Exposing intersexphobia from trans activists - DM your screenshots and/or post links. Interfakers, PretenDSDers, and misinformation from gender idealogues.

Posts on ๐•
Joined October 2023
There's two sides to the narrative going on in the background. My side, and the other side. In the middle is the truth. However, I have the receipts! A certain arrogant dumbass thinks demanding me to do what he orders, is some sort of flex he can wield, as if he has power.
1
2
384
I dare you to read this and respond, @bice_mx you lying blocking coward!
Replying to @bice_mx
@bice_mx is a blocking coward. No lies were made by me. And I'll be damned if on today, of all days, when awareness of the medical needs, and the human rights of intersex people, is observed, some mouthy idjit is going to lie, and think the lies won't be addressed.
1
1
26
Intersex is an outdated misnomer for a subset of DSDs. All Intersex conditions are DSDs. Not all DSDs are intersex. Still used by advocacy/activists groups and for personal use by diagnosed individuals. You've been called out on the rest of your claim. xitter.cf/HatzKatzn/status/21067โ€ฆ
Youโ€™re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
1
2
61
Not a single male has ever developed ovaries (pl). Trans men are females, that's why they have ovaries. It's utterly amazing how absolutely stupid you are. I seriously question where you get your shit.
Youโ€™re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
1
2
88
Biology says intersex are one of the two anisogamous sexes due to the presence of dimorphic gametes. The rest of your post is activist lying nonsense. Non consensual surgeries went down after the 2006 Consensus. In the US, everything came to a halt after MC vs Aaranson in 2013
Youโ€™re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
1
1
53
ICD-11 was published in 2018. It is not universally used yet, so the prior edition, ICD-10, is still widely used. NORD was founded in 1983, GARD in 1997, Orphanet in 2002. They are all repositories for rare conditions, such as DSDs. DSD-I is a database founded in 2006.
i am interested in having a conversation with you; science is always updating and making new discoveries every day, so why can't scientists do more research on how hormones effect sexual organs? and also, when was "CD-10, ICD-11, NORD, GARD, Orphanet and DSD-I," released??
1
3
19
That's 100% false. The experts are the clinicians and developmental biologists You need to fact check yourself. I already gave the sources; NORD, GARD, Orphanet, DSD-I, ICD-10 and ICD-11. Time to put up or shut up. Provide your expert sources. I'll wait...
any condition that effects primary or secondary sex characteristics in development is deemed intersex by experts even if not medically recognized as such please fact check yourself .
1
1
2
76
Actually, it's not. You are not born with PMOS, OR hyperestrogenism. Stop being a condescending POS enabling a liar. Glad we got that straightened out.
Youโ€™re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
1
57
You're repeating the cult mantra. The rights that the LGB fought for, involved absolutely no trans black women. You need to grow up or get out. You have the same rights as everyone one else. LGB fought with zero trans people, to have those same rights, not special rights.
There is no LGB without the T. Our rights were fought for by trans black women. Grow up or get out
4
159
This has been happening to me for weeks on my main account. There's no recourse whatsoever. So much for this being a "free speech" platform. I had my account wrongly suspended with no case # previously. Hey @Safety @elonmusk this is a great way to drive away users this platform
2
5
203
1st ever pinned post. And my last, because it's staying there. It'll be far more entertaining than your crappy vanity press books. There will be reposts of content from others who have called you out for the abusive POS you are. I have receipts galore, so this will be a work in
1
55
Still lying, the gonads are fully developed. Some have been father's. Either naturally or with assisted technology. She's intentionally deceitful and manipulative. The cancer risk is in the CAIS women, who do have underdeveloped testes. Not the 5ARD males. She's gaslighting you.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
138
And Femme continues to lie. There's no vagins. And there is no rudimentary testicular tissue, and 5ARD males have not been known to have cancer. I've also said they can live however they want, but they are physiological males who cannot compete with women.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
2
190
It's a father - daughter bonding time. They are conversing and sharing affection with each other. Healthy parental affectionate relationships with children, is normal. There is nothing creepy about this type of physical closeness between a father and his young daughter.
This quoted post is unavailable.
221