1/
Official community proposal thread.
I want to put a clear economic idea in front of the $EGLD community.
A security model that is realistically only possible on MultiversX because of our low hardware costs and high validator count.
7/
This is not a promise.
It is not hopium.
It is a concrete design the community can debate, refine, and eventually vote on.
The opportunity is there.
8/
Let’s make $EGLD E-GOLD again.
Not by waiting.
By designing the economics properly.
Community — this is the conversation we should be having.
Demand better.
1/
I’d like to challenge anybody.
Show me a better security model that is realistically only possible on $EGLD.
Low hardware requirements + high speed is like going from dial-up modem to fibre.
The question is: how do we monetise and market that strength? Through tokenomics!
5/
This is not a promise.
It is not speculation.
It is a commitment the community can demand:
Pay security properly in real terms.
Let price success reduce dilution.
Turn the low-hardware advantage into actual economic strength
6/
Let’s make $EGLD E-GOLD again.
Not by hoping.
By designing it that way.
The opportunity is there.
The structural advantage is real.
Community — time to demand it.
1/
Please ask Grok this exact question:
“What if a blockchain paid validators $150 worth of its own token every month, based on real costs, instead of endless inflation?”
Then read the answer.
This is the model MultiversX could run better than almost anyone. Thead 1/7
6/
What the community actually gets:
Stronger security when markets are bad
Lower inflation as the network succeeds
Less reliance on foundation-controlled emissions
Clearer scarcity
Rewards still paid in EGLD.
Just smarter.
7/
Sentiment is bad right now for real reasons.
No point pretending otherwise.
But the low hardware cost is still a genuine advantage.
Used correctly it can deliver something rare:
High security + low inflation + broad participation.
That’s the model.
$EGLD