San Francisco
Joined February 2021
- Tweets29.2K
- Following1.6K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes43K
PeterSullivanish retweeted
We see how fast💰pulls politicians away from what they said they stood for…
The #1 reason I support Connie Chan over Scott Wiener, or even Saikat, is she didn't take or spend a bunch of corporate money. She doesn't need to
The election is tallied in Votes, not Dollars—VOTE!
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Facts. This is the kind of commute and transit improvement the city needs. And a Yes on G is a cost effective way to make the westside more transit friendly.
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Because Prop G is a citywide ballot measure, our YES on G volunteers have spent the past couple of months reaching out to voters in other neighborhoods. One door at a time. One conversation at a time. Every vote matters.
We don't have the money for nonstop ads, so we work within our budget, as we always have, volunteering our personal time, showing up in person, and asking voters across San Francisco to vote YES on G.
Many Eastside voters don't know where the Great Highway is. Our outreach reminds them that they, too, have a vote on the future of Westside neighborhoods.
But we have not forgotten our Westside neighbors, especially those in the Sunset, the district I have called home since 2011.
Your struggles are why we keep going.
We are asking for your support. Please vote YES on G. Stand with this grassroots effort and your neighbors who are still struggling to get around after the permanent closure.
With years of construction and additional road closures ahead, we are concerned that traffic congestion and commuting challenges will only grow. sfpuc.gov/irving-street-and-…
San Francisco can have safe streets and great parks. We can support working people and families who need reliable routes to work while preserving space for recreation.
Vote YES on G for the Great Highway Compromise, open to commuters on weekdays and car-free on weekends and holidays. Let's share. 🙏
What's a compromise? greathighwayforeveryone.com/
Follow the money. campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Your campaign is on life support!! Vote Connie! No Wieners in Washington! @Scott_Wiener @Scott_Whiner
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Why so much effort by Lux? Just so he can ride a bike on a road? Or is there something else?
How much $ does Lucas Lux stand to lose if Yes on G prevails? Are his monied backers panicking as well?
With just 5 days left before the November election, the Great Highway Compromise faces another legal challenge from Lucas Lux. As a Google lawyer, he knows very well how expensive these lawsuits are.
Lucas Lux's nonprofit, Friends of Sunset Dunes, has submitted a notice of appeal today challenging the court ruling that allowed Great Highway Compromise, Prop G, onto the ballot.
San Francisco voters deserve to decide with a vote, but Lucas Lux doesn't like that ordinary people have a say this November.
Lucas Lux is still trying to keep the Great Highway Compromise off the November ballot.
Why now? Likely because Lucas Lux has more than $500,000 left to burn in the next 5 days.
YES on G volunteers are still knocking on doors citywide, speaking with neighbors, and putting up signs. Every legal battle adds another burden to an effort sustained by ordinary people giving what they can.
I'm voting YES on G to allow the public with weekday access for everyone while preserving car-free recreation on weekends and holidays. That's a fair share.
Working families and commuters deserve reliable transportation, and San Francisco deserves a Great Highway we can share. 2-mile asphalt is not the entire 50-acre park. Share and Compromise.
Vote YES on G.
What's a compromise? greathighwayforeveryone.com/
Need a window sign? docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Follow the money. campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Imagine selling out your own people for a few votes.
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Saturday (10/31) 4pm
Only 8 people
Yet, Rec&Park claims 500+ people enjoy asphalt of GH every hr. The #’s are obviously fraudulent
We need a Yes on G compromise to address this fraud
@SelenaC10705 @EricaJSandberg @LarryQ6
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Politicians are for sale. And we bought Scott. Now vote for him so we can get our ROI.
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Wow. So when you include transit riders, the estimated value of the time lost from spillover traffic increases to $4.1M per year.
Let’s support public transit by voting Yes on G. It’s not fair to punish tens of thousands of working people for the luxury comforts of a few hundred rich white neoliberals.
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Only 6 people at the Saturday sunset. Confirming the Rec&Park’s report of 500 people/hr is blatantly fraudulent!
Vote Yes on the G compromise and these 6 people will still get to use the whole asphalt on Saturdays
@SelenaC10705 @LarryQ6
Saturday (10/31) 4pm
Only 8 people
Yet, Rec&Park claims 500+ people enjoy asphalt of GH every hr. The #’s are obviously fraudulent
We need a Yes on G compromise to address this fraud
@SelenaC10705 @EricaJSandberg @LarryQ6
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Commuters on the westside of SF lose an estimated $3.4M worth of time each year in spillover traffic. And this is a conservative estimate.
Yes on G fixes this by opening Great Highway on the weekdays, while keeping Sunset Dunes closed to traffic on the weekends.
PeterSullivanish retweeted
Remember these crashes on Sunset Blvd?
Just one of many crashes on our usually safe Sunset streets. Yet when neighbors raise concerns, we're told the data doesn't show what we're seeing and experiencing firsthand.
Don't tell me to "deal with it" when you can't understand that a city has cars and everyone needs to share the road. Don't tell me to "deal with it" when people are getting hurt because you refused to share.
The Compromise is a fair share.
Vote YES on G. Share and Compromise. San Francisco can have safe streets and great parks. It's not all or nothing.
