Seye.

My thoughts: The biggest mistake that both OpenAI & Anthropic have made was leading with what AI could do for companies instead of what AI could do to improve the lives of average people. The focus on that narrative overlooks what I believe would've been the easiest way to get buy in from the general public which is healthcare. If either of these CEOs actually spent more time listening to average people, they would've understood that healthcare is a very big concern for many and had they shown how AI can be used to improve health outcomes, they would've had a larger backing from everyday people to use it for other things. Second mistake was pushing an AI efficiency narrative that influenced executive leaders in the American job market to believe that mass layoffs were necessary to remain competitive in the AI race because of the promised cost savings and efficiency of AI. The problem is that true AI transformation requires much more than throwing an LLM at existing processes, and in many cases, we are still years away from realizing the level of efficiency being promised. Most companies at this moment in time do not have enough AI expertise internally to properly quantify the productivity gains, limitations, or quality of the outputs they're receiving. Yet somehow, at the same time, we're constantly being told that we're on the verge of AGI. Third mistake was pushing all of these AI doomsday scenarios while continuing to present moving forward as the only real option. I understand why it seemed necessary to continue from a geopolitical standpoint, and even ego, but this was the narrative for years even while the public was being told how badly this could potentially go. Then you had whistleblowers and former employees coming forward raising concerns about what they were seeing internally. Some of those concerns, particularly at OpenAI, were publicly disputed or dismissed as inaccurate. Now we're being told by the leaders of both companies that we need to slow down. If AI technology has crossed a significant threshold where the leaders believe slowing down is necessary, the public deserves to know what changed, when it changed, and what they're seeing now that makes slowing down necessary. I think everyone understands that we do not want to lose the race to China, but it has been unclear to the average person what exactly losing means because right now, in this moment, American people already feel they are losing everything. It has also never been made clear what winning this race actually looks like for the average American. Our industry has created conditions that now make slowing down politically, globally, locally, and economically difficult. A few tweets and paragraphs saying additional safety personnel are going to be introduced cannot seriously be presented as the fix, and there should be a push for more, especially if the risks are as serious as they're now saying they are.