🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
Next stop in a busy London week: Stable Summit.
Catch our CEO @simonb_ldn tomorrow alongside our partners at @StellarOrg as Zebec brings practical experience in stablecoin payroll to the discussions shaping the future of digital payments.
Our focus: helping businesses make stablecoins part of their daily operations.
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
Yesterday, Zebec and @circle brought together leaders in finance, technology and policy at the legendary Cavalry and Guards Club in London to discuss the future of stablecoins and tokenized deposits.
On the agenda: how businesses can put them to use, and how payments could work across public and private networks.
For Zebec, that starts with payroll: helping businesses pay their teams and move money around the world.
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
Excited for an engaging debate today on our panel at the Cavalry & Guards Club post @blockworksDAS
Zebec pays enterprise payroll in USDC every day. Now we’re bringing that conversation to London.
Co-hosted with @circle: Institutional Investment in Onchain Finance.
Panel: Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Bank Deposits
Hear from @RossKempsell (House of Lords), @midnightfdn, @calebandbrown, Frame and our CEO @simonb_ldn 👇
Zebec Network’s last 30 days: tokenized stocks, buybacks and a London debut during DAS
Zebec Network (@Zebec_HQ) solana:ZBCNpuD7YMXzTHB2fhGkGi78MNsHGLRXUhRewNRm9RU has had a busy month. Here’s what happened:
1. Tokenized stocks in the SuperApp
On Oct 21, Zebec added xStocks by Backed Finance to its SuperApp. Eligible non-U.S. users can now hold on-chain versions of stocks like Apple, Nvidia and Amazon.
2. $100K buyback of 40.5M ZBCN
Zebec bought back 40.5M ZBCN in Q3, paid for with card and payroll revenue. The tokens stay out of circulation but haven’t been burned.
3. $55M in monthly payroll
Zebec now processes $55M in payroll a month for 16,000 employees across 271 enterprise clients. Card volume has reached $72.3M.
4. Back on Bundesliga matchday
Zebec appeared during Mainz 05 vs Bayern Munich on Nov 7, continuing its football campaign with Tangem (@Tangem) and Stellar (@StellarOrg) stellar:native.
5. Institutional event at DAS London
Today, Zebec is hosting an event on on-chain finance in London during Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit. Speakers come from Midnight Network, Caleb & Brown and Frame. Zebec has also hinted at “news.”
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
Kicking off DAS week in London. 🇬🇧
Our CEO @simonb_ldn joined the Digital Money Association’s flagship event for a panel on stablecoins, liquidity and cross-border payments.
For Zebec, that work starts with how businesses pay their teams around the world.
Obviously, the next milestones for $ZBCN could be $0.05 and then $0.10, but the ultimate target is $0.15.
This is exactly how XRP started back in the day. I believe many XRP holders could eventually turn their attention towards $ZBCN.
$ZBCN is a real utility token, and we’ve already seen its price respond positively to major announcements and developments. More importantly, Zebec continues to work hard to deliver value for its holders, and we’ve seen tangible progress.
For me, it’s not just about promises or hype. It’s about execution, utility and consistent delivery. That’s what makes $ZBCN worth watching.
Do you believe $XRP could experience a sudden overnight price explosion?
Personally, I believe $XRP has the potential to increase 10x or even 25x, but I don’t believe in a magical overnight switch. In my opinion, it’s all about real-world utility, adoption and growing demand.
If you bought $XRP purely because you were expecting an overnight switch that would suddenly make the price explode, then perhaps you bought the wrong asset for the wrong reasons.
Utility and adoption will drive $XRP’s long-term value, not hype or overnight expectations.
#XRP #XRPCommunity #XRPL #XRPArmy
1
181
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
🔴 TÜM ALTCOIN SAHİPLERİ SÖZLERİMİ İYİ DİNLEYİN!
Çünkü ben bu saatten sonra yalnızca bir tahmin paylaşmıyorum…
KENDİ İTİBARIMI VE 9 YILLIK EMEĞİMİ ORTAYA KOYUYORUM!
SOL’u 5 dolardan, AVAX’ı 2 dolardan, XRP’yi 0,50 dolardan, MATIC’i 0,003 dolardan verdim.
Bundan 3 yıl önce 8.000 dolar seviyesinde olan bakiyemi 2,5 milyon doların üzerine taşıdım.
Önümüzdeki üç ay benim için de piyasa için de belirleyici olacak.
🔴 KASIM — ARALIK — OCAK
Bitcoin → 180.000$
Ethereum → 10.000$
Altcoinlerde → 60X BAŞLANGIÇ.
Bazı coinlerde 100X, 150X, 200X+ göreceğiz.
OCAK AYINA KADAR BU İŞ BİTECEK…
Bu dediklerim gerçekleşmezse 9 yıldır emek verdiğim bu işi bırakacağım ve X hesabımı KALICI OLARAK SİLECEĞİM!
Bu sözleri unutmayın.
Ekran görüntüsü alın.
Tarihi not edin.
Çünkü piyasa döndüğünde herkes geçmişte ne kadar haklı olduğunu anlatacak…
AMA EKRAN GÖRÜNTÜLERİ YALAN SÖYLEMEZ!
Zirveyi kaçırmak istemiyorsanız beni takip edin.
Ücretsiz telegram grubuma katılın: t.me/+sSlo6ESK92ExZjc0
FİNALDE GÖRÜŞMEK ÜZERE…
What if Ripple is deliberately leading retail investors to believe that $XRP is no longer the asset worth investing in, while something else is happening behind the scenes?
There’s an old saying: “While they point you in one direction, pay attention to what’s happening in the other.”
Could Ripple be directing the community’s attention away from $XRP while pursuing a bigger strategy that we haven’t yet understood?
I’m not making accusations, but I believe these questions deserve honest answers. Are we looking at the bigger picture, or are we missing something right in front of us?
Perhaps the real story isn’t what we’re being shown, but what we’re not being told.
#XRPArmy #XRP
Is Ripple prioritising its own business over $XRP?
This is one of the strongest concerns.
Ripple is expanding into:
RLUSD stablecoin.
Institutional custody.
Banking and financial infrastructure.
Cross-border payments.
Tokenisation and institutional finance.
These businesses can make Ripple extremely successful without necessarily creating equivalent demand for $XRP.
That distinction is critical. Owning $XRP does not mean owning shares in Ripple.
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
If I ran payroll at a company like ADP or a global bank like HSBC, I'd be studying what @Zebec_HQ is building right now.
Not because legacy rails are broken. Because the next generation of workers will expect to choose how they get paid: bank deposit, stablecoin, or card, all from one payroll run.
Zebec already does this in production:
• 20+ enterprise accounts running payroll on Stellar
• Bank and stablecoin payroll from one platform
• Support across 20+ chains
• KYC/AML built into the stack
Incumbents have the distribution. Crypto-native teams have the rails. The winners will be the ones who connect the two first.
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Democrats win both the US House and Senate, seizing control from Republicans.
🚀$X + $Y = $Z 🟢🟡🟣🚀🕛 retweeted
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
PROPOSED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
XRP PURCHASERS AND INVESTORS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Plaintiffs,
v.
RIPPLE LABS, INC., BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE, AND OTHER RESPONSIBLE EXECUTIVES,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR ALLEGED INVESTOR DECEPTION, MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION, FRAUDULENT OMISSIONS, AND RELATED VIOLATIONS OF LAW
Proposed pleading for investigation and review by qualified securities litigation counsel.
⸻
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This action arises from an alleged disconnect between Ripple Labs, Inc.‘s public representations concerning the importance of XRP to its corporate strategy and the company’s subsequent commercial decisions, particularly the development, promotion, and integration of its RLUSD stablecoin.
For years, Ripple’s leadership has publicly communicated that XRP is fundamental to the company’s purpose, strategy, and commercial future.
Ripple CEO Bradley Garlinghouse has characterized XRP as the company’s North Star and has stated that all roads lead back to XRP.
Among the statements attributed to Ripple’s leadership are:
“All roads lead to XRP.”
“XRP is at the center of everything we do.”
“XRP is our North Star.”
These representations were made by individuals with direct knowledge of Ripple’s corporate strategy and carried significant weight among members of the XRP investment community.
Plaintiffs allege that such representations helped establish an expectation that Ripple’s commercial expansion, institutional relationships, payment infrastructure, and growing financial services business would translate into meaningful adoption and utilization of XRP.
However, Ripple subsequently developed and expanded RLUSD, a dollar-backed stablecoin that can facilitate payment and settlement transactions without necessarily requiring XRP to function as the bridge asset.
Plaintiffs contend that Ripple’s leadership should be required to explain whether the company’s actual commercial strategy was consistent with the expectations created by its repeated public representations.
The central issue is not whether Ripple has the right to develop RLUSD. It does. The issue is whether investors were provided a materially accurate picture of XRP’s actual role in Ripple’s commercial strategy while those investments were being solicited and traded.
I am respectfully calling on @bgarlinghouse ,@JoelKatz and the @Ripple team to host an open X Space and speak directly to the #XRPArmy.
If we have misunderstood the bigger picture, explain it to us. Address the concerns, provide clarity and, most importantly, let your actions speak louder than silence.
Continued uncertainty could seriously damage confidence in $XRP and Ripple, potentially extending beyond retail investors to institutional trust.
Media interviews are not enough. We want a direct conversation, honest answers and accountability.
Seven years of loyalty deserve more than silence. Brad and David, the community is asking. Will you show up?
$XRP COMMUNITY POLL
Are you disappointed with XRP’s current direction and performance and what came out from SWELL?
51%Bullish holding strong.
26%Still holding, not happy
23%Time to move on
47 votes • Final results 2
1
680
Should Ripple clarify its apparent shift in focus from institutional to retail $XRP adoption, as recently was mentioned by David former CTO?
Survey options:
1- Yes, we deserve an explanation.
2- Yes, institutional adoption should remain the priority.
3- No, both approaches complement each other.
4 I'm confused and need more clarity.
8
7
932





















