Susan bevis retweeted
#PansPandasAwarenessDay
#WorldMentalHealthDay
Neuropsychiatric symptoms triggered by a Virus and/or infection 😢💚
Opinion: Our daughter died at 26. Memorial Bridge will be lighted green for PANDAS/PANS research. seacoastonline.com/story/opi…
Susan bevis retweeted
Pans Pandas can cause restricted eating - Awareness is key.
Early diagnosis is vital - it is treatable 💚
Susan bevis retweeted
P’s objections to early evening curfew are “compelling” evidence of deprivation of liberty after AGNI
By @KitzingerCelia
openjusticecourtofprotection…
Susan bevis retweeted
Replying to @MaikeNepomuk @helenhelix
Thank you. In my case, I repeatedly raised concerns about my disabled daughter’s care, treatment and restrictions on her liberty. I contacted police, safeguarding bodies, regulators and spent years in the Court of Protection.
What is particularly painful is that the restrictions on our family have become extraordinarily severe. We have been told not to speak our native language during contact. Conversations have been supervised, with staff listening to every word. These restrictions have continued for years.
After around eight years of litigation, I have still not seen evidence that justifies treating an ordinary mother-daughter relationship in this way.
That is what people outside the system often do not understand. Deprivation of liberty is not only about whether somebody is physically allowed to walk out of a building. It can reach into communication, relationships, privacy, language and family life.
And when you challenge it, you discover that one body refers you to another: police, safeguarding, regulators, Ombudsmen, courts, while the vulnerable person continues living under the restrictions.
Because there are current proceedings and reporting restrictions, I have to be careful about what I disclose. But after eight years, I believe the public needs to understand the human reality behind the words “care”, “safeguarding” and “best interests”.
Susan bevis retweeted
Exc: I sat down with Baroness Casey, the woman tasked with fixing social care in England, to talk about the state of the care system with some hints (I think) at what she could recommend to @andyburnham.
Some of it could sound like music to the PM’s ears itv.com/news/2026-09-17/case…
'Staff slept' while man was strangled to death in NHS unit by patient dailymail.com/news/article-1…
Susan bevis retweeted
What if some of the behaviors we label as psychiatric symptoms are actually the effects of the drugs prescribed to treat them?
This article looks at decades of patient experiences and clinical cases involving antidepressants and other psychiatric medications—experiences including suicidality, aggression, intrusive thoughts, delirium, personality changes, altered states of consciousness, and behaviors people describe as feeling completely out of their control.
The lived experiences of people taking these medications deserve to be heard, investigated, and taken seriously—not dismissed as merely anecdotal. As this article makes clear, listening to patients may reveal things that conventional medical data has overlooked.
#MentalHealth #psychiatry
buff.ly/muKdxw6
Susan bevis retweeted
Ever notice how medicine is at the core of nearly all modern atrocities?
Abortion. Transgenderism. Psychiatry. COVID.
The broken relationships, self destruction, child sacrifice, and narcissism of abortion. The pedophilia, delusion, and child mutilation of gender "medicine." The school shootings, suicides, self victimization, addiction, and learned helplessness of psychiatry. The chronic disease, vaccine injuries, human rights violations, and global circus of COVID.
What a complete cesspool.
Lindsay Clancy killed her three children and tried to kill herself. The jurors are deliberating. Read psychiatrist David Healy’s excellent account about psych drugs causing command hallucinations. bit.ly/4qW73Lk. She should be acquitted. See also bit.ly/4wriXxL
Susan bevis retweeted
I’m a Doctor and my personal health goal is to avoid all doctors and medications.
I never want to be on any prescription drug. My nightmare is to have to take a daily medication and be reliant on the pharmaceutical industry
Susan bevis retweeted
There's more to the Lindsay Clancy case, because psychiatry is on trial.
Psychiatry and Big Pharma have been force-feeding psychiatric drugs to almost 10M humans each year through psychiatry's facilities.
These drugs have been known for 3+ DECADES to cause violence and suicides.
These drugs alter >99% of the ~500 trillion connections in the human brain.
THIS IS WORSE THAN THE HOLOCAUST AND STILL ON-GOING.
Almost 10M humans locked up and forced psych drugs each year:
unitedgmh.org/newsroom/new-r…
Psych drugs have been known to cause violence and suicides for 3+ DECADES:
xitter.cf/FrankLeeSG/status/2095…
Psychiatry is the most evil hoax in the history of mankind:
franklee1111.com/2026/01/15/…
Susan bevis retweeted
Slapping a “mental health diagnosis” on every other person and putting them on lifelong drugs, is one of the biggest crimes against humanity the world has ever seen
I hope that future generations look back with horror at what the medical profession and the world of psychiatry are doing
The link between “mental health” medications and violent acts is becoming more and more apparent. It’s amazing to me that so many people are talking about the Lindsey Clancy case and no one is talking about the 30+ prescriptions in the 4 months prior to the murders.
Why aren’t the doctors being investigated as well? Or how about pharma? I’m not excusing her by any means but we have a real crisis with these unsafe and ineffective drugs.
So do medications cause ppl to murder? Or no?
As of 2021, 57.8 million adults in the U.S. experienced some form of mental illness, while 14.1 million adults suffered from a serious mental illness.
In 2018, more than 34 million Americans were reported to be taking antidepressants.
By 2023, over 3 million American children were receiving medication for behavioral issues.
Over half of all mass shootings have occurred since the year 2000, with 20% taking place since 2014.
Studies from Finland and Sweden suggest a possible link between prescription drug use and violent behavior.
Between 2000 and 2013, 22% of mass shooters were reported to have used either prescription or illicit drugs.
Official mental health diagnoses were found in 40% of individuals responsible for school attacks between 2008 and 2018.
Prozac and Effexor were among the most commonly identified antidepressants in cases involving school shooters from 2000 to 2018.
If this case gets retried I strongly suggest her attorney hire Dr. David Healy, Dr. Peter Breggin, Dr. Peter Gøtzsche and Dr. Yolande Lucire and focus soley on psychiatric drug-induced psychosis and ADRs instead of making the case about post partum depression.
Susan bevis retweeted
Everyone knows the Lindsay Clancy case. Almost nobody knows this one, and the reason why should stop you cold: when a mother dies alongside her children, there is no trial, no media coverage, and no one digs into what happened in the months before.
Tranyelle Harshman was a 32-year-old Wyoming mother of four. No history of violence. No suicidal history. Her husband describes a loving mother and an incredible wife, and he is standing by her, just like Lindsay Clancy's husband. There was no affair, no conflict, no motive. I searched.
What there was, according to the Wall Street Journal's reporting and the wrongful death lawsuit her mother has filed, was take-home ketamine prescribed for postpartum depression. When Tranyelle reported heart palpitations and feeling disconnected from reality for days, she was reportedly told it often gets worse before it gets better, and her dose was increased. After taking that increased dose, she shot her four daughters and then herself. Toxicology reportedly showed ketamine at four times the threshold associated with mind-altering effects.
I helped develop a ketamine-based drug during my time in pharma. I know these side effect tables: dissociation in nearly half of patients, hallucinations, agitation, fear. This is why ketamine is normally given under clinical supervision, not at home, alone, with children napping upstairs.
The pattern from the Clancy case is identical. A struggling mother reports that a drug is making her worse, and the answer is a higher dose. I will keep saying this until it changes: when a patient gets worse on a psychiatric drug, that is information, not impatience. You do not double down on it.
Susan bevis retweeted
This post could almost have been written about my own experience.
Nine years ago, my daughter voluntarily moved into brand-new supported accommodation in our city. The brochure promised independence, community life and help with ordinary day-to-day things. The facilities were wonderful.
The problems began almost immediately.
When I visited the next day, I found my daughter’s embroidered bedding, cushions and duvet thrown across the dirty, wet floor of her wet room, because staff said she had been sweating during the night. Apart from everything else, it created a serious trip hazard for my disabled daughter trying to reach the toilet.
I raised it with the manager. Instead of concern, I was effectively told that her staff were experienced, had done nothing wrong, and that I was “annoying”.
I contacted Social Services. A social worker came, we discussed matters, and I genuinely believed things would improve.
They didn’t.
That incident became the beginning of years of complaints about increasingly concerning care and behaviour. But instead of properly investigating what I was raising, the local authority brought Court of Protection proceedings.
What I discovered afterwards was even more disturbing: during an important period of my daughter’s care, the accommodation appeared to have been providing intimate personal care and administering powerful medication without the CQC registration that should have been in place. That period was also when some of the most serious harm occurred.
I complained. I produced evidence. The court was informed. Regulators were informed.
Nine years later, I am still fighting.
Yesterday I received an Ombudsman's decision saying they could see no indication that anything had gone seriously wrong and would take no further action. I now have one month to challenge that decision, and I will. Not because I have great confidence in the complaints system anymore, but because my complaint was submitted through my MP, Jonathan Brash @JonathanBrash , and I want the evidence of what has been overlooked to be absolutely clear.
Meanwhile, my daughter herself has brought a section 21A challenge to her deprivation of liberty. Despite her wanting my help, I had to fight through two court hearings simply to become a party to the proceedings because her advocate considered my involvement "undesirable".
That is what people need to understand about complaining.
Sometimes you start by saying, “Something is wrong with my loved one’s care.” Years later, you find yourself buried under complaints procedures, regulators, lawyers and court hearings, while the original question remains unanswered:
What happened to the vulnerable person, and why did nobody stop it?
Families should never become the target simply because they refused to look away.
xitter.cf/ZoeJames2024/status/20…
Let's talk about the #NHS and what happens when you dare to complain.
Because this is something people need to understand.
I didn't complain because I was bored.
I didn't complain because I had nothing better to do.
I didn't complain because I wanted a fight.
I complained because my daughter was being harmed.
I saw things happening that I believed were wrong.
I raised concerns.
I questioned decisions.
I challenged a professional.
Because that's what you are SUPPOSED to do when you believe a vulnerable person isn't being properly protected.
Except apparently there is a massive difference between telling people to " speak up " and actually having the audacity to SPEAK UP.
Because once I did?
Everything changed.
Instead of simply dealing with the concerns I had raised, I became the concern.
Think about that.
A mother raises concerns about what is happening to her vulnerable daughter...
and suddenly the spotlight turns onto the mother.
My behaviour.
My credibility.
My motives.
My questions.
My complaints.
My refusal to shut up.
Apparently that was easier to investigate than the original problem.
And THIS is what makes me so angry.
Because when you're dealing with a huge organisation like the NHS, they have the power.
They have the professionals.
They have the records.
They have the lawyers.
They have the complaints departments.
They have the language.
They have the institutional power.
And what does a parent have?
Their voice.
So when that parent uses the only weapon they have, their voice, why does the system seem so determined to take that away from them?
I was not asking for special treatment.
I was asking for my concerns to be properly investigated.
I was asking people to listen.
And instead I found myself fighting a system that seemed far more interested in dealing with ME than dealing with what I was raising.
That is the part I will never forget.
Because once you've experienced it, you see the complaints system very differently.
You realise that " please complain if you're unhappy " sounds wonderful until you actually make a complaint that someone doesn't want to hear.
Then suddenly you're difficult.
You're challenging.
You're unreasonable.
You're the problem.
No.
I was a mother trying to protect her daughter.
And I make absolutely no apology for that.
If my refusal to stay quiet makes me " difficult, " then so be it.
If asking questions makes me " difficult, " then so be it.
If refusing to accept answers I believe are inadequate makes me " difficult, " then I'll happily wear the fooking label.
Because my daughter's welfare matters more to me than making professionals comfortable.
And here's my message to the NHS:
Don't tell families to speak up if you're going to punish them for doing it.
Don't tell us complaints are welcomed if what you really mean is,
" We welcome complaints that don't make us uncomfortable. "
Don't tell us patient safety comes first if the person raising a patient safety concern ends up being treated like the problem.
And don't expect me to quietly disappear because the system has made it exhausting to keep fighting.
I'm still here.
I'm still asking questions.
I'm still documenting what happened.
I'm still challenging what I believe was wrong.
And I'm still speaking.
Because my daughter deserved better.
And frankly?
So does every vulnerable person whose family has the courage to say:
" Something isn't right here. "
Maybe the NHS should stop asking,
" Why won't this parent shut up? "
And start asking:
" Why did we give her something to complain about in the first place? "
Susan bevis retweeted
Let's talk about the #NHS and what happens when you dare to complain.
Because this is something people need to understand.
I didn't complain because I was bored.
I didn't complain because I had nothing better to do.
I didn't complain because I wanted a fight.
I complained because my daughter was being harmed.
I saw things happening that I believed were wrong.
I raised concerns.
I questioned decisions.
I challenged a professional.
Because that's what you are SUPPOSED to do when you believe a vulnerable person isn't being properly protected.
Except apparently there is a massive difference between telling people to " speak up " and actually having the audacity to SPEAK UP.
Because once I did?
Everything changed.
Instead of simply dealing with the concerns I had raised, I became the concern.
Think about that.
A mother raises concerns about what is happening to her vulnerable daughter...
and suddenly the spotlight turns onto the mother.
My behaviour.
My credibility.
My motives.
My questions.
My complaints.
My refusal to shut up.
Apparently that was easier to investigate than the original problem.
And THIS is what makes me so angry.
Because when you're dealing with a huge organisation like the NHS, they have the power.
They have the professionals.
They have the records.
They have the lawyers.
They have the complaints departments.
They have the language.
They have the institutional power.
And what does a parent have?
Their voice.
So when that parent uses the only weapon they have, their voice, why does the system seem so determined to take that away from them?
I was not asking for special treatment.
I was asking for my concerns to be properly investigated.
I was asking people to listen.
And instead I found myself fighting a system that seemed far more interested in dealing with ME than dealing with what I was raising.
That is the part I will never forget.
Because once you've experienced it, you see the complaints system very differently.
You realise that " please complain if you're unhappy " sounds wonderful until you actually make a complaint that someone doesn't want to hear.
Then suddenly you're difficult.
You're challenging.
You're unreasonable.
You're the problem.
No.
I was a mother trying to protect her daughter.
And I make absolutely no apology for that.
If my refusal to stay quiet makes me " difficult, " then so be it.
If asking questions makes me " difficult, " then so be it.
If refusing to accept answers I believe are inadequate makes me " difficult, " then I'll happily wear the fooking label.
Because my daughter's welfare matters more to me than making professionals comfortable.
And here's my message to the NHS:
Don't tell families to speak up if you're going to punish them for doing it.
Don't tell us complaints are welcomed if what you really mean is,
" We welcome complaints that don't make us uncomfortable. "
Don't tell us patient safety comes first if the person raising a patient safety concern ends up being treated like the problem.
And don't expect me to quietly disappear because the system has made it exhausting to keep fighting.
I'm still here.
I'm still asking questions.
I'm still documenting what happened.
I'm still challenging what I believe was wrong.
And I'm still speaking.
Because my daughter deserved better.
And frankly?
So does every vulnerable person whose family has the courage to say:
" Something isn't right here. "
Maybe the NHS should stop asking,
" Why won't this parent shut up? "
And start asking:
" Why did we give her something to complain about in the first place? "























