
AI | Healthtech | Fintech | Longevity @quome.com | ex Informed Amount FIS l All opinions may have been mine at one time but now will be denied.
Mattapoisett, MA
Joined January 2008
- Tweets6.7K
- Following2.2K
- Followers458
- Likes7K
Terry Lee retweeted
Just because Donald Trump acts goofy doesn’t mean his presidency wouldn’t be dangerous. And you don’t have to take my word for it. Lately, some of the people who know Trump the best have been saying in no uncertain terms that he should not be president again.
Terry Lee retweeted
Founder Mode: paulgraham.com/foundermode.h…
Terry Lee retweeted
In 2002, I was asked by Ed Zschau, übermentor and my former professor of High-tech Entrepreneurship at Princeton University, to come back and speak to the same class about my business adventures in the real world. I was stuck. There were already decamillionaires speaking to the same class, and even though I had built a highly profitable sports supplement company, I marched to a distinctly different drummer.
Over the ensuing days, however, I realized that everyone seemed to be discussing how to build large and successful companies, sell out, and live the good life. Fair enough. The question no one really seemed to be asking or answering was, Why do it all in the first place?
What is the pot of gold that justifies spending the best years of your life hoping for happiness in the last?
Terry Lee retweeted
Nubank is built different.
They've acquired Hyperplane a startup that raised a seed 6 months ago to help banks train models
The do NOT f*ck around
techcrunch.com/2024/06/26/nu…
Terry Lee retweeted
This is the most fun, relaxed, and engaging conversation
I’ve had about Fintech in a long time.
I’m not even going to try and sell it to you.
Just take a listen.
@AlexH_Johnson and @cokiehasiotis nailed this recap of S1 of Fintech Brainfood.
🎧 S1 Recap: Alex Johnson and Cokie Hasiotis Review the B2B Fintech CEOs
Bake Off has Extra Slice; Brainfood has extra nerdiness. We walk through each CEO and compare and contrast.
On Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Terry Lee retweeted
The Grand Reset: VCs and LPs Are Starting To Internalize Reality
The past few years in the VC space have been brutal. Darwin has returned from vacation and the frothy gold rush of the 2018-2021 startup ecosystem has vanished. The ZIRP environment caused valuations to soar and VCs threw money at any startup with a pulse. The money was put to work by Founders quickly, many of whom chased shiny objects and undisciplined growth because their bank accounts were flush with cash.
But a harsh reality set in once we entered a new and higher interest rate economic cycle at the beginning of 2022: The vast majority of the high-flying ZIRP era startups are unlikely to deliver great financial outcomes for their investors and employees.
Early in the correction cycle there was a lot of denial by Founders, VCs and LPs, but this denial has for the most part gone away. For many startups it’s clear that it will be challenging if not impossible to earn their way into their last valuation. For many investors it’s clear that they’re playing to recoup their money (i.e. – playing for pref) rather than playing for “fund returning outcomes”. And for many LPs, they realize that this is an industry wide phenomenon because every active fund manager played the game that was on the field.
This has birthed a phenomenon that can be thought of as "The Grand Reset" where everyone in the ecosystem is seeking the cleanest path to a “do over”.
Venture capitalists know that they have one or two funds that are going to underperform but are excited about their front book opportunities. So the “new deal” they’re making with LPs is that they’ll try to quickly recoup what they can and make the most of the back book in return for being more disciplined going forward.
LPs understand that more investments than normal will fail and they know that absorbing those losses will lead to lower fund performance. LPs realize that the VC asset class is cyclical and great vintages can be created by great managers once the ecosystem flushes out the mistakes produced in an abundant and free flowing capital environment. The “new deal” they’re making with VCs is that they’ll forgive a bad vintage if the VCs will be honest with them about what the back book is “worth”, be more disciplined going forward and they’ll do everything they can to return some cash “soon”.
And many Founders have realized that the ZIRP funding environment hurt their startups in multiple ways. First, their common equity is likely buried under a massive preference stack. Second, too much money caused them to hire too many people and invest in too many projects and undoing this has been challenging. Third, raising capital when a company has been in “shedding mode” rather than “growth mode” is difficult which puts re-booting growth at risk. And finally, the opportunity cost of trying to fix a broken business vs. starting a new one from scratch makes sticking around “expensive”.
The net result of this “Grand Reset” is that there’s no longer incentive for anyone to maintain the illusion they can shepherd mediocre companies towards billion-dollar IPOs that aren’t going to happen. Instead, the focus has shifted towards "landing the plane" for the 90% of companies that aren’t ever going to achieve escape velocity. This generally means navigating an acquihire for struggling companies and helping “good but not great” portfolio companies find exits through acquisitions or mergers even if it means selling for a fraction of their inflated peak valuations.
This shift can be brutal for Founders who envisioned a triumphant IPO. But for many, it's a wake-up call. The pressure to "grow at all costs" has receded, replaced by a need to focus on building sustainable businesses with real revenue models and clear paths to profitability.
And "The Grand Reset" isn't just about selling off inflated companies. It's about resetting expectations on all fronts. VCs are re-evaluating their investment theses, focusing on strong unit economics and caring about capital efficiency. Founders are being forced to build businesses that can turn over cards in a disciplined way and survive without the crutch of endless VC funding. And LPs are seeking to re-up with Funds that have great pre-2018 track records and have a true competitive edge in today’s new normal environment.
This new landscape has its downsides. The flow of easy money has dried up which makes it harder for promising early-stage startups to secure funding. But there are upsides as well. The emphasis on fundamentals could lead to the creation of a new generation of startups built on a foundation of sustainable growth, not just hype.
The Grand Reset represents a significant course correction for the startup ecosystem. It's a painful process, but it could ultimately lead to a healthier and more sustainable future for both VCs and startups alike. As the dust settles, one thing is clear: The era of easy money is over. The startups that emerge from this reset will be the ones that can demonstrate real value and build strong businesses for the long term.
(More on "landing the plane" in a thread next week).
Terry Lee retweeted
When Frank drops knowledge, you should listen:
The Grand Reset: VCs and LPs Are Starting To Internalize Reality
The past few years in the VC space have been brutal. Darwin has returned from vacation and the frothy gold rush of the 2018-2021 startup ecosystem has vanished. The ZIRP environment caused valuations to soar and VCs threw money at any startup with a pulse. The money was put to work by Founders quickly, many of whom chased shiny objects and undisciplined growth because their bank accounts were flush with cash.
But a harsh reality set in once we entered a new and higher interest rate economic cycle at the beginning of 2022: The vast majority of the high-flying ZIRP era startups are unlikely to deliver great financial outcomes for their investors and employees.
Early in the correction cycle there was a lot of denial by Founders, VCs and LPs, but this denial has for the most part gone away. For many startups it’s clear that it will be challenging if not impossible to earn their way into their last valuation. For many investors it’s clear that they’re playing to recoup their money (i.e. – playing for pref) rather than playing for “fund returning outcomes”. And for many LPs, they realize that this is an industry wide phenomenon because every active fund manager played the game that was on the field.
This has birthed a phenomenon that can be thought of as "The Grand Reset" where everyone in the ecosystem is seeking the cleanest path to a “do over”.
Venture capitalists know that they have one or two funds that are going to underperform but are excited about their front book opportunities. So the “new deal” they’re making with LPs is that they’ll try to quickly recoup what they can and make the most of the back book in return for being more disciplined going forward.
LPs understand that more investments than normal will fail and they know that absorbing those losses will lead to lower fund performance. LPs realize that the VC asset class is cyclical and great vintages can be created by great managers once the ecosystem flushes out the mistakes produced in an abundant and free flowing capital environment. The “new deal” they’re making with VCs is that they’ll forgive a bad vintage if the VCs will be honest with them about what the back book is “worth”, be more disciplined going forward and they’ll do everything they can to return some cash “soon”.
And many Founders have realized that the ZIRP funding environment hurt their startups in multiple ways. First, their common equity is likely buried under a massive preference stack. Second, too much money caused them to hire too many people and invest in too many projects and undoing this has been challenging. Third, raising capital when a company has been in “shedding mode” rather than “growth mode” is difficult which puts re-booting growth at risk. And finally, the opportunity cost of trying to fix a broken business vs. starting a new one from scratch makes sticking around “expensive”.
The net result of this “Grand Reset” is that there’s no longer incentive for anyone to maintain the illusion they can shepherd mediocre companies towards billion-dollar IPOs that aren’t going to happen. Instead, the focus has shifted towards "landing the plane" for the 90% of companies that aren’t ever going to achieve escape velocity. This generally means navigating an acquihire for struggling companies and helping “good but not great” portfolio companies find exits through acquisitions or mergers even if it means selling for a fraction of their inflated peak valuations.
This shift can be brutal for Founders who envisioned a triumphant IPO. But for many, it's a wake-up call. The pressure to "grow at all costs" has receded, replaced by a need to focus on building sustainable businesses with real revenue models and clear paths to profitability.
And "The Grand Reset" isn't just about selling off inflated companies. It's about resetting expectations on all fronts. VCs are re-evaluating their investment theses, focusing on strong unit economics and caring about capital efficiency. Founders are being forced to build businesses that can turn over cards in a disciplined way and survive without the crutch of endless VC funding. And LPs are seeking to re-up with Funds that have great pre-2018 track records and have a true competitive edge in today’s new normal environment.
This new landscape has its downsides. The flow of easy money has dried up which makes it harder for promising early-stage startups to secure funding. But there are upsides as well. The emphasis on fundamentals could lead to the creation of a new generation of startups built on a foundation of sustainable growth, not just hype.
The Grand Reset represents a significant course correction for the startup ecosystem. It's a painful process, but it could ultimately lead to a healthier and more sustainable future for both VCs and startups alike. As the dust settles, one thing is clear: The era of easy money is over. The startups that emerge from this reset will be the ones that can demonstrate real value and build strong businesses for the long term.
(More on "landing the plane" in a thread next week).
Terry Lee retweeted
ChatGPT can now see, hear, and speak. Rolling out over next two weeks, Plus users will be able to have voice conversations with ChatGPT (iOS & Android) and to include images in conversations (all platforms).
openai.com/blog/chatgpt-can-…
Terry Lee retweeted
Ania (Hampton member) is on track to build a 1 employee, $10m/year business.
Her numbers are crazy.
- Rootd: app for panic attacks
- Outsourced dev
- 2m users, 37k app reviews
- 7-figures in recurring revenue
- No full time employees
WILD
blog.joinhampton.com/bootstr…
Terry Lee retweeted
Good call by Google.
Google bans personal loan apps from accessing user contacts finextra.com/newsarticle/421… via @Finextra
Terry Lee retweeted
Before he was “George Clooney,” George Clooney was just a guy.
A guy nobody knew.
A guy getting repeatedly rejected.
Clooney was desperate in those early days.
He wanted directors to like him.
But audition after audition, he heard another “no.”
The rejection crushed him.
• Clooney blamed Hollywood
• He blamed directors and producers
• He blamed the “system” for his failures
And then, everything changed.
***
LESSON 1: Perspective is everything
Instead of blaming, Clooney shifted his perspective.
He recognized that not only did he want the role, but directors wanted to say YES.
Rather than hoping for that yes, Clooney began walking into auditions believing he was the man for the job.
• He listened to the directors
• He embodied the nuances of the role
• He projected a newfound confidence
With this subtle shift, Clooney’s performance transformed.
***
LESSON 2: Be the solution
Clooney recognized the problem facing directors.
Auditions were painstaking for them, too.
They didn’t want to waste time in them.
They wanted to find the perfect person for the role.
So, Clooney began approaching auditions that way.
His “customer” had a problem, and he had the solution.
We all face numerous problems in life.
More often than not, YOU are the solution.
***
LESSON 3: Be service-minded
The “old” Clooney approached auditions thinking about what he could gain.
Roles. Fame. Status. Riches. Success.
But he got that stuff only when he made his work about serving.
• Serving the role
• Serving the directors
• Serving the spirit of the work
If you want success, be of service.
***
Be the solution.
Be service-minded.
And remember, perspective is everything.
***
Follow @TMitrosilis for more content like this.
Terry Lee retweeted
Any fintech companies out there hiring for business development/partnerships?
I've got a great woman who is looking for a new role. Lots of experience managing strategic partners and making sure shit gets done across product, marketing, and sales.
Terry Lee retweeted
This is absolutely wonderful.
We should all say "I don't know" a whole lot more than we do.
I don’t write often, but when I do it’s because something is driving me absolutely nuts.
So, after a couple weeks of screaming at my phone screen I finally put fingers to keyboard…
The Everything Expert and how to avoid falling into their trap 👇 forfintechsake.com/p/the-eve…
Terry Lee retweeted
Replying to @fintechjunkie
I'd like a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage, but I'd also like my bank to take no duration risk and be able to liquidate its assets immediately.
Terry Lee retweeted
If any founders have questions about SVB, FDIC insurance, or the mechanics of how things are going to work starting on Monday morning, Shamir I’d your guy.
Terry Lee retweeted
Silicon Valley Bank’s shareholders and executives lose it all, as they should. Depositors in good faith, however, should recover and have access to their deposits in order to meet their payrolls, pay their suppliers, and to prevent contagion.
Terry Lee retweeted
It's a scenario every American parent replays in their mind #schoolshootings #guns
Terry Lee retweeted
Spoke with a smart CEO of a major dealer group today.
He believes that used car prices have BOTTOMED.
And it’s only ⬆️ from here…
Here are his 3 reasons why:
Terry Lee retweeted
Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.
57%Yes
43%No
17,502,391 votes • Final results




















