Mr Balistic

King George VI, private letter, 1922: The snippet of the letter reads: “I am sure the British Israelite business is true. I have read a lot about it lately and everything no matter how large or small points to our being ‘the Chosen Race’.” Source: The Independent, 6 April 1996, Ireland. #2954 page 19. archive.org/details/Independ…

Himmler (alongside Göring) of disloyalty, secret negotiations without authorization, and illegally trying to seize power. Walter Schellenberg (high ranking SS who headed the foreign intelligence section of the SD) actively urged Himmler to pursue separate Western peace contacts against Hitler’s knowledge and wishes and prioritized his own survival and deals over unconditional loyalty. Karl Wolff, High-ranking SS and former chief of Himmler’s personal staff, claimed on July 20 (1944): In his memoirs that Schellenberg’s people had informed Himmler in advance of the assassination plan on Hitler, that Himmler already possessed intelligence summaries on the conspirators. SS intelligence officer Wilhelm Höttl claimed Himmler had prior knowledge of the July 20 plot and deliberately held back. According to Wilhelm Wulff (Himmler’s personal astrologer) Himmler was considering his own coup plans (discussed in April–May 1944) and wanted to know whether Hitler would die by assassination. Wulff wrote that Himmler hoped an assassination attempt might remove Hitler for him, so he would not have to carry out his own projected putsch. Himmler’s main questions to him were “How will the Führer die?” and “How long will he live?” advice to overthrow Hitler, Himmler deliberately waiting on 20 July.

There is no Italian Odin. The Romans practiced interpretatio romana: they identified foreign gods with their own based on shared functions or attribute. The picture on the left is the English King Woden (two eyes), said to have lived around 400 AD. A king-list made in the 700s puts him as a king who fathered the branches that later ruled different parts of England, besides Essex. Hengest was the first English king; he founded Kent, in the south-east. The old lists put Woden only three generations before him. Meanwhile King Odin, in the picture on the right (one eye): in 3 out of 4 of the earliest main books of the Vikings, they thought Odin migrated from the Troy / Tyrkland region about 70–60 BC, and that his great-grandson Fróði was a Danish king when Jesus was born. That is 500 years before English Woden, whom they also like to connect to Odin. English Woden has no stories that match Odin’s story of being one-eyed, hanging from a tree, with crows. Pagan reconstructionists like to connect him to the Norse religion. This was also before the Norman invasions of old England. Picture on the left dates to about 1153–1166 which shows King Woden's branches. Right (Icelandic Óðinn) 1765–1766.

Truth about Congo... What you know is a lie There were only around 1,000 Europeans in the entire Congo Free State at its peak — mostly officers and administrators stuck in remote outposts, far from the villages. That’s straight from contemporary counts in the 1890s–1900s records. They had just helped free large parts of the region from the Arab/Muslim slave trade that had been raiding and shipping people out for decades. The Congo basin before 1885 was a brutal place: constant intertribal wars, slave raids, and documented cannibalism in several tribes. Missionaries and explorers on the ground at the time wrote about it in their letters — including practices where cannibals would break all four limbs of a person (including kids) and leave them alive in streams for up to three days to tenderize the flesh. It was a hellhole. King Leopold II set up the Congo Free State as a private venture. The deal was straightforward and practical: the local population would gather rubber and ivory. In return, the Europeans would invest resources to build the foundations of a modern country from absolute scratch — roads, railways, outposts, and eventually the basics of schools, hospitals, and law and order. This wasn’t some made-up fairy tale. It was a trade-off in a massive, ungoverned territory with zero modern infrastructure. The Europeans had no choice but to work with the people on the ground. They hired and trained local Black soldiers (the Force Publique) to handle enforcement, stop Arab slavers, deal with cannibal tribes, and bring basic law and order. With only a few hundred white officers overseeing up to 20,000 local troops, they were based far away in isolated outposts, not living in or patrolling most villages. These soldiers came from the same rough local groups — some with cannibal backgrounds and very different mindsets from 19th-century Christian Europe. The Europeans were trying to work with the troops they had and gradually bring stability. The famous hand-cutting policy started for one very practical reason: bullets. Imported cartridges were expensive. European officers gave clear instructions — bring back one severed hand per bullet fired as proof you didn’t waste them on hunting, sport, or fun. Bullets were meant for real threats — Arab enslavers, cannibal raids, and maintaining order — not for targeting workers in some evil white-man-enslaving scheme. That’s in the original Force Publique orders and agent reports from the time. It was never about cutting hands off workers to slow production. That would be stupid — it destroys your own labor force. Soldiers were supposed to get rubber. When rubber quotas weren’t being met, the drop in production set off alarms in the distant outposts. That’s what triggered the Europeans to investigate why. Some of those African soldiers had started cutting hands from villagers just to give an excuse for the bullets they fired, without thinking about the long-term damage it would do to the workforce and rubber supply. Missionaries and priests (many Protestant) went into villages and were shocked by what they saw. They sent letters home. White communities in Europe and America read those first-hand reports and demanded action. Leopold himself called the hand-cutting “stupid” and “idiotic” — it was counterproductive and hurt the very development he was trying to build. The international outrage from the West forced Belgium to take the Free State away from Leopold in 1908 and reform it under direct Belgian rule. That’s when more schools, hospitals, and law and order really scaled up. Yes, diseases were spreading — sleeping sickness epidemics were already hitting the region before the Europeans arrived. The population was massive and scattered deep in the bush. The tiny number of whites in distant outposts didn’t personally spread every death. What had happened did disrupt some farming and worsen famine in places, but the baseline chaos (slave raids, cannibalism, intertribal fighting) had been killing huge numbers for a long time already. The Europeans had every incentive to keep workers healthy and fed — dead people don’t gather rubber or build a country. The death toll numbers thrown around today (1 million to 10 million or even higher) are impossible to verify. There was no census. Pre-colonial population estimates were rough traveler guesses. Excess deaths include violence, famine, and disease — a lot of it pre-dating the rubber system and made worse by the disruption and not every death belongs at Leopold’s feet. The headline “10 million” figure that stuck in modern history books was popularized decades later in 1998 by Adam Hochschild (a Jewish author) in his book King Leopold’s Ghost. He took earlier varying estimates and framed it as roughly half the population wiped out. That’s the “years later” version that turned into the mainstream story most people hear today. What the African soldiers did to their own people behind the officers’ backs was on them — not some satanic mastermind plot by a few distant whites. The Europeans walked into a brutal place, stopped the Arab slave trade (sometimes fighting alongside local groups, including cannibal tribes, against the Muslim raiders who also used cannibal auxiliaries), and started building something modern in return for resources. It wasn’t perfect. It was rough. But it was the start of roads, rails, hospitals, schools, and order where none existed. The modern push to paint this as “white men evil” ignores the first-hand letters, the tiny numbers on the ground, the pre-colonial reality, and the practical reasons behind the policies. It changes history to fit an agenda. The Congo Free State wasn’t paradise, but it wasn’t the genocide cartoon either. The real story from the people who were actually there is more complicated, more honest, and a lot less about demonizing one group. What do you think? Have the history books been twisted to push a narrative? @SankaraDispatch