and traditional advertising — untouched. This is precisely the sort of digital-only taxation Congress intended to preempt, and similar laws, including Maryland's Digital Advertising Tax, have already been struck down by courts on comparable grounds. Real Costs for Illinoisans and Their Small Businesses Because the Social Media User Tax is a flat fee untethered to a company's actual revenue or profit in Illinois, some services may choose to limit or exit the Illinois market altogether — cutting residents off from vital communication, educational, and community-organizing tools they rely on daily. Local businesses, including restaurants, auto dealers, and community organizations, will also face higher costs to reach customers through online ads under the new Digital Ad Tax. This tax raises the cost of doing business, costs that are likely to be passed on to Illinois consumers, and harms entrepreneurs’ ability to grow.
2
21
3
59
6,695
Robert Winterton retweeted
WATCH: AI is being developed to help save critically ill babies. NICU doctor: “We can do that using AI” to make placing a breathing tube “safer and more effective” when a baby is in respiratory failure. That’s AI innovation at work.
1
25
2
67
4,292
Robert Winterton retweeted
Data centers cover 38% of Loudoun County, VA's budget. They sit on just 4% of the county's business land — and pay $26 in taxes for every $1 in services they use. Loudoun's homeowners have received property tax cuts for ten years running because of it. 👏
1
4
1
3
426