Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain) header
Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain) profile picture

UK scientists confident that our talented science community will continue to thrive outside the political structures of the EU. #ScientistsforBritain #GoWTO

United Kingdom
Joined July 2015
Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)Photo by Scientists for Britain (@ScienceBritain)
Scientists for Britain retweeted
This is essential information. The EU and sadly the UK have been bankrolling Russian arms factories by buying Russian oil and gas. Sometimes directly sometimes via intermediaries but it’s the same effect. It must change.
4
5
326
Scientists for Britain retweeted
The EU is ignoring the Russian fuel ban and paying billions to Moscow. Very unhelpful actions by the EU. They are funding the wrong side. When will the BBC and the rest of our largely pro-EU media in the UK start reporting this? euobserver.com/231924/banned…
4
4
243
Scientists for Britain retweeted
It should be regarded as treason for British politicians to pretend to negotiate in the British interest but in reality to sell us out to the EU and cost us £20 billion along the way - this EU Reset is a total disgrace youtu.be/uET-xONTW-0?is=Xokb…
11
180
2
271
4,943
Scientists for Britain retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,472
167,036
39,442
800,683
175,437,889
Scientists for Britain retweeted
This is a subsidy farm, not a solar farm. Without government subsidies it would not be built. Your taxes are subsidising farmland destruction.
This month the Energy Secretary approved his third large solar farm in a fortnight, one of them on prime farmland across Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire that his own inspectors told him to refuse. They walked the site. They said no. He signed it anyway. So here's the grand plan. Take some of the best food-growing soil in England, ground that has fed people for a thousand years, and bury it under glass panels shipped in from China to catch the famous Lincolnshire sunshine. In a country where the sun knocks off mid-afternoon for half the winter and turns up for roughly eleven per cent of the year, we are concreting over arable land to harvest photons that mostly aren't there. A British solar field spends most of its life doing an impression of a very expensive greenhouse with the plants missing. The panels tilt hopefully at a grey sky. The soil beneath them, some of the finest in the country, sits in the dark for forty years quietly learning to be a car park. And it doesn't come back. Not in your lifetime. They are making a permanent decision about a temporary energy fashion, on ground you cannot un-glass, against the written advice of the men they pay to give it, in the same fortnight the same government swears food security keeps it awake at night. Sunniest idea they've had all year.
73
911
18
2,031
42,520
Scientists for Britain retweeted
We must not hinder economic growth by embarking on an expensive reset with the EU. The people voted for Brexit. The consensus is the UK should remain outside the EU.
8
32
2
70
1,197
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Euro MP on a subsidised trip to Iceland to sway their referendum on whether Icelanders should give up their hard-fought independence and their ability to hire and fire the people who rule over them. Election interference, but with the Brussels seal of approval.
Hello from Reykjavík! 🇮🇸 This August, Iceland will vote a referendum on the resumption of European Union membership negotiations. This could mean that they could pick up the process of becoming a new member of the EU!
1
9
24
1,203
Scientists for Britain retweeted
If it turns out the EU was the problem all along, what are we going to do with all those overpaid experts who said the precise opposite?
71
133
11
471
19,553
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Sounds great until they realise the last Government rewrote UK defence procurement law to mimic EU law - even placing a line of EU treaty text in UK statute. Mimicking EU law makes it difficult to create UK-limited contract competitions.
Exclusive: Ministers will use national security exemptions to ensure that billions of pounds of additional funding for defence is spent in Britain rather than given to American or European companies John Healey, the defence secretary, will use a speech at the GMB union’s congress to announce plans to favour British-based companies He will add that if a defence contract is “sent overseas”, the industry will be required to create jobs in the UK, describing the approach as “unashamedly pro-Britain”. He will say: “The government will develop a new approach that looks to give credit in future defence contract decisions to British-based companies based on a genuine, substantive presence in Britain and long-term commitments to British communities and British supply chains. “As part of this drive, I can announce I will make greater use of national security exemptions for defence contracts — which allow the government to require certain capabilities to be built in Britain — supporting our UK industrial base and your members’ jobs. “We will ensure that, in large defence contracts, there are provisions to require any significant sub-contracts to be placed with UK-based companies, or guarantee competitions so UK competitors aren’t shut out.” thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
1
3
12
565
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Keir Starmer is expected to SURRENDER to EU demands and allow EU students to pay less to attend UK universities, effectively subsidised by British taxpayers. Question: Is Starmer right to surrender?
0%Yes, let’s surrender
80%No, don’t surrender
20%Don’t know
5 votes • Final results
1
101
Scientists for Britain retweeted
UK ministers consider lowering university fees for EU students - 🙄 Which part of the word "Broke" does this government not understand? ft.com/content/c746eb1a-f3e2… via @FT
23
159
7
528
53,808
Scientists for Britain retweeted
For once, this Miliband madness WAS in Labour’s manifesto… But not its costs. Revealed: Over £200bn and nearly ¼ m jobs are at stake with the ‘Energy Independence Bill’. Ideological extremism and what it could cost the country: facts4eu.org/news/2026_jun_m… Please re-post !
20
1
24
798
Scientists for Britain retweeted
There is a tradition of unpopular governments showing restraint to avoid further public anger. Yet Keir Starmer is doing the opposite, rushing to complete an unpopular EU Partnership Bill which 'effectively reverses Brexit' – as Dr @DansBoucher explains. briefingsforbritain.co.uk/la…
2
11
9
757
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Starmer’s desperate EU convergence plans have a defence component, as economist @Bob_Lyddon reminds us here: “The latest proposed reconvergences will involve re-alignment with EU rules and participation in new EU shadow debt schemes for defence spending.” politeia.co.uk/cementing-bri…
3
5
262
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Astonishing... From 1973 to 2010, *we paid the EEC/EU* in today's money, £500 billion to take away a cumulative £3.5 TRILLION of manufacturing GDP from us. 3.5 million jobs were lost. #Brexit #LabourWipeout
54
523
37
997
30,164
Scientists for Britain retweeted
🚨 Starmer’s Big Answer Is More Europe — No Wonder Voters Are Walking Away He claims Brexit made Britain poorer. But since the Brexit vote: UK real GDP: +12.1% Germany real GDP: +6.0% So why is Starmer treating Brussels like the answer? 🗞️ Read more - link in next post 👇
70
569
21
1,249
18,494
Scientists for Britain retweeted
This is well worth reading - whether you are a minister, opposition politician or anyone trying to understand the UK's energy vulnerability and how we address that. The exec summary alone is hugely informative and well-argued. Congrats to @CeeMacBee and co-authors. ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Here is my new paper for the Great British Business Council on the importance of oil, gas and coal to the UK economy. The UK’s industrial decline is not inevitable, but the result of decades of deliberate policy choices that have undermined domestic energy production and driven manufacturing offshore. Lowering UK employment and tax revenues, while increasing the UK trade deficit. The paper also includes a plan to reverse this. gbbc.uk/uk-deindustrialisati…
17
290
2
870
55,305
Scientists for Britain retweeted
Dr. Angus Dalgleish — one of Britain’s most respected oncologists and immunologists — is sounding a serious alarm. He warns that we’ve entered a new dark age in universities, scientific research, and government, driven by political correctness and woke ideology. Dalgleish calls it a cancer that has infected the heart of academia and the soul of the civil service. Political correctness, he says, is fundamentally anti-scientific: it decides in advance what you’re allowed to say, observe, and conclude. Truth becomes secondary to dogma. He compares the current denial to alcoholism — nothing gets fixed until institutions first admit there’s a deep problem. It’s a sobering warning from a senior scientist who has watched the rot spread for years. The clip is only 1:56 long, but it hits hard. Are we already too far gone, or is there still time to push back before these institutions completely lose their ability to seek truth?
131
2,612
100
7,260
163,160
Scientists for Britain retweeted
And at 9.30pm the UK is importing 20% of its electricity from the Europe. 10% is coming from France alone. 🤔
Britain is presently generating 71% of electricity from renewables and is exporting some to boot. Nuclear plus renewables is presently 85% of all electricity being generated. Good things are possible. Ignore the boomer Murdoch press.
26
93
3
312
15,590