Titus Smiles

Brother Saasi Marvin, regarding this clip, it was cut and edited taking it out of context. Back then I wasn’t even born again. I remember I was a People Power supporter and I was among those who vigorously criticised Apostle Grace over what he said (which I regretted later) on my Facebook page despite the ministry coming out publicly to apologise to the public. We need to learn to forgive and forget especially when certain issues have been publicly addressed and apologies made. I honestly don’t see the reason you have to keep bringing up the same clip over and over again when the matter was addressed and settled a long time ago. Thank you.

I have watched with considerable interest the criticism directed at Apostle Grace Lubega for attending a PLU meeting of religious leaders. And I ask, since when did the presence of a man of God at a political gathering become evidence of the surrender of his conscience? Those who condemn him must answer a few questions. When biblical prophets confronted kings, were they endorsing their kingdoms? When Nathan approached David, did he become an accomplice to David's transgressions? When Daniel served in the courts of Babylon, did he abandon his God? We must distinguish access from allegiance, engagement from endorsement, and presence from political submission. A pastor is a citizen before the law, a spiritual leader before his congregation, and a moral voice within society. His calling does not extinguish his constitutional freedoms. Indeed, if religious leaders must only engage those whose politics they approve of, who then shall speak truth to those with whom they disagree? Judge the substance of his engagement, the independence of his voice and the consistency of his conduct. For a society that demands religious leaders influence national affairs while condemning them for entering the rooms where national affairs are discussed suffers from a profound contradiction. And I leave his critics with one question: If you forbid the shepherd from entering the corridors of power, by what means do you expect him to confront the wolves who occupy them? Over to you.

You aren’t our kind. The father i know apostle grace, if he taught you well,you wouldn’t send such a post.

Papa, when I was told that you had attended that meeting, I told my colleagues that you were obeying powers and principalities, just as you have always taught us. But when I listened to your submission, I was heartbroken. The fact that it was another pastor who spoke about political prisoners, while you, my spiritual father who leads one of the largest youthful congregations said that “PLU is not known to be an abusive and subversive party,” broke my heart even more. Papa, you know that the young people in your church are informed and intelligent. They have phones. They see the videos of abductions involving men in military uniforms acting under the authority of the very people you were praising. Papa, you teach us to let God fight our battles. Yet at that same meeting, you raised the issue of Gashumba’s statements about our church before PLU leaders in a manner that sounded like you were asking them to take action against him. Papa, you have hurt thousands of young people, including those who may never have the courage to write a post like this. We forgive you. We will still come to church, sit in our usual seats, worship God and listen to your sermons. But Papa, forgiveness does not mean we were not hurt. And remaining in church does not mean we agree with everything you said. @Phanerookampala

Una go dey cry Islamophobia whatever but it's 2026 and it's not even remotely possible for a Christian to be electable to anything in countries like Pakistan, Saudi, UAE

Soon we shall sponsor Arsenal or Manchester City This is a great milestone towards marketing destination Uganda

Official statement on the freshers ball clash between the Guild President and artist Fik Fameica at the Freshers’ Ball. “The Guild President's speech was repeatedly postponed without a clear explanation which was later established to be political. The Guild leadership made continuous demands to have the President speak early enough but these concerns were frustrated by security and the programme managers who had alternatively suggested that the Guild President's speech should be delivered before the performance of the highlight artist of the day as a way of closing the event instead. However, upon the artist's arrival at the venue, the Guild President was invited to speak and microphones turned off. The artist was equally invited to sing at same time which frustrated the speech and caused confusion. It is only at this point that the security claimed the Guild President's political affiliation would lead her to making political statements. This invitation of both the President and the artist caused misinterpretation to artist's entourage and they inadvertently initiated a confrontation” #92ndGuild #AGraciousMakerere @MakGuild

Speeches at concerts is a bad idea, but if you must remember sometimes the audience is tired and want to see the next performer. If you are the event host and must speak either… 1-You can pre record your message and play it back on the LED screen as an interval AD 2- You can speak way earlier before the concert hype is high. Especially at the event start 3- You can request the headline performer to invite you briefly in between their performance although it has to be pre communicated before he hits stage. Stopping a performer in the middle of a hyped audience for a speech is dangerous and could turn audience violent.Lets plan better next time

I support the organizers coz that was not speech day for God’s sake at lest let people enjoy their time

yeah it’s official Silver HAS to reduce the game count by at least 10, 82 games in the modern NBA especially considering that teams play at a higher pace and more aggression than ever before, not a coincidence that all these starters are consistently getting hurt

Premier League, Champions League and the World Cup were the 3 highest levels of competition last season. The two players with the highest performance level in those competitions were Kvaratskhelia and Messi.

UGANDAN FOOTBALL HEADED FOR BAN IN WAKE OF IGG-FUFA PROBE! The IGG’s directive requiring FUFA to surrender all governance, operational, and financial records from 2016 carries potentially far-reaching implications for Ugandan football. For those unfamiliar with FIFA’s principle of autonomy, it requires member associations to manage their affairs independently and without influence from third parties including government authorities. Consequently, the IGG’s intervention raises questions about the extent to which a government institution can exercise its statutory oversight mandate without infringing upon the autonomy guaranteed to FUFA under FIFA regulations. During previous periods of institutional friction, FIFA warned Uganda that certain forms of government intervention, including externally imposed administrative reforms, could expose the country to international football sanctions. This brings us to a critical distinction which is the fine line between legitimate government oversight and undue interference in football administration. While the IGG has the legal mandate to investigate the management and expenditure of public funds allocated to those at Mengo, extending the scope of the investigation to independently generated commercial revenue, including private sponsorship agreements and television broadcasting rights like the one of StarTimes, could raise concerns under FIFA’s autonomy provisions. However, whether such scrutiny constitutes prohibited interference would ultimately depend on the nature, scope, and consequences of the investigation, rather than the mere exercise of investigative powers. The billion-dollar question, therefore, is how FUFA and FIFA will respond to these developments. Could Uganda potentially face international football sanctions at a time when preparations for the historic PAMOJA AFCON 2027 tournament are entering a crucial phase? Has the government reached a point where it is prepared to risk the potential consequences of its intervention to facilitate a change in FUFA’s leadership and put an end to the Gang in Mengo? More importantly, could these developments signal the beginning of the end for the former Speaker’s husband Moses Magogo? These are questions that deserve serious consideration particularly given the delicate relationship between government oversight, institutional accountability, and the autonomy of football administration. But as I indicated earlier this year, Moses Magogo’s departure from the FUFA presidency is just a question of when, rather than if. Whether the current investigation accelerates that transition remains to be seen. LET THE GAMES CONTINUE 😂😂