Distributing trust. #Ethereum Yazdıklarım yatırım tavsiyesi içermez.
Earth
Joined April 2017
- Tweets35.4K
- Following214
- Followers146K
- Likes18.6K
Yolu açık olsun, kötü bir adam kesinlikle değildi. Starknet'e çok şey kattı. Çok şey de götürdü.
Airdrop zamanında herkes bir günah keçisi arıyordu, paratoner gibi her linci yanlış bir ifadeden dolayı üzerine çekti. Bunun söyledikleri sanki Starknet'in ağzından çıkmış gibi tüm projeye faturalandı.
Aynen Abdel gibi ben de Starknet'in vizyoner ve müthiş bilgili ekibi sayesinde bu projeyi çok sevdim/seviyorum.
Ama maalesef, ekosistem yönetimi doğru olmadı. Adalet hiçbir zaman yoktu. Bu proje üzerinde emek veren insanların yaptıkları görmezden gelindi.
Umarım bu düzelir, kim ne derse desin, başarı olur veya olmaz; StarkWare ve Starknet kriptoya çok şey kattı. Katmaya devam ediyor.
Projeyi büyütmek isteyenlere tavsiyem neutrality ilkesini benimsemeleri olur.
Yolu açık olsun.
Some personal news: after all those incredible years, I'm leaving StarkWare.
Joining StarkWare was the best professional decision I've ever made. It all started with @ukolodny, who convinced me with a single sentence that showed he understood exactly how I could have the biggest impact. What followed was the most epic, transformative and inspiring chapter of my 15+ year career. That's why it's really a difficult moment for me to leave, with such a deep emotional attachment to the people, to the project.
The people at StarkWare are out of this world. It's very easy to be the dumbest person in the room there, and honestly it's the best thing that can happen to you.
A few things I'll carry with me forever:
- The Exploration Team, a bold bet that @avihu28 and Uri trusted me with. We started many open-source projects that helped shape the Starknet ecosystem, showcase cool stuff that could be built with our tech, and some even became companies with their own journeys.
- The Starknet developer ecosystem, the fastest growing in the whole crypto industry two years in a row. But it was never about vanity metrics. It has a soul: we built alongside people, supported them, and watched them grow. And it was amazing to collaborate with such a great community of passionate people.
- The privilege of being at the forefront of StarkWare's bets on Bitcoin, privacy, freedom tech and AI.
So why leave now? Over the past year, AI safety took over my mind. I'm convinced it's one of the most important challenges humanity has ever faced (very likely the biggest imo), and that math, cryptography among other things have a big role to play in it. And also that we need much more people and resources to work on it. The call to make my humble contribution became too strong to ignore, also as a duty to my children and the world we leave them.
@EliBenSasson, it was an honor to ride with you. I believe the true impact of STARKs and verifiable computation is yet to be seen, for blockchains and far beyond. As you told me, our paths will likely cross again, I strongly believe it. There are so many people from StarkWare I would like to thank and name (luckily many of them are to busy shipping they don't even have an X account 😂)...
@bbrandtom my brother I love you (don't worry I will nurture the flame).
gigachad brains like @LiorGoldberg2 @VolokhIlia
You all know that I think the world of you, that working with you was such a pleasure, we had so many epic intense moments together.
I remain extremely bullish on Starknet and @StarkWare. The tech is years ahead, the StarkWare team is out of this world. The Starknet Foundation is full of great talented people too, and I have full confidence in @strjd87 ability to spearhead the vision and lead his team (full of great folks like @thedamooo @henrlihenrli @franklyteddy @omarespejel and others) towards success!
The Starknet ecosystem is still strong, and I am amazed to see friends like @MentorNotPseudo still on the frontline and shipping and battling constantly to help Starknet moving forward. I have great respect for the builders and I wish them all the best and great successes.
To the StarkWare team and the Starknet community: thank you for the trust, the energy and the friendships. If there's one team that can make StarkWare and @Starknet incredibly successful, it's this one. I'll be cheering from the front row.
Forever grateful ❤️
tobbykitty.eth retweeted
ETH supply is up about 1% since the Merge.
In the same time period:
> solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 supply grew 66%, from 354M to about 589M.
> ripple:native supply grew 27%, from 49.83B to about 63.1B.
> cardano:native supply grew about 10%, from 34.18B to about 37.5B to 38B.
> bitcoin:native supply grew 4.96%, from 19.15M to about 20.10M.
> ethereum:native supply grew 1.0%, from 120.52M to about 121.7M.
Hesabı dışarıya taşı, kanıtla getir zincire sok mantığını ilk ortaya atan eşşek @MinaProtocol'dü.
2020 olması lazım; Kimchi'den önce "Turshi" isimli bir Cairo yürütücüsü denenmişti Mina'da. StarkWare'nin ilk prototiplerinden.
Ne mesai harcamıştım ya... yeminle.
Ultimately, precompiles and EVM are both the wrong place to put most cryptography support into Ethereum. The reason is that precompiles and EVM both operate on data that has to be included into the ethereum chain somehow, which realistically means included in a block as calldata. That space is limited - even with PeerDAS and blocks-in-blobs, there's a practical cap of ~8 MB/s before it starts getting uncomfortable.
Remember: it's not a blockchain. It's a cryptographic world computer. Any data/computation that does not need to be in the "main thread" of data/execution should not be put into the main thread.
Instead, the correct solution is... EIP-8288 maximalism.
If you have any heavy computation that's self-contained, compute it and STARK it client-side (this is quickly getting faster and faster, even on phones), and push the STARK through the EIP-8288 recursive aggregation mechanism. The chain sees the fact that the computation was done and what the result is; it never needs to see the actual data and computation.
This way everyone can use whatever cryptography they want, the Ethereum chain can be lean, and we never need to add more precompiles again.
Bizim bölümün düştüğü duruma bak..
İdealist bir manyağım, ben bile bittim artık. Spor Hekimliği devamke.
Cerrahi merrahi yazmayın hayat var hayat..
Ledger özellikle Türkiyede çok meşhur bir cüzdandı.
Çok reklam verdiler, tabi bizimkileri suçlayamayız nereden bilsinler..
Birkaç satıcıdan alınan Ledgerlarda casus çipler çıktı.
Ben ezelden beridir Trezorcuyum, hep Trezor önerdim size. Bu haber yalan.
(Size çekiliş ile gönderdiğim Trezorları direkt fabrikadan göndertmiştim.)
🚨: @Trezor Joins Hack
It’s has officially extended beyond @Ledger with @Trezor wallet devices also being found tampered.
Get off @Trezor now!!!!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The recent tampering incident involves only Ledger devices sold via reseller CryptoBilis; Trezor states there are no confirmed cases of tampered Trezor devices from CryptoBilis or other resellers.
x.com/Trezor/status/…
x.com/Trezor/status/…
trezor.io/support/troubl…
beincrypto.com/is-any-hardwar…
Bu yorumu herkes değerlendirmiş, paraları harcama yapmayan bir cüzdana geçirmek güvendeyiz o zaman diye düşünüyor.
Ama konu tam olarak öyle değil.
Ethereum'da başka hiçbir blokzincirde olmayan devasa bir validator sayısı mevcut. Yaklaşık 840 bin tane validator aralarında 12 saniyede anlaşıp sisteme blok ekliyor.
Bu devasa karmaşıklığı diğer blokzincirlerin yap(a)mamasının sebeplerinden biri de BLS adı verilen imzalama modelleri.
BLS binlerce imzayı toplayıp tek imzada birleştirmeye yarayan bir teknoloji.
Ve bunu sağlayan da yine ECC.
Bunlar da açıkçası Quantum/AI assisted bir atakta cortlamaya müsait.
Yani ben parayı kaçırdım moruk diye bir olay yok, Quantum direkt konsensusu kırıyor.
leanXMSS gibi, Falcon512 gibi ya da direkt HASH tabanlı STARK gibi sistemlere ihtiyaç var.
İvme kazanıp bu işi bitirmek lazım. Elimizde sadece kriptografik kanıtlar kalacak.
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
Hot take, CT:
Starknet outclasses Zcash in almost every technical dimension.
The tech isn't even close. The only thing keeping this a debate is your bags.
Regards.
$STRK fiyatı 3 Dolarlardan düşmüş, bu pumplar hiçbir şey.
Oralara gelir mi, ben inanıyorum geleceğine ama ne umrumda, ne de takip ediyorum.
Cüzdanımın şifresini unuttum.
$SSTR için de tertemiz memecoin, çünkü kimsenin tek elinde değil. Üç dört kişi alsa şu an 20x yapar. Likidite az. Zamanında ben oluşturdum doğru hiç üç kağıt çevirmedim her şey şeffaf yaşandı.
Ben kriptodan çok uzak kaldım. Çünkü hastanede yaşıyorum. Vaktim yok artık. Ne olacaksa olsun kafasındayım.
Fibrous, son bir yılda 200 üzeri proie kepenk kapattı. Biraz nefes aldırın çocuklara.
Suçlu seçmekten vazgeçin. Kimsenin, hele benim, kimsenin cebinde gözüm mözüm yok.
Genel cevap.
Ben bu zamana kadar hep doğru bildiklerimi anlattım ve savundum.
İnsanların para kaybedince birilerini/beni suçlu ilan etmesi çok doğal. Çünkü belki de en çok ben para kaybettim.
Starknet için de L2'ler için de Ethereum için de fikrim hiç değişmedi.
Ben 2016'dan beri Quantum hikayesini duyuyorum.
Ama bu sefer siktir edin şu an tehdit değildir diyemiyorum. Gelişmeler tahmin edilenden çok daha hızlı ilerliyor çünkü.
Ciddiye almakta fayda var. En geç 2-3 yıla adaptasyon şart.
Açıkçası Starknet için de Ethereum için de iyi bir haber.
İlk olarak Starknet L2 savaşını kaybetti. Aktivite yok. Olmuyor. Ne yapsalar tutturamadılar, Bitcoin L2si olayım, gizli olayım öyle böyle derken kendilerini konumlandıracak bir şeyleri kalmadı. İyice Ethereum topluluğunu irrite ettiler.
Öte yandan Ethereum Foundation ile anlaşamadıkları bir realiteydi. Olmadı. Bazı çiçekler bazı topraklarda açmıyor. Ethereum üzerinde çok daha sempatik ve aktif L2'ler zaten var.
Öte yandan Starknet için de iyi oldu. Post-Quantum diyemiyorlar, sözleşmeler Ethereum'da olduğundan Quantum Dirençli değiller.
STRK için use case bulmakta çok zorlandılar, L1 olunca daha iyi olur.
Açıkçası Zcash'in yakaladığı hareketi Starknet için yakalamak istiyorlar.
Hayırlısı olsun ben her iki taraf için de pozitif veya negatif olarak değerlendirmedim.
tobbykitty.eth retweeted
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
Müthiş
Ethereum scaling is here
terencechain.com/writing/ver…
