Week of 14 to 20 September wrapped.
Strongest movers:
STONK (54.06x),
PONS (34.48x),
INDEX (2.64x),
JUGGERNAUT (2.49x)
Steepest declines: ENA (0.20x), LARP (0.26x), IBS (0.37x)
21.2% of tracked tokens hit 2x or more this week. Three cleared 10x. None fell 80% or worse.
One tracked entry returned a corrupted all-time high reading, which threw its calculated multiple into the thousands. We've pulled it from this week's average until the underlying figure is corrected. Data integrity comes before a clean headline number.
Full breakdown on the site.
1
31
I spent some time looking through $ANSEM’s project numbers, and honestly, I think there’s a more interesting story here than the headline figures.
✓ 708 projects launched.
✓ 2.1B tokens airdropped.
✓ $141.67M traded volume.
✓ 129 migrated coins.
✓ 147K+ active holders.
On the surface, those are big numbers.
But here’s the part I think people should actually discuss:
129 migrations out of 708 launches is only about 18%.
And “migrated” doesn’t mean successful. On Pump fun, it basically means the token completed its bonding curve and moved into a liquidity pool. It tells you almost nothing about whether the project survived another 30, 60 or 90 days.
The same goes for $141.67M in volume.
That is trading activity. It isn't $141.67M of value created, and it certainly isn't revenue.
Even the 2.1B #airdropped number needs context. ANSEM’s own dashboard puts that at roughly $586.8K across 28.3K wallets.
So the real question isn't:
“Are these numbers big?”
They obviously are.
The real question is:
- What happened to all those projects after the attention disappeared?
- How many were still active after 30 days?
- How many still had meaningful liquidity after 90 days?
- How many holders actually stayed?
- What was the median performance of migrated projects?
- How much of the volume came from a relatively small number of tokens?
That's the data I'd want to see.
And there's another uncomfortable part.
ANSEM itself has had significant supply concentration, with public on-chain analysis putting roughly 58–60% of the supply in the largest Ansem-linked wallet. That's not automatically a red flag, but it makes words like “community-owned” worth examining carefully rather than accepting at face value.
I actually think the transparency is one of the more interesting things about @blknoiz06 .
Putting the launches, migrations, burns, distributions and holder numbers on the record is better than throwing around screenshots and asking everyone to trust the narrative.
But transparency isn't just publishing big numbers.
Real transparency is publishing the ugly numbers too.
- The failures.
- The dead launches.
- The retention rate.
- The median project.
- The concentration.
- The wallets that sold.
- The projects that looked promising and completely disappeared.
That's where I'd judge #ANSEM.
So my current view is pretty simple:
I don't think these numbers prove ANSEM.io is a scam or won't do well.
I also don't think they prove ANSEM has built a sustainable ecosystem.
Right now, I see an unusually interesting experiment in turning attention, trading activity and creator influence into an on-chain economy.
Whether that becomes durable infrastructure or just a very well-documented memecoin cycle is still the part nobody can honestly answer.
34
$ANSEM - 12 days in.
Listed at $0.17, now sitting at $0.27.
Hit an ATH of $339.39M, currently 20.49% off that peak.
+9.73% in the last 24h.
ROI: 1.63x from listing.
Been on our radar since day 1. Still watching how this one settles.
What's everyone's read on it this far in?
#CryptoResearch #Solana
1
13
Week of Aug 10-16 wrapped.
Average return: 0.99x.
Basically flat - the market gave back almost exactly what it took.
Best movers:
$JIMOTHY (1.90x),
$PONS (1.76x)
$STONKBROKER (1.74x)
Hit hardest: $POOLS (0.16x), $IBS (0.62x), $LARP (0.67x)
Zero tokens hit 2x this week.
3% fell 80% or more.
Flat weeks tell you more than green ones. Anyone holding through this one?
#CryptoResearch #Solana
1
103
RugSnap is a #cryptoresearch and risk-monitoring platform that evaluates crypto tokens using automated blockchain data snapshots from DexScreener alongside manual human-written case files.
2
111
$ANSEM @blknoiz06 - 4 days in.
Listed: $0.17 / $165.82M → Now: $0.21 / $207.66M
+18.04% in 24h.
ATH: $222.16M, sitting 6.53% off that peak.
ROI: 1.25x from listing
Vol 24h: $2.00M
Txns 24h: 9,820
Liquidity: $2.13M
Snapshot history's held a steady climb since listing, no wild swings.
Still WATCHING.
1
18
$STONK - 4 days in.
Listed: $0.00532 / $5.32M → Now: $0.00856 / $8.56M
+44.20% in 24h.
ATH: $10.79M, currently 20.68% off that peak.
ROI: 1.61x from listing
Vol 24h: $917.06K
Txns 24h: 4,235
Cooled slightly since our last snapshot (-0.78% market cap), but still well above listing.
Still WATCHING.
#solana #CryptoResearch
1
1
37
$JUGGERNAUT - 3 days in.
Listed: $0.00271 / $2.57M → Now: $0.00364 / $3.44M
+60.35% in 24h alone.
ATH: $3.87M, sitting 11.21% off that peak.
ROI: 1.34x from listing
Vol 24h: $1.91M
Txns 24h: 5,491
Snapshot history says the move is real, not a one-candle wonder.
Still WATCHING.
2
124
Week of Aug 3-9 wrapped.
Average return across everything we track: 1.08x. Not a bull run, not a bloodbath, just numbers doing what they do.
Top movers: $PONS (2.66x), $JIMOTHY (2.17x), $STONKBROKER (1.67x)
Worst hit: $POOLS (0.31x), $MAX (0.37x), $LARP (0.55x)
Only 6.1% of tracked tokens even hit 2x this week. Zero hit 10x.
Most weeks aren't a story. This was most weeks.
#CryptoResearch #Solana
1
1
90
Full weekly leaderboard, every token, every number:
rugsnap.bond/leaderboard
5
Same illusion plays out in crypto. Nobody's asking if a token is good or bad, just if it hasn't been checked yet. People trade the story before anyone looks at what's actually on-chain.
38
PI NETWORK filed.
60M+ users, a mainnet six years in the making, and a token down 96% from ATH. Live infrastructure, real team, but supply sits heavily in Foundation hands.
Verdict: PROCEED WITH CAUTION
#PiNetwork #CryptoResearch
1
144
Full breakdown; problem, tokenomics, risk flags, what we could and couldn't verify:
rugsnap.bond/cases/pi-networ…
55
Filing in progress: PI NETWORK.
60M+ users. A mainnet six years in the making.
A token down 96% from its ATH.
The numbers don't match the narrative.
#PiNetwork #CryptoNews
1
133
"WATCHING" isn't a shrug. It's a stopwatch.
It means: tracked since day one, snapshot history intact, no red flags, but too early to call VERIFIED or FLAGGED.
We don't rush a verdict just to have one.
Question for you: should WATCHING flip to VERIFIED after 7 days clean, or do you want us to wait longer?
rugsnap.bond
#DYOR #CryptoResearch #CryptoTwitter
16
Two names, two different stories today.
$STONKBROKER
Listed: $0.02 / $29.39M → Now: $0.03 / $73.32M
Hit a new ATH of $82.01M, then pulled back 10.60%.
ROI still 2.50x from listing. Vol 24h: $3.22M
$Jimothy
Listed: $0.00383 / $3.83M → Now: $0.00873 / $8.73M
ATH was $56.17M, now down 84.46% from that peak.
Still 2.28x above listing despite a -46.08% swing in 24h.
Same lesson both times: ATH isn't the number that matters. Where it sits now versus where it started is.
Both WATCHING. rugsnap.bond
77
48hrs on the board — two names moving.
$STONKBROKER
Listed: $0.02 / $29.39M → Now: $0.03 / $50.82M
ATH: $50.82M (sitting at ATH, 0% drawdown) | ROI: 1.73x | Vol 24h: $3.62M
$CASHCAT
Listed: $0.12 / $113.82M → Now: $0.13 / $125.09M
ATH: $126.94M | ROI: 1.10x | Vol 24h: $5.11M
Both still WATCHING. Full history on rugsnap.bond
23
Zero tokens on our board have hit 2x.
Zero have fallen 80%+.
That's not a broken tracker. That's 33 tokens, full history, zero sponsored listings mixed into the numbers.
Boring is the point. rugsnap.bond
14





























