Tracking patterns. Sharing signals. SAVE THE CHILDREN!! Truther Media & Tracing Justice Moderator/FB Administrator/Ambassador
Joined March 2009
- Tweets318K
- Following5.9K
- Followers4.5K
- Likes132K
SPMGURL retweeted
Patriots have faced uncertainty, unexpected challenges, and moments that tested our faith, strength, and resolve. Through it all, one thing remains: our faith in Jesus Christ.
Where Jesus Christ Goes, We Go.
#WJCGWG 🇺🇸
Spread the message. Share it. Live it. Let it go viral.
SPMGURL retweeted
Doesn’t look like a joke to me 🤷🏻
Who would be the perfect man to throw every one of those correspondents in their ass when they get out of line…
This guy 👇🏻
🇺🇸 UFC CEO Dana White says he’s flying to Washington, DC, for a Monday meeting with President Trump, who publicly offered him the White House press secretary role on Truth Social.
Despite reports that White has already declined the offer, he did not confirm a rejection during a press conference in London, saying he would have more to share after meeting with Trump.
SPMGURL retweeted
Hey Roger @RogerJStoneJr . Save that language for your Boy Toy. He must love being talked to like that.
Really classy 💩.
Real men don’t talk to ladies like this, just in case you were never taught this by your mother.
🤡
SPMGURL retweeted
Yall keep using the term Qanon
There is no Qanon
There is Q
Then there are anons
We addressed this long ago
SPMGURL retweeted
Just fyi. Vets can still be tried in military courts.
Yes. Under current U.S. law, certain retired veterans can be prosecuted in military courts (courts-martial) under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Who Is Covered
Article 2 of the UCMJ (10 U.S.C. § 802) subjects these categories to military jurisdiction:
•Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay (the broadest category — most people who retired from active duty after 20+ years and receive a pension).
•Members of the Fleet Reserve and Fleet Marine Corps Reserve (Navy/Marine enlisted personnel typically transferred after 20 years of active service who receive retainer pay).
•Retired reservists only in limited circumstances (mainly if receiving hospitalization from an armed force). Most pure reserve-component retirees are not subject solely due to retired status.
Veterans who separated before qualifying for retirement (generally under 20 years of active service, with no retired/retainer pay) are not subject to the UCMJ after discharge.
Practical Reality
This jurisdiction is legally established and has been repeatedly upheld by military appellate courts (including the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in cases like United States v. Begani (2021) and others). The Supreme Court has not directly ruled on the constitutionality for retirees and has declined recent opportunities to review challenges.
In practice it is rare. Service policies (such as Army guidance) generally limit court-martials of retirees to “extraordinary circumstances,” often requiring high-level approval. Recall to active duty (under 10 U.S.C. § 688) is commonly used for prosecution, though jurisdiction can exist without it for covered retirees.
Jurisdiction can apply to:
•Offenses committed while on active duty (even if discovered years later; certain serious crimes like rape or murder have no statute of limitations under the UCMJ).
•Some post-retirement offenses, because covered retirees retain a formal military status and remain subject to recall.
Notable examples include cases involving serious crimes (e.g., murder or sexual offenses) that surfaced after retirement, where civilian options were limited or unavailable.
Summary:
Regular-component retirees drawing pay (and Fleet Reserve members) remain potentially subject for life under current statute and case law. Reserve retirees generally are not. It is uncommon but legally available, especially for pre-retirement misconduct in serious cases.
Gen. Flynn sat 19 times with Mueller’s team after pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about his Russian contacts and already under investigation for prior Russia ties like the 2015 RT dinner.
Theorists claim this puts him at the center of how the Russia probe played out.
Pair that with alleged Jan. 6 optics work alongside Alex Jones to make MAGA look violent. These people are full of shit.
Yes you @GenFlynn and @RealAlexJones.
SPMGURL retweeted
Flynn is a traitor to our President! Along with his pal Roger Stone! They don’t get and more corrupt than those two!
SPMGURL retweeted
Watch the Danish documentary A Storm Foretold about Roger Stone
youtu.be/cktTVDJuA3k?feature…
SPMGURL retweeted
Wow
Look @dbongino
See they can’t come back at you at facts.
But see this is how they really feel about our president when they don’t get what they want
Jan 20th 2021 - Roger Stone does not get his second pardon and calls for Trump to be locked up.
From his documentary - A Storm Foretold
SPMGURL retweeted
Roger Stone to a woman who criticized him and Flynn: “Fuck you, Donna… Now shut the fuck up.”
Facts:
On August 8, 2015, President Trump’s campaign stated that Trump fired Stone the night before because Stone was using the campaign for his own personal publicity. Stone immediately claimed the opposite, tweeting that he fired Trump and later producing a resignation letter.
Stone has documented ties to Proud Boys (including the “Friends of Stone” group that included Enrique Tarrio) and used Oath Keepers as security in the days around January 6. Those associations shaped much of the worst optics of that day, alongside Flynn’s own role in the surrounding drama.
A man who rewrites the history of being fired by Trump, grifts off the movement, and speaks to women this way has never been trustworthy.
Trump was right to cut him loose in 2015.
FOLLOW TRUMP! 🇺🇸
If you haven’t seen the movie about this “person” then you SHOULD!!! “A storm Foretold!” WATCH IT NOW!! 👇🏻 teapawt.net/miky_maiorano/status/1…
SPMGURL retweeted
It was the calm before the storm….
Unmitigated Americanism is about to hit this Country like a lead brick.
“Start Your Engines”
SPMGURL retweeted
Our new Chief of Staff! @StephenM
SPMGURL retweeted
We dismissed the case because the court rejected our demands to sequester the ballots, and the election is now over. Our efforts to restore confidence and integrity in elections continue. We will pursue every civil and criminal remedy to ensure only eligible American citizens vote in American elections. We filed a Statement of Interest in a separate case to compel California's compliance with federal election laws. We will continue to investigate and prosecute those who violate election laws.
The Justice Department moves to dismiss its lawsuit demanding California set aside ballots allegedly sent to noncitizens, days after Republicans’ significant losses in the midterm elections. apnews.com/article/californi…
