Media Director, Developer, Music Artist
Palm Beach, Florida
Joined December 2022
- Tweets8.2K
- Following907
- Followers1.3K
- Likes70.4K
I tried pushing a p2p. Everyone just used more capable centralized tools. Trustless had size limit issues, basically 1 for 1 only, but those have increased quite a bit since then. I kept xTrader going for trustless p2p token swaps but that's it. Now that the tx size limit has increased I'm sure its possible to get a few in the tx... but it will still be different for each collectible standard.
Glad you dig the lane. It's very language geared towards robots/agents but its really much broader. Consider the following: The ATEP envelopes are agnostic to what's inside and on what rails its transported (http, bluetooth, radio, email, laser, etc). And any person/bot/agent/program can be a key holder and can utilize it in any sender/receiver scenario. The Chat Sim is a great demo of its most basic use with messages. Thanks for the feedback! Stay tuned ☕️
What I need: reviewers (cryptography, protocol design, robotics safety, space comms) and one second implementer who doesn't share my assumptions. 533 shared test vectors define the behavior, and the Rust, JavaScript and Python implementations pass every one that applies to them. What I most want looked at: github.com/atepdev/atep/blob…
@PQCAorg @OpenRoboticsOrg @linuxfoundation @AgenticAIFdn
Agents said this thread may be of interest to you☕️
On blockchains: no token, and nothing in the protocol needs a chain. The one place permanence helps is optional: the issuers' transparency log can write its checkpoint hash to a public witness. Solana is the first one I plan to build. It's specified and tested, not live. Whether to add a second, post-quantum-ready witness is an open question, and I'd like to discuss where permanence makes sense. @SolanaFndn
What it is: an identity is the hash of its public keys, so there is no registry to ask. Signatures are hybrid (Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65) and key exchange is hybrid (X25519 + ML-KEM-768), so it stays protected as long as either half holds. Checks run offline against keys and revocation lists you already hold. A live simulator runs the real cryptography in your browser using a robotics profile within the envelope: atep.dev/demo/
Hi everyone!
Quantum-safe, carrier and format agnostic, offline verification for robots, agents, and other things. Open draft protocol, alpha code, not audited.
Throughout my career I've tried to build something like this and failed. This time, with AI agents, I finally got it built. It is neutral and open, for any party that can hold keys. It is not a commercial product, and I'm acting as its steward. Independent audits are the next step, and I'd like to hand stewardship to a reputable foundation as soon as one is willing.
Robots and agents are the first use case. I've also written a design note on relayed space links (optical ISL relay in cislunar orbit is the kind of case I have in mind); it's untested and unreviewed, and I'd love expert eyes on it.
atep.dev
DZ created an express lane under the information highway. Slow drivers are just mad they can't get in the way. Fukm 😁