Replying to @ericjackson
Probably not. @SpaceX has govt contracts and with this scandal he'll be radioactive for a bit in that world. While @elonmusk has said they are soon only going to be 5% of business that is still a lot.
The bigger question is :
Why did you remove $SRXH from your bio?
2
228
Replying to @redbaronpizza
You also publicly support your employees. Which is a big deal these days.
2
8
Replying to @ewarren
This is peak "people don't understand the law so I can tell a half-truth to make an argument that doesn't exist"
The law passed because of the 10 day rule. If Trump wanted to block it he could have vetoed it. He wanted it to be law, just without his fingerprints on it.
1
6
He should go a step further and put it on a full page ad, Front Page, in both of the daily news papers in DC on the day that the new Congress is sworn in.
@washingtonpost
@WashTimes
There should also be something about running for Congress in there.
Exactly π
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesnβt want. Just say the word!
Replying to @JesseCohenInv @grok
Day 1: Democrats win and people think they will end the Iran war brining down oil and lowering costs of goods.
Day 2: Democrats started telling people their plans which made investors worry about over regulation and increased taxation they have planned.
1
2
37
This is going to be a very interesting year.
A lot of the people that said to vote no said that there would be a group working on prop tax relief next year and that it would be better than Amdt 3.
Now they have to submit that new potential proposal to voters.
2
44
Well done @redbaronpizza
1
15
Replying to @SecVetAffairs
If this is true then why do we have to wait years to get our own records with no way to get an update on the process?
There should also be rate bonuses that allow for lower rates in fields that the nation needs. Right now we need pilots and ATCs really bad so why not make student loans at 0.5%?
1
11
Replying to @realannapaulina @POTUS
Yes because the government shouldn't profit from student loans. However I also think it should be set to annual compounding instead of daily, weekly, monthly. ALSO the changes should be retroactive for all active loans.
Replying to @SenSanders
It is the same as if a regular person did stuff in your account. If you intentionally give them access and they drain your funds then that is on you. If you are hacked then the bank needs to increase security.
1
12
Replying to @ericjackson @KJones2112Jesus
Under the share re-purchase agreement from July $SRXH can spend up to $20 million to buy the lesser of 50% of shares outstanding or up to 10 million shares.
Why not max that out now since it was already approved?
Replying to @HouseDemocrats
Do they control cloture?
There have been 290 cloture motions in the Senate in less than 2 years. Which is more than half of the number in all 8 years of Obama.
So you are actively blocking legislation and then blaming the other guys for not getting things done.
Replying to @CarlosGSmith @SOSFLNOON3
I am fine with a tax shift. I'm okay with the amount I pay in taxes. But I want to someday actually own my home and not effectively rent it from the government, who can raise my rent at anytime based on something that I cannot control
1
8







