Gaming Critic and ruffler of Industry feathers. Business email: [email protected] Public Discord: https://xitter.cf/t.co/wWo4pxxY4U

That place and the thing
Joined April 2015
Ok. That was good. I'll admit it. Well done, guys.
An important statement from Yogscast Games.
3
1
66
1,251
Damn. Forgot how dry my throat gets after talking for that long...
1
3
59
924
You know, after thinking about it, Acerthorn DID make some provably false statements of fact in his defamation lawsuit against me... Wondering if turnabout is fair play here... Something to consider.
No I've discussed just such a thing with the attorney and this is the pitfall of California code in regard to defamation suits. Given the specifics of my case, there aren't any applicable statutes that would award fee recovery against Acerthorn. PLUS he's broke.
8
5
103
1,479
Not a huge fan like the malfoid people but you bastards have been on my feed all goddamn day so I'll say this. She'd have that leg wrapped around him and you fucking know it. Good day.
Malfoy got distracted
3
5
85
1,322
Spending the day working on the deep dive discussion on the Acerthorn defamation suit now that it's over. Having to script this one as I have to be VERY careful how I phrase things given it's almost a certainty he'll sue me over this one too. Still, this stuff needs to be said.
3
8
90
1,276
BUT, if Acerthorn fucking tries anyways... Guess whose state got a brand spanking new anti-slapp law that went into effect January 1st!
LAWSUIT UPDATE: Because I un-privated the Acerthorn videos after he LOST his Defamation suit against me, it seems he thinks that will allow him to try and sue me all over again in Idaho. Thing is, it doesn't work that way. It's the same video(s), not reuploads. SO single ...cont.
10
5
118
1,879
Also, if you want to see how ALL of this started... youtu.be/WB-Xd1qDKIY
LAWSUIT UPDATE: Because I un-privated the Acerthorn videos after he LOST his Defamation suit against me, it seems he thinks that will allow him to try and sue me all over again in Idaho. Thing is, it doesn't work that way. It's the same video(s), not reuploads. SO single ...cont.
2
13
79
2,324
LAWSUIT UPDATE: Because I un-privated the Acerthorn videos after he LOST his Defamation suit against me, it seems he thinks that will allow him to try and sue me all over again in Idaho. Thing is, it doesn't work that way. It's the same video(s), not reuploads. SO single ...cont.
5
22
1
331
20,801
publication rule applies. Statute of limitations still applies as the clock starts when the video is FIRST PUBLISHED. The videos are completely unmodified so no exception from substantial modification or aiming to reach a significantly different audience exists. Get fucked, David
3
7
127
3,054
No I've discussed just such a thing with the attorney and this is the pitfall of California code in regard to defamation suits. Given the specifics of my case, there aren't any applicable statutes that would award fee recovery against Acerthorn. PLUS he's broke.
Replying to @SidAlpha
Can you sue him to recover some of your money? Lawyers ain't cheap.
5
4
1
87
3,321
Dude, ALL of the X-Wing novels were absolute bangers. And Stackpole wrote FOUR of them. Not just 2. Aaron Allston wrote the Wraith Squadron novels that followed them and those were exceptional as well. The two collaborated with each other on the series, too.
There are really people out there that have no clue that Michael A. Stackpole wrote two of the greatest Star Wars books ever back to back for the same series.
6
36
1,124
Dude, tip of the iceberg. A few of my friends asked me why I didn't critique the movies with how much I bitched about them. My response was "Because the critiques would be twice as long as the movies themselves."
“There was too much Vader in him.” You mean the same Vader that at the climax Luke literally threw down his lightsaber before and refused to fight because he knew there was still good in his soul? That Vader? Dumbest writing in history, and it’s not even close.
3
3
58
1,325
No matter how many times Acerthorn has been called a piece of shit, it will likely never be enough. It is also, unfortunately, an insult to all myriad forms of shit everywhere in the world.
Replying to @alt_Psymon
Acerthorn files all of his lawsuits in forma pauperis (in the form of a pauper), meaning he does not have to pay the court filing fees. He also files everything pro se, meaning he represents himself. It literally costs him $0 to weaponize the legal system and target his critics.
4
3
85
1,361
How about... instead of raising prices the Corpos could focus on creating games that are actually good and that run well. They could get some brand recognition and save on advertising budgets instead. ;)
Warhorse Studios' co-founder hopes GTA 6 will enable other games to sell for higher prices "Hopefully GTA will blaze the trail, and it will allow us to increase the cost"
10
11
126
2,335
Only 44 million? I'd keep looking.
Facebook could face up to $219 billion in penalties over violations involving users’ personal information At $5,000 each, a jury found nearly 44 million violations
1
37
1,046
4 years and 8 months. That's how long I've been under some form of lawsuit by that psychopath Acerthorn. First for Copyright Infringement which was designed to silence, punish, destroy, and unjustly enrich himself and then for Defamation for more of the same.
Judge denied his request within minutes. Seemingly, the Judge is done with his bullshit. David will undoubtedly file an appeal but for the first time in YEARS I am not currently being sued by Acerthorn. Working on a video that will deep dive the allegations and the truth.
14
14
1
230
5,091
Judge denied his request within minutes. Seemingly, the Judge is done with his bullshit. David will undoubtedly file an appeal but for the first time in YEARS I am not currently being sued by Acerthorn. Working on a video that will deep dive the allegations and the truth.
Stebbins v. Redfield (3:23-cv-00321) aka Acerthorn v @SidAlpha Acer has filed a motion to leave to file Motion for Reconsideration after his recent Dismissal loss in his lawsuit against Sid.
19
24
2
233
9,260
Yes, Acerthorn. This came from me. No, my Attorney did not know about it. Why? Because it is material to the lawsuit filed against @Spectre_Report. Acerthorn has been storing the data for his MANY lawsuits on an external drive that has seemingly failed. Can you say "spoilation"?
Update to David Stebbins's (@acerthorn ) silly little glitch of his silly little "active cases folder" of his silly little vexatious litigation drive. He confirmed it was a full-blown drive failure. Now I need to file a supplement.
5
6
1
75
5,228