
ALT Fresh excavations at Gharapuri are uncovering evidence of a thriving maritime civilisation dating to around 500 AD, with the potential to reshape understanding of India's role in the Indian Ocean trade, centuries before the Portuguese arrived. Instead of placing these discoveries at the centre of public discourse, ASI Mumbai Circle continues to focus on the introduction of audio guide tours at heritage sites. Digital accessibility certainly matters but archaeological discoveries that redefine civilisational history matter even more. There is another question that deserves attention. Why does one of India's greatest archaeological landscapes continue to be publicly identified by the colonial name 'Elephanta' instead of its historic identity as 'Gharapuri'? Heritage deserves technology. But, more importantly, heritage deserves historical honesty, writes Gajanan Khergamker.

ALT For nearly two decades, DraftCraft International argued that a footpath is not an urban amenity but constitutional infrastructure. On June 19, 2026, the Supreme Court agreed. In a landmark judgment, the Court held that every citizen enjoys a fundamental Right To Walk on a demarcated footpath, making public authorities legally accountable for constructing, maintaining and protecting pedestrian infrastructure. The ruling transforms years of documentation on broken pavements, illegal speedbreakers, encroachments and inaccessible public spaces into evidence capable of enforcing constitutional rights. Read the report by Gajanan Khergamker.




















