Associate Professor of Management @UQ_Business, The University of Queensland; Researching #HR #talent #globalmobility #futureofwork.

Brisbane, Australia
Joined January 2013
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
2
196
New paper on algorithmic management and worker agency: The platform perspective on algoactivism. Published open access in @HR_TIHR with @Prakriti_DG, @RonanCarbery, @amcdonnell_hrm. @MU_Business @CUBSucc @UQ_Business. #gigwork @algorithms #algorithmicmanagement #platforms #HR
1
4
97
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
5
21
1,360
🚀 PhD Opportunities at @UQ_Business , Australia – start 2026! Scholarships close 15 Dec 2025. Research areas: 1️⃣ Future Workforce & AI 2️⃣ Digital HRM 3️⃣ Talent Marketplaces and Skills. Interested? Send CV via email. #PhD #Scholarship #FutureOfWork #HR #Research
1
55
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
1
6
1,142
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
7
12
1,452
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
4
9
1,412
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
2
2
7
1,586
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
1
3
3
1,266
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
3
2
1,022
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
2
5
1,444
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
1
7
2
12
3,281
Stefan Jooss retweeted
Many managers pay insufficient attention to talent strategy. @mitsmr presents five interventions that can help deepen their commitment to identifying and developing key capabilities sloanreview.mit.edu/article/…
1
1
90
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/4ntsZdT
3
1
11
1,816
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv xitter.cf/mitsmr/status/19679825…
3
13
2,083
Talent management efforts are imperative to any leader’s role, not one-off exercises or tick-the-box compliance requirements. mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
1
3
7
1,495
Our model describes four different talent management approaches along two key dimensions: leaders’ strategic depth (tactical or strategic) and scope of impact (across their own team or the whole organization). mitsmr.com/42hcMQv
1
6
16
2,028