In the newly dropped “bombshell evidence” this morning by Baker and associates about the Cole case, the actual question that would matter was still not addressed. Let me remind you all the actual question, since it’s hard to figure out after being told about everything but that. Is the person in the hoodie in that video Cole or not? That was never answered. Let’s pretend every word of what they said this morning was true. The figure was carrying a gun, okay but prove it wasn’t Cole. Baker says himself that Cole owned two handguns and boxes of 9mm and .45 ammunition [58:05]. A gun on the bomber is just as consistent with Cole as with a cop. If anything, it fits him more. No mention again of the purchases, his phone's location, his car on the plate reader, the components found at his home, or the confession. No clarification about their own alibi video, the north-side clip with the unverified clocks. What it does do: •It keeps the "it was a cop" story alive. That story matters to Baker personally. He's being sued for naming a former Capitol Police officer, and a "the bomber was police" narrative is his public defense. •It changes the subject. Instead of "was it Cole?" the audience is now arguing about holsters, hand mics and fabric lines, the same way on Secret America Baker got them arguing about sandwiches and bushes. •It creates new FBI "failures." "Why didn't they seize his guns?" and "why didn't they evacuate the neighbors?" turn into evidence of a cover-up, even though the FBI never claimed the bomber had a gun. They're faulting the FBI for not acting on their theory which feeds their content schedule. The teaser, the reveal, the sponsor read, the $5 subscription plug. Even if the bomber was carrying a gun, Baker says Cole owned guns, so this doesn't exclude Cole. It doesn't address the phone, the purchases, the car or the confession, and it doesn't even mention their own alibi video from four days ago. Why do this? So people can’t even remember the actual question in the case anymore.

When is justice coming for Brian Cole?

No grift? Here’s the link to the merch store. Also, maybe O’Boyle should quit peddling his family’s difficulties, cut bait, and get a JOB like every other citizen who can’t work it out with an employer. Odd how the IRS whistleblowers never lost their jobs — because they did it the right way — these FBI “whistleblowers” have turned themselves into absolute pariahs. Happy shopping. the-suspendables.com/

Careful Kyle, Sarah Connor is tracking you (extreme sarcasm). Surely, Sarah knows that civil defamation is not the same as "pressing charges", right?

No one is withholding “relevant” information … and you can pass that along to that dumb twat who “thinks freely.” (I can’t respond to her ignorance and lies due to the mutual block.) Brian’s injury was to his LEFT leg. Kerkhoff’s injury was to her RIGHT leg. It’s why Brian CANNOT be the bomber. The Hoodied bomber drags and circumvents her RIGHT leg. Brian slightly slings his left leg forward. Hoodie is right foot pigeon toed. Brian walks with both feet pointed outward. They are not the same. Any HONEST person can see this without any gait rec software or expertise. But TwatThinksFreely is not an honest person.

Please keep sharing this video widely. Six days after conclusively revealing that Brian Cole Jr. cannot be the J6 b0mber, it may seem we are being ignored, but I can report that "official Washington" is absolutely VERY aware of this video and its implications. That includes MSM outlets, Congress, DOJ, FBI, etc. @accabbat has updated this to include a couple more of Brian's clothing items with the tags still hanging. On Thursday, I went back into Brian's room to dig around for more clues, and sure enough, I found several more jackets and pullovers with the tags still on them. (Original thread linked in first comment, with our longer "explainer" video.) ⬇️

MAJOR QUESTIONS emerge over the January 6 pipe bomber investigation! @alexstein99 challenges the case against the accused suspect as @Timcast raises serious concerns about surveillance footage, the suspect's movements, and whether investigators have the right person. The panel questions whether the FBI's evidence actually adds up, or if crucial details are being overlooked. @rondeaulivia @rebekazeljko