Check out this outstanding interview from my colleague @JohnE_Fabb

Obama used to say he wasn’t a king and that he couldn’t just change immigration law by himself. Then he did it anyway. In 2012 his DHS put out a memo and created DACA, handing work permits and protection from deportation to hundreds of thousands of people who entered the country illegally. Congress never passed it. The courts have said it doesn’t fit the immigration laws on the books. The Supreme Court never ruled that it was legal. Democrats have spent years defending it like it’s settled law instead of an executive workaround they liked. One of the people who got that status is Miguel Alonso Maldonado Soriano. He came illegally in 1999, got DACA under Obama, kept it under Biden, and lost it this year. Then he took a sledgehammer to the Iwo Jima monument. They called people like him Dreamers and treated the program like a moral good. He used his time here to smash a memorial to the Marines who raised the flag at Iwo Jima. Obama said he couldn’t act like a king, then did, and Democrats have had no problem with any of it. No Marchs, No protests , not a peep, That’s the record, end #DACA now …

BREAKING NEWS FIFTH CIRCUIT: NO BOND HEARINGS FOR ILLEGAL ENTRANTS Today the full Fifth Circuit ended it, 10 to 7. Three men who entered illegally and had lived here for years got a district judge to order them released and force ICE to give them bond hearings. The en banc court reversed all three and vacated the 90-day bond hearing rule the panel made up in July. Congress wrote the law in 1996. If you entered without being inspected, you are an applicant for admission, and you are detained while your removal case plays out. The statute says nothing about bond hearings. Judges don't get to add them. The court also said detention pending removal doesn't violate due process as long as it ends in removal or release. The mandate issues forthwith. It's effective now. Seven judges dissented and wanted to keep the hearings. Read the opinion and see who wrote what:
s3.documentcloud.org/documen… @Phase2Deport

He wanted a better life , he needed asylum. Our immigration system failed ! What other talking points did I miss ?

🫖🫖Morning tea🫖🫖 @GovSherrillNJ passed a law California already lost in court Governor Sherrill banned masks on federal agents. California tried the same stunt. A federal court blocked its mask law, and on Oct 14 the Ninth Circuit unanimously blocked its law forcing agents to show ID. So what did NJ do? New Jersey copied homework and the wrong answers too. The ruling goes back to 1819. A state does not get to tell federal officers how to do federal work. I did that work for 24 years, and no governor ever wrote my rules. New Jersey taxpayers will pay for the lawsuit you're asking for. @GovernorSherrill, @AGDavenport @njassemblydems @NJAssemblyGOP

Another amazing project from the @ItsYourGov staff !

🚨🚨 Hochul called the Medicaid fraud probe "political." Now she's announcing the fraud herself. In March, Dr. Oz sent Hochul 50 questions and a 30-day deadline. She said the Trump administration was targeting New York for political reasons. Her office said Washington wanted to rip health care away from New Yorkers. Now she's talking about money laundering, kickbacks and improper billing in adult daycare, and says she went to Oz to team up. Nobody partnered with her. She got caught. A $68 million adult daycare kickback scheme in Brooklyn already ended in guilty pleas. The State never got ahead of the problem , the Feds did and now she’s trying to save her political career

It’s NYC aka: Gotham , this guy has probably been through the system a dozen or so times and will continue to cause harm to others. He needs medical care. @NYCMayor @JumaaneWilliams I didn’t see the presser ? Could you send me a link ? PS: The Agent is a NYer….

I've stated this on multiple occasions, the fraud committed is astronomical

AMERICAN JOBS FOR AMERICANS. THAT SHOULD NOT BE A CONTROVERSIAL SENTENCE. Tomorrow night I’m at the @UFCR University of Florida’s Levin College of Law and this is where I start: American jobs go to Americans first. In 2015, Disney laid off about 250 IT workers in Orlando. Some had to train their replacements to keep their severance. The replacements came through outsourcing firms that run on H-1B visas. Last week the White House accused Microsoft of laying off 6,000 Americans in a year while collecting 6,300 H-1B visas, and suspended it from the green card program. We have millions of capable workers in our own yards, and their families borrowed six figures to get them qualified. No US company should be outsourcing their jobs while we have qualified Americans. @Phase2Deport

NEW YORK POLITICIANS HAVE SPENT A DECADE PROTECTING ILLEGAL ALIENS FROM THE LAW. NOW THEY WANT YOUR LOCAL GARAGE OWNER TO HELP. Sanctuary laws passed, starting under de Blasio. Then Mamdani takes City Hall, says ICE shouldn’t exist, and calls it “rotten to its core.” Now he, Schumer and Jeffries put their names on a letter to private business owners: “do not rent, lend, or otherwise make your property available to ICE.” Elected officials asking citizens to help shut a federal law enforcement agency out of their city. Think about that. In 2020, New York went to court to keep illegal aliens in the census count that decides House seats and federal money. That’s their own case, on the record. They tell you it’s about community safety. Ask who is safer. Not the victim of the criminal alien they wouldn’t hand over. Not the officer being told he’s unwelcome in a parking lot. They never have to confess. Every excuse wears out, and the next demand is bigger. You tell me what they’re protecting.

You said at the University of Chicago on October 13th that a Democratic Congress should pursue “signature cases” not just against the president but “on the people who enabled him.” You then stated the purpose explicitly: “I want young people coming out of school to say, ‘Should I go work for the Trump administration? Like, that sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.’ I want them to be like, ‘Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don’t want, and so let me avoid participating in that.’ I want that deterrence message.”That is not a statement about prosecuting proven crimes. It is a stated intention to use the prospect of investigation and legal trouble to discourage young people from considering public service in an administration they support. When challenged, you reframed the remarks as applying only to people who “break the law” or aid in “stealing taxpayer money.” The original comment did not contain that limitation; the deterrence of prospective hires was the point you emphasized. Holding individuals accountable for actual violations of law is ordinary. Treating service in a lawfully elected administration itself as the trigger for “signature cases” and a deliberate “deterrence message” to keep people out of government is something else. The candor gap is between those two descriptions of your position.