Bringing you my own news in the football transfer market, with some additional information from reputable sources. ⚽️ Turn ON notifications.

Joined June 2021
Transfer Dan retweeted
🚨| Michael Carrick, it’s over! #mufc
35
114
6
1,317
51,937
Transfer Dan retweeted
🚨| Manchester United have been in contact with TWO potential managerial candidates in last 36 hours. #mufc
36
62
8
1,081
32,926
Transfer Dan retweeted
Consensus is Michael Carrick will make it to Sunday. Work is being done in the background to find a replacement for when/if Carrick is sacked. #mufc
They’re deliberating whether to give him the Bournemouth game. ⏳⏰ #mufc
15
26
404
23,031
Transfer Dan retweeted
Sanctions must be imposed quickly. The Premier League cannot have Manchester City as their champions in a season where they have been found guilty of 114 charges. It’s just simply can’t happen.
32
128
2
1,562
28,480
Transfer Dan retweeted
Which would still be a breach of the rules because they claimed it was from commercial sponsors *Long + tedious thread incoming about how far Abu Dhabi can be separated from its state companies
Man City will claim sponsorship cash was paid by government — not owners. This, sources say, will be the basis of their appeal, even though the evidence has already been rejected by the commission. A new panel will, of course, be appointed for appeal. thetimes.com/article/975bbd7…
47
134
11
760
223,348
Transfer Dan retweeted
Are you saying that the IC which comprises of KC’s and a top accountant don’t know the law? Etihad were not on trial, MCFC were, and Peter Baumgartner the Etihad CCO is all over those emails discussing the sham sponsorship payments with Simon Pearce and Andrew Widdowson. Pretty sure that they don’t need to give evidence to further implicate themselves 🤣
You have a Commission making findings that directly implicate #ManCity’s principal sponsor - yet Etihad says it was NEVER contacted, NEVER represented and NEVER given a right of reply. Then those findings are reached on a “more likely than not” standard of proof - not “beyond reasonable doubt”. The @PremierLeague now has serious questions to answer about the fairness of this process.
5
21
1
201
25,891