You did well. You hit them where it hurts, and now they're out here crying. ππππ
@MbuyiseniNdlozi
Dr Thathe retweeted
This is a correct characterisation.
The DA is intending to collaborate with FF+ today to govern our metros, because a βblack intellectualβ took platform and promoted voter apathy amongst the black audience he enjoys.
It is counter-revolution.
Today, the fighters are busy writing paragraphs. π€£π€£π€£
South Africa needs honest and sincere leaders, who donβt lie to the people for votes.
Voting patterns shifted significantly in our metros and cities. If we were to run a survey in middle class households in those same cities, how many would we find trusting foreign nationals with their homes, and even their children, as nannies, gardeners, and domestic worker?
You leave a foreigner with your child, they feed them, bathe them, and put them to sleep. They have access to your fridge, and the food your family eats. You eat without fearing that you have been poisoned. You leave for work trusting that your child and your home will be safe.
This is why we must question the claim by some political parties that these voting patterns reflect an inherent hatred of foreigners.
To the contrary, our people have real concerns. They cannot find work, they cannot afford rent, they fear raising children in crime ridden communities, they cannot afford education, and cannot afford the rising cost of living.
South Africans want functioning hospitals, good schools and a government that responds to their needs.
Those frustrations cannot all be explained away by the presence of foreigners. Nor will they disappear when foreigners are chased away.
When someone says they cannot find work, the answer must be jobs. When a community has no water, the answer must be reliable water supply. When families feel unsafe, the answer must be protection, and effective policing.
Political parties may win votes by directing anger towards foreigners. But winning a vote does not prove that they have correctly identified the cause of the peopleβs suffering.
South Africans do not need slogans driven by hate and political opportunism. They need real solutions.
You say everyone has the right to respond, but you only want to speak without being challenged. That's not confidence; that's an inability to handle accountability. If you're going to speak your truth publicly, don't expect everyone to applaud. You don't get to control who responds just because you don't like what they have to say. π€£
But there was nothing wrong with the question. The problem is that EFF members hate hearing the truth. Your leader is associated with some of the biggest criminals in our country. When a journalist questioned him about it, he chose to attack the journalist instead of addressing the issue. Fortunately, South Africans are not buying it. But I guess you have to twist the truth to earn your bread.
Dear Redi, while we clearly disagree on the boundaries of media engagement & political platforms, there is no need for you to say I must remove my head from the back side. I respect the role of the media in holding leadership accountable. However, politicians also reserve the right to advocate for the focus of their own events. We can debate the ethics of journalism without resorting to personal attacks. Letβs keep the engagement professional. If a question was foolish and stupid....it is exactly that.....for you to say I must remove my head from the backside, I know exactly what you mean. I will defend you when you are called the B*tch word just like you do not have to make innuendo about my head on on the backside. You are stooping very low.
Being a good police officer doesn't mean you personally control every electoral process in KwaZulu-Natal. Don't blame Mkhwanazi for every alleged irregularity just because his name is convenient for your argument.
I don't understand why comrades are getting upset about her comment. She didn't even mention any political party.
@karynmaughan







