The machines are coming Professional Atomic Dove player Vaguely average I'm one of the top nations in the country I am the sky computer
Joined February 2012
- Tweets2.7K
- Following1.7K
- Followers1K
- Likes13.6K
swango.eth retweeted
Debunking the "Fake Chassis" myth on the Tesla Roadster @SpaceX Package.
Anti-fans claim the Isogrid floor is "fake/empty" simply because they lack basic aerospace engineering knowledge:
Isogrid Exoskeleton: Same principles as Super Heavy’s Hot-Staging Ring. Maximum strength-to-weight ratio to absorb massive RCS thrust & landing impact loads.
Carbon Composite Shield: Look at unedited photos — there's a sealed carbon-fiber floor behind the grid protecting the 10,000 PSI COPV tanks.
Steer-by-Wire + C++ Automation: Autonomous flight precision.
It’s First Principles engineering, not a show-car gimmick. 🚀 @elonmusk @SawyerMerritt @Tesla
swango.eth retweeted
You know he knocked it out of the park if liberals are still outraged 3 days later.
He was hilarious (and correct).
swango.eth retweeted
🚨🚨🚨
With the assistance of @FSUofAustralia, I have officially lodged an appeal against the Australian eSafety Commissioner's censorship of an investigative article I published on Substack and shared on X.
swango.eth retweeted
You can’t make this stuff up .
E -Safety commissioner takes a journalist to court to stop them telling the public that the Australian Medical Association hired a trans pornstar to promote gender affirming care to pre teens to Australian doctors .
That’s the protection the e Safety commissioner is providing to our children .
I don’t normally worry about this category of stuff but it’s become next level loony .
🚨🚨🚨
With the assistance of @FSUofAustralia, I have officially lodged an appeal against the Australian eSafety Commissioner's censorship of an investigative article I published on Substack and shared on X.
swango.eth retweeted
Jim Chalmers cannot stop spending, and now he has his eyes on Australians’ superannuation to fund more of Labor’s bad ideas.
When the Prime Minister calls your super a “national asset” that can be “used more appropriately”, alarm bells should ring.
Your super is not Labor’s piggy bank. It is your money, earned through your work and put aside for your retirement.
One Nation believes Australians should have more control over their own super, including being able to access it when they genuinely need it.
Jim Chalmers should keep his hands off your super.
swango.eth retweeted
Jim Chalmers cannot stop spending, and now he has his eyes on Australians’ superannuation to fund more of Labor’s bad ideas.
When the Prime Minister calls your super a “national asset” that can be “used more appropriately”, alarm bells should ring.
Your super is not Labor’s piggy bank. It is your money, earned through your work and put aside for your retirement.
One Nation believes Australians should have more control over their own super, including being able to access it when they genuinely need it.
Jim Chalmers should keep his hands off your super.
swango.eth retweeted
More public institutions and major organizations are formally supporting this version of the CLARITY ACT
- without passage, other nations may take the lead in the digital financial future
@BitMNR @FundstratDirect @FundstratCap
$BMNR $BMNP
swango.eth retweeted
The Clarity Act is good for the country, good for consumers, and good for the people we represent on both sides of the aisle.
After nearly 11 months of giving almost everything asked of us, I genuinely don't know what else my Democrat colleagues need before we act.
swango.eth retweeted
Stand with Crypto Advocates across the country are making their voices heard on the CLARITY Act.
Here's what that looks like, state by state. 🧵👇
swango.eth retweeted
1 in 4 U.S. adults own crypto, and the majority are under 45. A new generation wants a new financial system — and they're counting on CLARITY.
More than a million phone calls and emails have gone to Senators in support of CLARITY! Thanks to @standwithcrypto for giving the public a voice.💪
AZ: more than 24,600 Senate contacts
CO: more than 20,500 Senate contacts
KS: more than 6,500 Senate contacts
KY: more than 9,300 Senate contacts
MO: more than 14,400 Senate contacts
NV: more than 16,200 Senate contacts
NJ: more than 33,900 Senate contacts
NM: more than 4,800 Senate contacts
OK: more than 10,400 Senate contacts
TX: more than 93,000 Senate contacts
UT: more than 11,600 Senate contacts
FL: more than 99,000 Senate contacts
PA: more than 32,000 Senate contacts
OH: more than 27,000 Senate contacts
swango.eth retweeted
The CLARITY Act is critically needed to ensure the US 🇺🇸 leads this digital financial future.
This needs to be passed and enacted
Please 🙏 call your Senator and push for this vote
More than a year ago, the House passed the Clarity Act.
There’s been progress since — thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations took place at the staff and Member levels. The Senate Committees on Banking and Agriculture advanced their respective titles. And Senate Republicans produced a floor-ready product that, as I type this, is waiting for a vote.
It’s disappointing — but not surprising — that Senate Democrats are choosing politics on the cusp of a major victory for American leadership. Find another instance in history where Congress, when given the choice, opted to push an industry out of the United States rather than smartly regulate it. American Exceptionalism was once a bipartisan goal; if Clarity fails, I have serious doubts.
These same Democrats — many of whom have taken millions of dollars from the crypto industry — proclaim that Clarity lacks safeguards for consumers and falls short in countering illicit finance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Titles II and III materially uplift regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act — which Washington lobbyists have spun up as a boogeyman for certain groups of prosecutors and law enforcement — does nothing other than codify longstanding Treasury Department policy that’s remained consistent across Administrations: non-custodial builders and developers are not, and have never been, subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. And at this point, major law enforcement trades that once opposed the bill, including the Fraternal Order of Police, have now endorsed it.
The Senate needs to vote NOW on this landmark legislation. The truth is that Senate Democrats are afraid to advance the Clarity Act as they fear Senator Warren and the “Anti-Crypto Army” she once promised to build. In the days ahead, Leader Thune will put this theory to the test. Will Senate Democrats be on the side of American Exceptionalism, or will they opt to cede American leadership of a global industry for fear of the bespectacled squirrel’s Left flank?
America will lead or America won’t. It’s not more complicated than that. I believe Satoshi once said it best:
“If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry.”
swango.eth retweeted
More than a year ago, the House passed the Clarity Act.
There’s been progress since — thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations took place at the staff and Member levels. The Senate Committees on Banking and Agriculture advanced their respective titles. And Senate Republicans produced a floor-ready product that, as I type this, is waiting for a vote.
It’s disappointing — but not surprising — that Senate Democrats are choosing politics on the cusp of a major victory for American leadership. Find another instance in history where Congress, when given the choice, opted to push an industry out of the United States rather than smartly regulate it. American Exceptionalism was once a bipartisan goal; if Clarity fails, I have serious doubts.
These same Democrats — many of whom have taken millions of dollars from the crypto industry — proclaim that Clarity lacks safeguards for consumers and falls short in countering illicit finance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Titles II and III materially uplift regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act — which Washington lobbyists have spun up as a boogeyman for certain groups of prosecutors and law enforcement — does nothing other than codify longstanding Treasury Department policy that’s remained consistent across Administrations: non-custodial builders and developers are not, and have never been, subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. And at this point, major law enforcement trades that once opposed the bill, including the Fraternal Order of Police, have now endorsed it.
The Senate needs to vote NOW on this landmark legislation. The truth is that Senate Democrats are afraid to advance the Clarity Act as they fear Senator Warren and the “Anti-Crypto Army” she once promised to build. In the days ahead, Leader Thune will put this theory to the test. Will Senate Democrats be on the side of American Exceptionalism, or will they opt to cede American leadership of a global industry for fear of the bespectacled squirrel’s Left flank?
America will lead or America won’t. It’s not more complicated than that. I believe Satoshi once said it best:
“If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry.”
swango.eth retweeted
🟠 EVERY PARTY IN TASMANIA WENT BACKWARDS, EXCEPT THE ONE THAT JUST SHOWED UP 🟠
Tasmania was supposed to be the one state where One Nation couldn't get a foothold. Small, its own electoral system, a big independent streak, a long way from the mainland surge.
So much for that. In DemosAU's new state poll, One Nation debuts straight into second, and it isn't a slow build off a small base. A year ago the party wasn't even listed in Tasmanian polling. It has never held a seat in the state's parliament. It went from not on the board to second in a single reading.
Here is the part that should scare the majors. Every other party on the card went backwards. The Liberals, Labor, the Greens, the independents, the minor parties, all down. The only line moving up is the one that didn't exist last time anyone looked.
There is now no state left on the map where the orange wave hasn't landed. That was the last argument the majors had, and Tasmania just took it away.
Full state by state breakdown on our live tracker:
onenewsaustralia.com/austral…
swango.eth retweeted
Socialists imagine a class struggle. In their made-up fantasy the CEO is in competition with low level workers, the wealthy entrepreneur is stealing from the underpaid nurse.
In reality, workers do not compete vertically they compete horizontally.
Entrepreneurs compete with entrepreneurs. Investors outbid each other. CEOs are benchmarked against other CEOs. Nurses are hired from a pool of nurses. Etc.
The CEOs pay has no correlation to the entry level workers. The Football star on £300K a week isn’t linked to the person selling drinks in the stadium. A biotech entrepreneur raising VC capital isn’t paid relative to a cleaner.
What is linked is the demand and supply dynamic of each role.
If a company places an ad for a qualified truck driver and 150 people apply for the role, then the company knows it does not need to increase wages for that role. If the company has an open role for months, it is forced to look at the compensation package.
Same for a CEO. A board representing shareholders would like to hire a CEO for a lot less if they could. Their dream scenario would be to hire a CEO who brings in institutional investors, attracts top executives, drives innovation and growth, keeps margins steady and is a good public face for the business even under pressure. It turns out there aren’t a lot of these people looking for work and if you want one you have to pay more than other companies are offering.
The class struggle isn’t vertical it’s horizontal. CEOs are in competition with CEOs. Retail workers are in competition with retail workers. Demand and supply dynamics set the price.
Sure you can say that a CEO want’s profitability and would like wages to be lower BUT it’s not up to the CEO - demand and supply tension sets the price of workers. An Airline like RyanAir would like free pilots if they could get them but they can’t… so they pay the market rate.
The reason incomes are rising at the top and falling at the bottom is not class warfare. It’s technology and globalisation.
Technology makes basic jobs simple, remote or fully automated. At the same time tech makes executive roles more leveraged, more important and more valuable.
A CEO used to run a smaller organisation. Today a CEO who’s 2% better on a $5B company is generating $100M more. Seems sensible to try and pay a few million to get $100M.
Globalisation has put workers from all over the world in completion with each other - downward pressure on wages. Globalisation has given CEOs more market opportunities to explore - upside opportunity to unlock.
The rich are not very interested in buying houses that poor people own. The poor are not buying up the homes the rich want. They are separate groups living separate lives. Try finding the genuinely rich people whose strategy is to hoard normal residential homes - it barely exists as a thing. About 85% of landlords are people who own 1-4 properties. Super-landlords (100+ properties) are 0.2% of landlords and own a tiny fraction of the 30M homes in the UK… and they’re heavily taxed.
Class warfare isn’t real. It’s an imagined war in the minds of socialists.
Demand and supply dynamics are real. To the degree it is measured in class, it’s a horizontal competition not a vertical one.
swango.eth retweeted
This video on the introduction of a wealth tax shows just how painful it is arguing with the Left.
Facts don’t matter. Ideology comes first.
swango.eth retweeted
Socialists want to redistribute wealth, while removing the system that creates that wealth, and installing a system that creates less wealth.
It doesn’t work in practice or principle.
This is because the anti-capitalist left is not actually against people being crazy rich. They're against certain types of people being crazy rich.
Artists and athletes make sense to them because they've played music and sports and because their success can be explained by "luck" and "talent". Messi's wealth is not offensive to them because they understand Messi is much better at football than they are.
But when it comes to business, the anti-capitalist leftist has no framework for understanding why Jeff Bezos might be super rich since 99% of them have never ever created a product, business or service that was of value to other people. They've never taken entrepreneurial risk. They've never employed people and felt the burden of responsibility that comes with that. They've never pick up a business and given it a play in the way they've picked up a ball or a guitar.
They *literally* don't understand wealth creation. They think there is a fixed amount of money and the only thing a business does is split it unfairly.
It's why they rage at Elon and other successful business leaders. Because they genuinely don't understand why they're wealthy.
Also, and this is just as important, athletes and artists are disproportionately young, attractive, "diverse", left wing etc. Business leaders are "evil" middle aged white men whose success offends the average anti-capitalist leftist because they don't understand a) what it is they do and b) that Elon Musk has the same talent advantage on them as Messi does, it's just harder to measure.
swango.eth retweeted
These retards banned social media for Australians in 2025. It clearly isn’t working.
Within the last week they have said that algorithms are causing “anal tearing” and that it should be illegal for politicians to be ratioed online.
Fuck these losers @tweetinjules @AlboMP
