Panda 🟦

let's see what this baby can do

Let's be real here. Look at the quality of the below AI Video. Secret Seedance model? Veo 4.0? Nope. It's a model that only costs $0.02 per second of video. 7 times cheaper than Grok Imagine, 15 times cheaper than Seedance 2.0. If this was exclusive to Higgsfield or Venice, you'd be seeing paid posters screaming "THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!!" around the clock. This model is actually 4 months old - it's LTX2.3 (@ltx_io) running on our custom harness at imgnAI. It's one of our favorite models, and thanks to being open source we can provide it at absolutely dirt cheap costs. We set up our harness to allow you to upload any audio/video (or pull directly from a youtube url!), and feed it in with any image to create stunning scenes like the below. Most consumers and creators miss out on the best (and cheapest!) AI models because their feeds are flooded with ads for only the most popular models, and often with enormous markup costs. We forego the paid poster & timeline blitz route for marketing, and instead focus that energy (and cost!) on building the best tools possible, at the lowest costs possible for our users. If you care about Quality and Cost in your AI pipelines - be it AI Artwork or full cinematic video flows - try imgnAI today. Take a look at what gets built by creators, instead of marketers.

As a note on the Venice raise, and why we haven't sought a Series A or otherwise: If we sell equity in a company, there is no point in having a token. VCs who purchase equity are glad to receive (and dump) tokens, but their actual "protected investment" is in the EQUITY. If you make equity available to purchase as a separate or standalone thing away from your token, you are declaring your token to be useless - and all who purchased it to be exit liquidity for VCs. VCs who dump their tokens on you have zero interest in any token buy-backs; they could even challenge them in court as there is no fiduciary responsibility when it comes to a token. We'd have a very easy and comfortable life if we just went and accepted a Series A for equity, but have turned down this route in favor of building something which can reward token holders when we hit profitability. It's forced us to build much leaner, and much smarter solutions just to survive - but we'd rather survive to let our holders eventually thrive, rather than throw them under the bus for a VC payslip.