Teaching Economics retweeted
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter.
AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country.
Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty.
The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.
images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-W…
Teaching Economics retweeted
Don't make the mistake of thinking this is about his infidelity. These articles will not stop until he agrees to follow Anthropic's proposal to block inference for unsigned and registered open-models in the firmware of modern GPUs.
This is a pretty transparent concerted effort at centralizing control over compute ressources and the ability to execute ever more powerful local models. Jensen is the tip of the spear pushing back at this (in part for his own economic reasons).
I'm team Jensen, his affairs are none of my business, not even the alleged support of circumvention of export controls are my business, his position on open-weight models is.
Jensen Huang must go
We argue in @TheEconomist that his position is untenable
"Like many powerful leaders, he came to believe that he was too important for the normal rules to apply to him."
But he is not the only one. Howard Lutnick has failed to stem the flow of chips to China. More heads should roll
Teaching Economics retweeted
🚨 AMAZING: Gov. Ron DeSantis has paid off 54% of ALL the debt Florida ever racked up, and cut the budget 4 years STRAIGHT.
That is how you run a state. PROUD to be a Floridian!
Teaching Economics retweeted
Why are some privileged Nepalis so against facilitating data center investments when around 1,000 MW of electricity are already going to waste daily?
Govt tax revenue from this alone would be around Rs 3.6 billion per year-money govt could invest in primary health & education.
Teaching Economics retweeted
“Ser comunista, inteligente y bueno es totalmente incompatible. El que es inteligente y bueno no es comunista. El que es comunista y bueno no es inteligente. Y por supuesto, el que es comunista e inteligente, es imposible que sea bueno”
A. Solzhenitsyn
Teaching Economics retweeted
No. This is the TRUTH, you moron.
Fascism and neoliberalism are natural siblings because they’re both willing to treat parts of society as collateral damage.
@IsabellaMWeber on the Better Future podcast:
Teaching Economics retweeted
Earlier today I wrote that school destroys critical thinking. Many of you asked for proof.
The proof is Marx.
Marxism is probably the most tested theory in human history. Tested on paper by the best economists in the world. Tested at full scale on hundreds of millions of people, across several continents, for more than a century. And it failed every single test.
A free mind, one that checks its ideas against reality, cannot remain Marxist. If so many people still are, it's not a problem of intelligence. It's a problem of method. They were never taught to verify.
Let's start from the beginning.
In 1867, Marx publishes Das Kapital. Everything rests on one idea: the value of a good comes from the amount of labor it contains. The boss's profit is therefore labor stolen from the worker.
Four years later, in 1871, Menger and Jevons independently show that this is wrong. Value doesn't come from labor. It comes from the usefulness the buyer sees in the good. An hour spent digging a useless hole creates zero value. That's the marginal revolution, and all of modern economics is built on it.
In 1896, Böhm-Bawerk shows that Marx's system contradicts itself: real prices don't match labor values, and Marx knew it. The foundation collapses.
In 1920, Mises asks the question that kills it: without private property, there are no market prices. Without prices, how does a central planner know what to produce, how much, and with which resources? Answer: he can't. Hayek finishes the job in 1945: economic knowledge is scattered across millions of minds, and no central bureau can ever gather it.
That's the theory. Now the predictions.
Marx predicted the revolution would break out in the most industrialized countries, England and Germany. It happened in Russia, an agrarian country. Wrong.
He predicted workers would grow poorer and poorer under capitalism. They grew richer than at any point in history. Wrong.
He predicted the State would wither away. Everywhere his ideas were applied, the State became total. Wrong.
Now the experiments.
USSR: forced collectivization, famine in Ukraine, millions dead, the Gulag.
China: Mao's Great Leap Forward. Between 15 and 45 million dead depending on the historian. The largest famine in human history, produced by a plan.
Cambodia: the Khmer Rouge killed roughly a quarter of their own population in four years.
Then there are the natural experiments. The most brutal ones, because they eliminate every excuse.
Korea. Same people, same language, same culture, same history. In 1945, the North was richer than the South. Today, income per person in the South is about 29 times higher than in the North. Only one variable changed: the system.
Germany. One people cut in two. One side had to build a wall. Not to keep people out. To keep them in.
Venezuela. The largest proven oil reserves on the planet. Nearly 8 million people fled the country. 21st-century socialism ended with Maduro captured last January.
Meanwhile, the other system, the one you were taught to hate, did this: in 1820, about three quarters of humanity lived in extreme poverty. Today, around 10%. And the biggest escape from poverty in history, China after 1978, happened at the exact moment the Communist Party brought markets back.
From Marx to Maduro, 150 years of data. All pointing the same way.
So how does anyone stay Marxist?
With the magic sentence: "that wasn't real communism."
Think about what that sentence means. A theory that fails every time it's tried, whose believers then declare that none of the attempts counted, is no longer a theory. It's a faith. Karl Popper saw it as early as 1945: Marxism survived its refutations by making itself irrefutable.
A mind trained to think for itself asks one question: how many failures does it take before you question the hypothesis? One, two, ten, forty?
That's exactly the question school never teaches you to ask.
Marx isn't taught as a hypothesis to test against the data. He's taught as a morality tale: there are oppressors and oppressed, and the right side is obvious. You learn the conclusion, never the method.
A four-year-old would ask: "Okay, but where did it work?" Fifteen years of schooling later, they've stopped asking.
A system that teaches you to obey has no interest in teaching you to verify. Because the day you start verifying is the day you start being free.
And that day, you stop being a Marxist.
A few years ago, Peter Thiel wrote to Mark Zuckerberg: 70% of Millennials say they're pro-socialist.
His conclusion: stop calling them stupid, and try to understand why.
His explanation was economic. Too much student debt, unaffordable housing, no capital. When you own nothing, you have no reason to defend the system.
He's right. But that's only half the story.
The other half is school.
School destroys critical thinking. Methodically. For fifteen years.
You learn to recite instead of question. To find the expected answer instead of the true one. To obey authority instead of reasoning for yourself.
When you've spent your youth outsourcing your thinking to an institution, it feels natural to outsource your life to an even bigger one: the State.
That's why so many end up Marxist. Not by conviction. By conditioning.
And that conditioning is about to become a handicap.
We're entering a world where AI does everything conformist, predictable and standardized better than we do. The only value left is thinking differently.
To create value tomorrow, you'll need to be neurodivergent.
And someone who thinks differently and reasons from first principles almost always ends up seeing the same thing: the State, as it works today, destroys more value than it creates.
It's no accident that Alex Karp created a fellowship at Palantir dedicated to neurodivergent talent. To him, in the age of AI, there are only two ways to have a future: master a real trade, or be neurodivergent.
But I'll go further than Karp.
I believe neurodivergence isn't the exception. It's the natural state of the human mind.
Look at a four-year-old. They ask hundreds of questions a day. They take everything apart. They refuse any rule they don't understand. They think from first principles without even knowing it's a thing.
Then they go to school. And we spend fifteen years normalizing them.
School doesn't shape minds. It sands them down.
The future belongs to those who survived the sanding.
Teaching Economics retweeted
Nepali brainrot leftist really want de-growth agenda for Nepal. Unlike their western counterpart, it is not coming out of concern of environment, it is just posturing and and to get seat in high table.
Whatever Swarnim Wagle is doing is common sense.
Nepal’s neoliberal finance minister and ex-World Bank economist Swarnim Wagle is in Time magazine’s list of the 100 most influential climate leaders of 2026. Why? Because he wants to attract and greenlight US tech companies to build data centers in the Nepal Himalaya.
#USempire
Teaching Economics retweeted
The most simple socialist revolution can be launched today.
Start a company.
Make the shares owned by the workers.
Talk to customers, improve the product, promote it every day.
Teaching Economics retweeted
Replying to @IsabellaMWeber
Teaching Economics retweeted
People have no idea how sophisticated nation state activities are
If you are a target of opportunity for China it’s not unheard of for them to dedicate O(1000) humans dedicated to compromising you
This is what happened w their NYT hack in 2013, which was designed to send a message
They will compromise your friend’s friend’s friend to compromise you
And work down that chain until your friend invites you on a fun trip on a private plane to Mexico/Thailand/wherever (example)
Where some night you have a very boozy dinner and then you show back up at the house and some girls are there
You’re drunk and make a mistake and then you’re owned until you’re disposable
Nation state kompromat for “target’s of choice” is a system designed to find any individual’s weakness (you’re bisexual; a gambler, an alcoholic, drug addict, have a debt, adulterous, etc) and then force them into a situation of maximum amplification of this weakness
99% of people can be compromised using nation state capabilities and tactics
nytimes.com/2013/01/31/techn…
Teaching Economics retweeted
Dwarkesh: Why would we want to sell China the materials for a serious cyberweapon? It's like selling them nukes with a casing that says 'made by Boeing' and claiming that's good for the US
Jensen: Comparing AI to nukes is lunacy. Enriched uranium is a lousy analogy. It's an illogical analogy. What we have to recognize is that AI is a five-layered cake.
Teaching Economics retweeted
There are only three ways a smart person can go broke: liquor, ladies, and leverage.
Teaching Economics retweeted
Women don't know how to actually problem solve, so they will just shame you until you figure some way to fix it yourself. Even when you can't.














































