Spood R. Man | Ω

1) long timescales are a bad assumption. Major QC teams are literally holding back research because they know the implications 2) "Research" into post quantum solutions are fine. But for the last ten years (yes that's how long people have been talking about this) the only thing that anyone has actually done is research. Where is the signet? Where are benchmarks of these algos? Where is this on testnet? Where is the discussion of the obvious implications of a QC making Satoshi's Bitcoin vulnerable (and real plans to address). All this before every single wallet needs to implement and users need to migrate. As @nic_carter has said BIP-360 and @cryptoquick are doing God's work there. We've actually deployed to production an app that uses real PQ to demonstrate how a potential migration would look. Both of these get dismissed because of "not invented here" syndrome. As a result, people are voting with their feet (and money). At some point, hopefully people start taking this seriously. Btw @projecteleven we are contributing. We are working every day to build tools, test, and validate them, in the near term eventuality that this will become relevant for Bitcoin and other crypto networks. My contrarian bet is that will be more useful in the long term than engaging in arguments and trying to convince people who have already made up their minds.