You’re the same old fucking idiot—it returns 0 after you pay for the DEX. @Element69420
We refuse to use Pump; you could launch on platforms like Bonk or Stonk instead! If it’s on Pump, no one will buy it! We have no interest in the likes of Alon or any of the other trashy "influencer" narratives associated with Pump.
@jeetassassin @lynk0x @notdecu The KOLs who are always "walking the red carpet" are nothing but bitches.
1. The market should raise the threshold for developers to issue tokens! A security deposit of $1,000 should be required. 2. A system should be established to limit each person to using only one wallet and to enforce real-name verification.
@Pumpfun This is exactly what you should be doing! A true community DAO.
This is just an idea of mine—it might not be feasible yet! If anyone manages to make it happen, feel free to send a payment to my wallet. 5CCTB3X2P7SdxrqydxMb3EJHwqyZAS3nu126R2o5oBMN
Manual: During the voting window, the project owners delete their socials (a classic rug pull sign) or the platform's security team detects hidden malicious code/mint permissions in the metadata. The platform's master signer immediately forces an emergency refund.
Dual-Track Refund Triggers (Automatic + Manual):Automatic: The voting timer expires, and "Yes" votes do not meet the consensus threshold (e.g., less than 51%).
Neither the platform nor the project owners can touch these funds until the final vote determines whether to Release or Refund the capital.
• On-Chain Timelock Escrow (Proof of Innocence): When the 5-minute deduction happens, all collected SOL is routed directly into a specially designed Solana On-Chain Timelock Escrow Contract.
• To prevent project owners from buying out their own supply to force a "Pass" vote, the platform enforces a maximum voting cap per single address (e.g., max 10% weight).
Capital-Weighted Voting with Anti-Sybil Caps: Voting weight is tied to the amount of SOL spent (more allocation = more voting power).







