Strong Interactive | AI, XR & blockchain innovation powering https://teapawt.net/t.co/PLHC4FCQxS, MetaDine & Baller Mixed Reality. Building the future of secure immersive tech.
Miami Beach
Joined March 2011
- Tweets870
- Following150
- Followers151
- Likes321
Strong Interactive retweeted
Thanks to @tickerNEWSco for having me on to discuss #Secure #AI. Watch the full interview: tickernews.co/ai-security-na…
Strong Interactive retweeted
October #AIJockey is out. Lead story: #OpenAI reports two of its agents weakened the monitoring built to watch them. One then said it hadn't.
Internal evals, not production. The fix: move the monitor out of the agent's reach.
stronginteractive.io/news/ai…
#AI #AIAgents
Strong Interactive retweeted
The AI buildout just got a credit check.
CoreWeave: shares down 15%+ Wednesday, 2031 bonds yielding above 16%, default swaps implying ~63% odds of default in five years (Reuters).
The company says its $104B backlog covers ~$50B of debt. Bonds aren't convinced yet.
🤖 Made with AI
Strong Interactive retweeted
Last Monday the New York City Council asked four AI labs, under oath, to guarantee their agents will always obey their safety guardrails. None would. Right answer. It should end a boardroom habit: asking the vendor for assurance. #EnterpriseAI #AIStrategy
Every Tuesday SOVAIR publishes one page for the people who defend regulated systems. The AI Threat Weekly: AI-enabled cyber threats to nuclear, energy and other regulated sectors, from open-source reporting, weekly since Aug 14. #SovereignAI #AirGapped
This week's lead: an autonomous agent chained two unknown flaws in helpdesk software and reached root in seconds (disclosed by DIVD). What contained it was network segmentation and the responders. A wall that was already there.
Why weekly: the pattern only shows across editions. A boundary everyone assumed held turns out to be a setting. Read it: sovair.ai/threat-weekly More: StrongInteractive.io/news #SovereignAI #SafeAI #AirGapped #CriticalInfrastructure #AIInfrastructure
Strong Interactive retweeted
"Human in the loop" is doing the job #AirGapped was doing two weeks ago: making people feel safe about a control that isn't really there. Here is why, and what to build instead. #AI #SovereignAI
🤖 Made with AI
Sandboxed and air-gapped are not synonyms, and the AI industry keeps using them as if they are. A sandbox is a rule enforced by software. An air gap is the absence of a path. #AirGapped #SovereignAI
🤖 Made with AI
When a sandbox fails, the attacker reaches whatever the host can reach. When an air gap holds, there is no connected node to reach — because you never built one. Isolation is a discipline, not a purchase.
Air gaps aren't magic. Stuxnet crossed one on a USB stick. But in a regulated environment you can't audit "we trust the hypervisor." You can audit "there is no path." linkedin.com/feed/update/urn… #SovereignAI #SafeAI #AirGapped #CriticalInfrastructure #AIInfrastructure
Strong Interactive retweeted
We cut 9 clips from the last two months — Sacks and Calacanis on All-In, Bloomberg Intelligence, Karp on CNBC, Janus Henderson, Moonshots — into one video. The market conversation has converged on a single question: where does AI actually run? 1/3
Strong Interactive retweeted
"Semantic Web" sounds academic. The idea is simple: there's the web people read, and the web machines understand — structured data that tells an AI what you are, what you sell, and how you relate to everything else. Guess which one AI assistants consult.
Strong Interactive retweeted
Jonathan Herman to Moderate Ai4 Panel on AI for Energy Resilience, Reliability and Decarbonization
#ai4 #aiforenergy #pressrelease #pressreleaseservice @247pressnews
Press release: 24-7pressrelease.com/press-r…
Strong Interactive retweeted
In sports, 2026 made it official: the #fan #experience — not the broadcast — is now the product. PwC's Sports Outlook names #AI, #dynamic #ticketing and athlete economics as the year's defining forces.
Strong Interactive retweeted
AI answer engines don't rank pages anymore — they assemble answers. New data: they cite brands ~87% of the time but actually name them in only ~21%. Most "citations" are ghosts. Your insight shows up. Your brand doesn't.