I used to think confidence was a sign someone knew what they were doing.
Now I’m not so sure.
A lot of people are confident because they haven’t thought deeply enough yet. 🧵
The people I trust most usually have a different kind of confidence.
They can explain the tradeoffs.
They know what might go wrong.
They’re clear on what they don’t know.
That feels much more real.
One of the most underrated skills is knowing when a conversation is not really about the topic.
The topic is pricing.
The real issue is trust.
The topic is timeline.
The real issue is risk.
The topic is scope.
The real issue is control. 🧵
If you only respond to the surface issue, you can argue forever and get nowhere.
But once you identify the actual concern underneath, things move much faster.
I’ve learned the hard way that “good vibes” are not a strategy.
A meeting can feel great.
A partnership can sound exciting.
A deal can look obvious.
And still be completely misaligned underneath. 🧵
The boring questions matter more than the exciting ones:
What does each side actually want?
What happens if this fails?
Where is the pressure coming from?
Who needs this more?
That’s usually where the truth lives.
One small thing that changed how I make decisions:
Before reacting, I ask myself:
“What would make this person’s behavior make perfect sense?”
Sounds simple, but it’s weirdly powerful. 🧵
Because usually there is an explanation.
Maybe they’re under pressure.
Maybe they want a different outcome than they’re saying.
Maybe they have less leverage than they’re pretending.
Once you find the reason, the whole situation feels less chaotic.
One thing I’ve changed my mind on:
Speed is overrated in important decisions.
Not because speed is bad.
Because a fast decision based on a bad read is just expensive confidence. 🧵
Sometimes 20 minutes of better thinking saves 6 months of cleanup.
What’s really happening?
Who benefits?
What assumptions am I making?
What would change my mind?
Boring questions. Massive ROI.
There’s a kind of person who always seems “hard to read.”
Usually they’re not mysterious.
You just haven’t figured out what they’re optimizing for yet. 🧵
Once you understand someone’s incentives, their behavior gets a lot less confusing.
What they say matters.
But what they consistently choose matters more.
A useful question before any important decision:
“If I’m wrong, what am I probably wrong about?”
Not “am I right?”
That question is too easy to defend. 🧵
Ask where your model breaks.
Wrong incentive?
Wrong timeline?
Wrong read on the person?
Wrong assumption about what matters?
That’s where the useful information is.
