Retired Cop, Founder @SuperSkills Construction Training. Gooner. Classic car buff. Woodworker.

Yorkshire
Joined February 2009
Peter Walker retweeted
🚨 24 AI PROMPTS TO CREATE BETTER CONTENT! Stop staring at a blank page. Let AI help you plan, write, edit, and grow your content faster. 🚀 🔥 Plan your content calendar ✍️ Write stronger hooks & posts 📌 Create Pinterest content ♻️ Repurpose one idea into 5 posts 🎯 Match your unique brand voice 📊 Analyze results & improve your strategy ✅ Fact-check and refine your content These 24 prompts can help you turn scattered ideas into a consistent content system. 💡 Save this cheat sheet. Your next great post might start with one of these prompts. Follow @Arzu_with_Ai for more AI tools, prompts & productivity tips. 🔥
13
40
105
2,387
So husbands are back in charge of what their wives say? Good luck with that in my house 🏠
The man entrusted with Britain's national security is married to a journalist who publicly questioned the testimony of Israeli rape victims, sneered at solidarity with Israel the day after October 7, and told James O'Brien he could "do better" than calling Hamas a "murderous death cult". You'd have expected Sarah Helm to keep her head down while questions swirl about her husband, Jonathan Powell. You'd have expected wrong. On Monday, she waded in to defend the Palestine poppy, days after the Telegraph revealed that its creator, an NHS doctor, had circulated an image comparing Israel to a cancer. Helm is entitled to her opinions, however grotesque. But when your husband is privy to the nation's deepest secrets, they cease to be a family matter. Powell owes the public answers. The Cabinet Office owes us an explanation of what safeguards exist. And he should step down. My latest column (link in first reply) 👇
38
Peter Walker retweeted
Google is now literally telling businesses specifically how to get traffic from AI Search. Yes, directly within Google Search Console. It's probably one of the most important marketing updates of 2026. Let’s go through it. By the way, you can see whether your business is appearing across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Grok here (it's free): seo-stuff.com/free-audit Recently Google launched a new Generative AI performance report inside Search Console. At first, it looked like a very limited rollout, but now more and more site owners are seeing it. John Mueller also confirmed that Google is rolling it out incrementally and reviewing feedback along the way. So if you do not see it yet, give it a few days, but the direction is pretty clear. AI Search visibility is becoming something businesses can actually measure, and this report shows how often URLs from your site appear in Google’s generative AI features. Yes, that includes AI Overviews and AI Mode. It can also show which pages appeared, which countries the impressions came from, which devices people were using and how performance changed over time. That matters a lot, because until now, a lot of AI Search tracking has been messy. It has featured a lot of screenshots, manual prompt testing, third party tools, guessing from referral traffic, watching ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok and Google manually to see whether your brand appears, etc. Now Google is giving site owners a direct view into whether their pages are appearing inside Google’s own AI features. There is one big limitation, though: this is impression data as opposed to clicks data. Google is showing whether your site appeared inside generative AI features, but it is not yet showing how many people clicked from those AI features to your site. This is where SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack…) can help. A business can be visible in AI Search and still see fewer clicks than it used to get from traditional search. At the same time, a business can also be completely missing from AI Search and not realize competitors are being shown instead. If your AI impressions are high but clicks are weak, the issue may be the way Google is satisfying the search before the user visits your site. If your AI impressions are low, the issue may be that Google does not understand, trust or retrieve your pages for the questions customers are asking. If only your informational pages appear, but your product, service, pricing, comparison and case study pages do not, that tells you something. If one country shows AI visibility and another does not, that tells you something. If a few pages get most of the AI impressions, that tells you something. This is why the report is such a big deal, and it gives businesses a starting point so you can finally ask better questions. Which pages are showing up in AI Overviews? Which pages are showing up in AI Mode? Which countries are seeing the brand? Which devices are seeing the brand? Which parts of the buying journey are missing? Which content is actually being used by Google’s AI systems? That last question is the one most businesses should care about, and it is the one SEO Stuff solves for brands on a daily basis: seo-stuff.com/premium-conten… A customer can ask a long, complicated question and Google can break that question into several related searches behind the scenes. That means the same business may need useful content around problems, use cases, comparisons, pricing, alternatives, industries, objections, case studies, product details and implementation. One generic service page probably will not cover all of that. A brand with useful content across the full buying journey has more chances to be discovered. Google’s new report will make that easier to see. And this also lines up with what Google just said in its “Good SEO is good GEO” piece. (See my post from yesterday if you missed it.) Google said its generative AI features are rooted in the same core ranking and quality systems as traditional Search. AI Mode and AI Overviews retrieve up-to-date content from Google’s existing search index. So the businesses that want AI visibility still need the same boring foundation: crawlable content, useful pages, clear product information, real expertise, entity clarity, authority, third party validation, etc. That is where SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com) comes in. The done-for-you package combines 10 AI-search-optimized articles with three DR50+ authority placements: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… The content helps your business cover the questions customers ask before buying, including problems, use cases, comparisons, pricing, alternatives, industries, objections, case studies, product details and implementation. The authority placements help your business show up across trusted sources that search and AI systems use to understand categories. Google is starting to show businesses whether they are appearing in AI Search. Once something becomes a report, it becomes something clients, founders, CMOs and competitors start paying attention to. If you want to see whether your business is already being cited, understood and recommended across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Grok, check here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit
Almost 73% of the websites cited across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity appeared in just ONE of them. Only 2.2% were cited by all four. So if you are checking ChatGPT to see whether your company is “showing up in AI search,” you may be looking at a very incomplete picture. A new study gives us a useful look at just how differently the major AI platforms research and cite the web. Let’s go through it. And if you want to see where your business stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI, Perplexity, Grok and broader AI search, start here. It’s free: seo-stuff.com/free-audit Prefer ran the same 80 questions through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Each question was tested three times on each platform, and that produced 960 AI answers and 1,329 different cited websites. The results were pretty interesting. 966 of those websites appeared in only one AI engine. 205 appeared in two. 129 appeared in three. Just 29 appeared across all four. Basically, there really was no universal “AI search result.” Different systems can research the exact same topic and pull information from very different parts of the web. SEO Stuff's Done-for-you setup was created with this in mind: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… The number of sources they cited was dramatically different too. Perplexity averaged 19.48 sources per answer. Gemini averaged 8.64. Claude averaged 4.58. ChatGPT averaged just 3.05. Across the 240 answers generated by each platform, Perplexity cited 748 different websites, Gemini 580, Claude 333 and ChatGPT 218. That is why asking “How do I rank in AI?” is not as informative as it sounds. The questions that make a bit more sense (and will help you more long-term) are: How often do I appear in ChatGPT? What does Claude know about my company? Which sources does Perplexity trust in my category? What is Gemini surfacing for the questions my buyers ask? There was another important finding, by the way. The researchers asked the same questions three times within seconds of each other, yet the cited websites still changed. Average overlap between repeat runs was: 96% for Perplexity. 68% for Claude. 37% for ChatGPT. 35% for Gemini. Same question. That matters enormously for measurement because if you ask ChatGPT one question once and do not see your company, that does not necessarily mean you never appear. And if you do see your company once, that does not mean you reliably own that answer either. You need repeated measurements across multiple prompts and multiple platforms, otherwise you can end up building an entire AI strategy around a screenshot. So what about sources? Well, Reddit appeared in 207 of the 960 answers, making it the most frequently cited site in the study. Claude cited Reddit zero times. Gemini cited YouTube in 113 answers. ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity cited YouTube zero times in this dataset. Perplexity cited LinkedIn in 73 answers. Claude cited it twice. ChatGPT and Gemini did not cite it at all. Again, the study focused on 80 questions about AI search, GEO and AEO. Healthcare, finance, ecommerce or local-service prompts could produce a very different source mix, but the larger point is difficult to ignore. Different AI systems have different retrieval behavior, different source ecosystems and different levels of citation consistency. That said, the biggest authoritative sources traveled much better across platforms. Among the 25 most-cited sites, 23 appeared across three or four engines. Five of the top 10 appeared across all four. So the fragmentation was much heavier in the long tail, and that may actually be the most useful takeaway for businesses. You want enough content breadth to appear across many relevant questions, but you also want enough authority that multiple systems repeatedly trust your website and the third-party sources validating your company. That is where traditional SEO and AI Search Optimization start overlapping again. Build useful content around the questions buyers actually ask. Make your company, products and category easy to understand. Earn credible third-party mentions and contextual backlinks. Create comparisons, alternatives, use cases and decision-stage content. That is exactly why SEO Stuff approaches AI visibility across multiple platforms rather than treating it as a ChatGPT-only exercise: seo-stuff.com/ A company can perform well in ChatGPT and poorly in Claude. If your company only measures one AI platform, you may be missing most of the picture. And if you want to see where your business stands across Google, ChatGPT, Claude and the major AI search platforms, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit
77
86
4
778
119,283
Peter Walker retweeted
Trump is extremely upset he didn't get the Nobel Peace Prize… 🤣🤣🤣
22
340
12
1,573
62,838
Peter Walker retweeted
There's a reason @TheOfficialGRB doesn't have many gaps in his diary....... 💯
Before & after. This porch is one I completed. Finished in Sikkens XD Gloss. My go-to for all exterior woodwork. Gutter & fascia finished in soft sheen black. I also restored the door furniture to finish it all off. Step was stripped back & finished in Sadolin Exta wood stain.
1
12
Peter Walker retweeted
Before & after. This porch is one I completed. Finished in Sikkens XD Gloss. My go-to for all exterior woodwork. Gutter & fascia finished in soft sheen black. I also restored the door furniture to finish it all off. Step was stripped back & finished in Sadolin Exta wood stain.
5
2
2
100
2,228
"The Greens have lost their party. And they aren’t going to get it back. This is who they are now." Powerful words from @Dannythefink in today's @thetimes thetimes.com/article/79f5a0e…
45
So this random guy came in to interview for Gas Monkey.... Should I hire him? Let me know in the comments. @DxmnItBobby #gasmonkeygarage #richardrawlings #cars #funny #mechanic
27
14
260
19,007
Peter Walker retweeted
One of my newsletter readers asked me what content + SEO people should stop doing in 2026 (and what they should do instead.) Here are my recommendations in this zero click era, as @amandanat calls it:
1
2
1
718
Peter Walker retweeted
2
7
540
True. @RishiSunak's my MP. Quietly goes about his constituency work and provides fantastic support for the community he now calls home.
I am still outraged Keir Starmer spent four years goading Rishi Sunak that he’d “run off to California” when he stopped being PM. Only for Keir to quit after being ousted, while putting himself in the shop window for any going international roles, whilst Rishi remains an MP
1
2
85
When Sturgeon “launched” the first ferry, the Glen Sannox, in 2017 to great fanfare, the windows were painted on, the funnel was made of plywood and an inspector had rejected the bow design Excellent reminder by @emmacduncan why public procurement has rules in today's @thetimes
1
41
"Excuse me, could I just squeeze through?" 🐑 Rush hour in Yorkshire. – at Yorkshire and The Humber, England
27
288
13
2,288
18,320
Peter Walker retweeted
7/ Clear your recent files list Windows + R → type: recent → Enter Every document you've opened is listed here. 
Select all → Delete. Then: File Explorer → three dots → Options → untick:
• Show recently used files
• Show frequently used folders
→ Clear Why does Windows keep all this? Speed and convenience. But it survives everything you do to "clean up." 
Deleting a file doesn't touch its thumbnail. 
Uninstalling an app doesn't touch its Prefetch record. Save this thread. Share it with someone who thinks they've cleaned their PC 🔖
10
43
1
169
24,826
Peter Walker retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Andy Burnham will announce a new "Help to Buy" scheme next week Called "Your First Home", it will allow young people to buy their first home with a deposit of just 2.5%
1,164
825
1,002
26,585
6,469,429
Peter Walker retweeted
If you want ChatGPT to recommend your business when someone asks who they should buy from, there is a pretty straightforward opportunity hiding in plain sight. New data across 289,105 cited URLs across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews and Perplexity offers a unique window into what matters most. Let’s go through it. And if you want to see whether ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI, Perplexity, Grok and broader AI search are already recommending your business, start here (it's free): seo-stuff.com/free-audit Surfer analyzed nearly 1000 prompts across 12 industries, generating 26,573 AI calls and 289,105 cited URLs over seven days. Then they asked a fairly simple question: When an AI system recommends several brands, is there a relationship between how prominently each brand appears and how many of the cited sources mention that brand? Spoiler alert: there was. Brands mentioned across a larger share of the sources being used by the AI tended to appear higher in the response. Obviously that does NOT mean Surfer proved that brand mentions cause higher AI rankings, but the relationship is strong enough that businesses working on AI visibility should probably pay attention. Think about how this can work. Someone asks: “What are the best accounting platforms for a small nonprofit?” The AI retrieves information from several sources. Maybe multiple articles mention Company A, compare it with competitors and describe its use cases. Company B appears once. Company A now has a much larger body of information surrounding it across the source set. Your website matters, but the wider web matters too, and the results became even more interesting when Surfer broke them down by platform. ChatGPT showed the strongest relationship between brand presence across cited sources and recommendation position among the systems tested. It also cited substantially more sources in this dataset: 84.7% more than Google AI Mode and 129.7% more than Google AI Overviews. So if ChatGPT is working from a larger source pool, there are potentially more places where your brand can either appear or be absent. This is why treating AI Search Optimization as something that happens entirely on your own website does not make much sense. Your website is one source and the system may be looking at many others. And if your competitors repeatedly appear across those sources while your business does not, they are giving the AI a much broader information footprint to work with. That is exactly why SEO Stuff combines content with authority: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… The content side helps your own website explain who you are, what you do, who you serve, which problems you solve, how you compare and what buyers should know. The authority side creates additional third-party references around the company. There is an important distinction here though, as this study measured BRAND MENTIONS, not backlinks. A backlink can still matter for traditional SEO, but Surfer measured whether the cited page actually mentioned the brand. That means a good editorial placement can potentially do two different jobs. It can provide a legitimate backlink that supports traditional search authority, while also putting your brand, category and context onto a third-party page an AI system may encounter. The research found something particularly interesting about blogs too. Brand-owned blogs represented 16.2% of cited sources and third-party blogs another 12.5%, meaning blogs accounted for 28.7% of the cited source set. But brand mentions appearing in blog content showed the strongest correlation with recommendation position of any content type Surfer analyzed. That matters because blogs are one of the areas businesses can actually influence. You can publish useful content, create original research, contribute expert commentary, earn editorial coverage and get included in relevant industry articles. But one of the most valuable things you can do is identify the pages AI systems already cite for the commercial questions your customers ask. Do not just think: “I need more backlinks.” Think: “What does ChatGPT cite when someone asks who the best company in my category is?” “What sources does Google AI Mode use?” “Which comparison pages keep showing up?” “Which of those pages mention my competitors but not me?” That creates a much more useful target list than simply sorting websites by Domain Rating. If you're starting from scratch today, here's how I'd play it: Start with the commercial questions that matter, then look at the sources AI systems actually use when answering them. Which brands keep appearing? Which websites keep getting cited? Where are competitors mentioned? Where are you missing? Then work on both sides. Build your own content so AI systems have accurate, useful first-party information about your company, and build a credible third-party footprint so your website is not the only place on the internet associating your brand with the category. That is increasingly what AI Search Optimization looks like. Useful content, commercial topic coverage, clear brand information, relevant third-party mentions and contextual authority across the web. And if you want to see where your business currently stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI, Perplexity, Grok and broader AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit
A brand followed the advice in this article and added more than $50,000 from Google, ChatGPT and Perplexity-driven traffic.
25
28
2
89
143,411
Peter Walker retweeted
Netflix has 260 million subscribers. Netflix is betting that 250 million of them never open the settings menu. One guy did. He worked Netflix customer support for 3 years. Handled 15,000 complaints. He told me something that should change the way you watch tonight: "Every single complaint I got for 3 years was caused by the same 10 settings. Not bugs. Not content. Settings." "'Why is my picture blurry?' Because Netflix set your streaming quality to Auto — which doesn't mean best quality. It means lowest quality Netflix can get away with before you notice." "'Why are my recommendations terrible?' Because 3 people are watching on your profile and the algorithm thinks you're one person who loves true crime, kids cartoons, and Korean dramas at the same time." "'Why does every movie look like a soap opera?' Because a motion smoothing setting you've never seen is turned on — making a $200 million film look like it was shot on a phone." "'Why do I scroll for 45 minutes and give up?' Because autoplay previews are feeding the algorithm false data every single time you pause on a thumbnail. Netflix thinks you're interested. You were just reading the description." "I spent 3 years answering the same 10 complaints. Every single time the fix was the same: 'Let me walk you through your settings.' Every single time the customer said: 'Why didn't Netflix tell me this?'" "Because Netflix makes more money when you scroll. Not when you find something." Here are 10 Netflix settings that are ruining your experience right now — and exactly how to fix each one in under 5 minutes: 🧵
95
824
33
4,061
1,529,776
Peter Walker retweeted
X is literally paying Meta, Reddit, and LinkedIn to tell you how cheap X ads are. You can’t make this stuff up. And... they’re not wrong. After spending $100k+ a month on X ads, I’ve seen $2 CPMs. But cheap traffic can still get REALLY expensive. Before spending a dollar on X ads: 1. Dial in the audience. You will probably need to test multiple audiences before finding the right one. 2. Make ads specifically for X. I constantly see brands copy and paste their Meta ads onto X. They usually don’t work. Different platform. Different audience. Different creative. 3. Get conversion tracking working perfectly. If X doesn’t know who is converting, you’re basically asking it to guess who to show your ads to. Stop trying to make one campaign do everything. I like running at least 3: - Campaign 1: Get followers - Campaign 2: Build relationships - Campaign 3: Retarget everyone who already knows you Most businesses do the opposite. They run one cold ad straight to an offer and wonder why X “doesn’t work.” X isn’t Meta with cheaper CPMs. It’s a completely different channel. Build the relationship first. Then make sure they never forget about you.
4
1
20
937
Peter Walker retweeted
I was a very fortunate kid. My dad's GP surgery sat between the Dell and Hampshire's County Ground, so at weekends I could go to a game and get a lift home afterwards. It left me with a passion for both sports and a belief that sport opens a window onto who we are. When I was growing up, the Tebbit test was a matter of intense debate. Which side did you cheer for at the cricket? For all the criticism it received, it was a test anyone could pass. If you supported England because you saw it as home, you were part of the team regardless of the colour of your skin. Born in Southampton, 10 year old me passed it without even knowing about it. Giving the @MCCOfficial's Cowdrey Lecture on Thursday made me think about cricket's place in our national life and the current arguments about identity. In Britain we've built the world's most successful multi-faith, multi-ethnic democracy. I was a beneficiary of it. Whatever issues people had with me as PM (and there was no shortage) my race and religion weren't among them. I could read a lesson at the King's coronation or light Diwali diyas on Downing Street with my daughters without controversy. Foreign leaders assumed these must be huge symbolic moments. For most Brits, they just weren't that big a deal. But Britain's democratic achievement is now under strain. Some of the challenges are ones I've written about before, like Islamism, and the failure of governments, including the one I led, to adequately control immigration. But something else is going on - a risk that we start equating skin colour with nationality. After I left office, a debate kicked off here on @X about whether I was English at all, because I was a "brown Hindu". During the election campaign I'd been shocked when footage was broadcast of someone calling me a "Paki." It was shocking precisely because it was so unusual. That kind of abuse had simply not been a feature of my political life. But the Englishness argument was stranger still. Call it the reverse Tebbit test. If you're not white, it no longer matters who you support at the cricket, because you can never be English. It's a test no non-white person can ever pass. I have no truck with people who offend our sense of fairness and come here illegally; I spent half my premiership trying to deport them to Rwanda. I think the bar for legal migration should be high. It is entirely possible to want a radical reduction in immigration and a far more robust approach to integration, and still totally reject the attempt to turn Britishness into a DNA test. If you're born and brought up in England and view it as home, what are you other than English? Denying people their Englishness or their Britishness because of the colour of their skin is a recipe for alienation and a two-tier society. How are children who hear this meant to feel? Sport can play a small but significant role here. Cricket is played by nearly every major ethnic group in this country. Ask what my largely white rural constituents in the Dales and the British-Asian kids in Bradford have in common, and the answer is cricket. If cricket can produce England teams in which every kid can see themselves, the impact reaches far beyond the boundary. As I write in @thetimes today, we must all be on the same side, cheering for the same team. We cannot allow race to be reintroduced into our politics. We cannot allow Briton to be set against Briton.
1,805
1,211
451
10,794
3,351,379