Hey, we lost the technology to get back to the moon too. If I can buy that...
Replying to @Erdos620773 @TransSplendor
Evidence:
Also look at Leah’s response below the shared tweet
“I can’t do a public discussion with Candace because I no longer have the podcast software on my laptop”
😂😂😂
Idk maybe download it real quick? Or use anything
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
I am caller 15 this morning leaving a message asking when Brian Cole Jr is going to be released….
White House.
202-456-1414
@FreeBrianCole
This tweet had a big affect on my take. The 'confirmation bias' claim was wtf, the evasiveness on the Thiel point was wtf(Leah led with 'Thiel name drop censoring' in her Pt2 initial posting yet in this DM she says "I never said he was protecting Thiel" UHHHH YES YOU DID - that's the inevitable implication from asserting you were kept from two names and Thiel is one of em..), this is where I started feeling like I jumped the gun thinking Leah had the sauce.
This doesn't reverse any Shawn takes of mine(he's sus overload), but at least Candace's behaviour makes sense to me.
When Leah's first reaction was "You too[Travis]?" when Travis made a point that Leah posts on a substack(Andreessen Horowitz owned). "You too" is a victim + conform pressure posture, that's so Raven(ex-intel) whereas I never see Candace lead with sympathy requests, she wants to fight battles herself on evidence not mob emotion. This is the main reason I can't stand Shawn Ryan: Sympathy manipulation "poor me, muh demons, oh but im heavily invested in demon inc". 2 ex intels one cup(of sympathy)
I get that punching down can be a thing and Candace vs Leah seems a mismatch but WHO THE FUCK CARES, I've called out Alex Jones for a year.. I'm much smaller than Leah and I'd walk into AJN studios like a damn baller if he wanted the smoke(Even better if AJ wanted on #MatrixWorldReport). This is BS, Leah is a fucking high level poker player completely unused to pressure?- to invoke victimhood is a massive red flag for me.
The ones telling the truth usually want a live venue:
"All of this said, I would be happy to join Leah on her own podcast to explain to her more thoroughly why her substack research is tremendously flawed and at points, wholly dishonest. Truth doesn’t fear introspection and as always, I have nothing to hide." - Candace
Replying to @BEmpress1984
Not only did it never happen, but when I asked Leah for information to verify that claim specifically, that she was asked not to name Peter Thiel, she accused me of focusing in on Peter Thiel out of “confirmation bias”.
I’m not sure she knows what confirmation bias means.
She then did a 3am X space SEVERELY misrepresenting our private DM conversation, because she was upset I told her there were obvious errors in her glacier app substack. She called me an ai bot and an idiot for trying to explain to her that some of the stuff she is suggesting is conspiracy is literal federal law compliance.
I normally never share private DMs, but since she completely misrepresented what I said to her privately and then publicly called me a shill, I will share the below. I have since given her my explicit permission to drop the entirety of our conversation because I have nothing to hide. I had dinner with Shawn Ryan once— meeting him ahead of our interview. Keep in mind my interview where we discussed Peter Thiel was dropped the very same week she’s claiming she was not allowed to utter his name.
So what actually happened? My honest take is that if anyone questions Leah’s credentials or research she flies off the handle and tries to take them down with shoddy AI research presented as a deep dive.
From having looked into matter (by contacting a person who Leah told me would back up her claims and was present) I am confident stating that she misrepresented what happened.
It seems that after receiving producer notes, Shawn genuinely thought her research was dogshit. The producer then went and tried to politely and awkwardly see if he could find something of more interest for her to talk about beyond what anyone could easily find on google. In doing this, Leah genuinely believed that she was being censored because her research was SO controversial. It was the exact opposite.
What then transpired was effectively a really bad and awkward first date. Shawn was upset she was booked at all and that no one had done their due diligence enough to have prevented the occurrence of seating someone before him who claimed to be an economist with backgrounds in finance and accounting, but didn’t know what the petrodollar was.
A decision was made to shelve the interview. Shawn then made (in my opinion) a bad decision to refer to the shelved interview on another podcast—because even though the public did not to whom he was referring to, Leah did and she got angry. Out of that anger, she concocted a narrative, (again with publicly available information on LinkedIn), that she was actually censored because he was protecting his assets with Peter Thiel and Andreeson Horowitz, names that she knew would easily trigger the conspiracy crowd into believing the deep state was after her research.
Next came her targeting the glacier app— with more pithy, scraped research meant to make people think Shawn was colluding with the NSA and the Mossad to steal their data. Again, an easy sell with the conspiracy crowd, especially given Shawn’s background with the CIA.
All of this said, I would be happy to join Leah on her own podcast to explain to her more thoroughly why her substack research is tremendously flawed and at points, wholly dishonest. Truth doesn’t fear introspection and as always, I have nothing to hide.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
BC Selections
Red Liberals lost.
Blue Liberals installed
Same flotsam.
Different pile.
ofc I agree that Candace favourites get more $ for supporting Candace, cuz Candace is Oprah level(I hereby demand Candace never RT me). That should rightly be considered when weighing opinion. That said, are there still demonstrable facts Mel could use? Ofc. Should Candace have no one advocate for her lest the "you're just doing this for money" be invoked?
But the inverse also works. a feud with Candace is also lucrative I'd imagine. Not just independent coffee buys. DoD payments and Parscale ops have 100s of millions to spend on "those who can upset Candace or get Candace to say X, regarding Y, for lawfare."
She's constantly being whispered about people who she should suspect and if one of them is Leah, and then her and Shawn get into it, I can see how this all played out the way it did. Candace also has her own mind and feels something doesn't look right with Leah's work - no whisper campaign, she just doesn't buy it.
The alternative isn't really convincing to me atm: Candace did all this to, at the final stage, feed everyone to Palantir cuz it wasn't about Charlie, it was about that Glacier $? And Leah stumbled onto their grift but only felt like mentioning it when Shawn was a dick to her? I agree Shawn's investments are autistic and contradict his victim narrative about being a 'victim' of the deepstate - but the fact Candace defended him might be a link to a friend fag rather than "Our investment portfolio's are in danger and Peter Thiel is calling me non-stop!!"
The key to me is Candace wants to debate Leah. The truth dont hide, and if you want me to pick sides between ex-Intel and Candace, get real. I'd pick ANY CKMRE big dawg over ex-Intel be that Stew, Baron, Diligent etc.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
🚨 I found in the Epstein files an email that allegedly links Jared Kushner to the murder of a Saudi journalist.
Is this why billions are flowing into his account from MBS? Let’s dig in 🤔🔍
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
La Cour suprême a officiellement entériné un régime de détermination des peines dans lequel la sanction dépend de la race.
Dans la récente affaire Cope, la Cour suprême a maintenu une peine réduite pour un contrevenant autochtone qui a brutalement agressé sa conjointe.
Le juge au procès a prononcé cinq ans. Un cercle de détermination de la peine, une pratique autochtone de résolution de conflits, a recommandé trois ans.
La Cour suprême a dit que trois ans était la bonne réponse, en reprochant au juge de ne pas avoir accordé assez de poids aux « traditions juridiques autochtones ».
Il n’existe pas de « droit autochtone ». Et les traditions autochtones ne devraient pas primer sur le droit canadien tel qu’écrit par le Parlement.
Le résultat?
Un contrevenant obtient un rabais, non pas à cause des faits de son crime, mais à cause de son origine.
Ce n’est pas de la justice. C’est de la comptabilité raciale déguisée en réconciliation.
Ne vous y trompez pas : l’égalité devant la loi, un principe fondamental de la civilisation occidentale, ne s’applique plus au Canada.
La Cour suprême l’a remplacée par un système où la justice est administrée selon l’appartenance à un groupe, l’ascendance et les griefs historiques.
Et ça ne s’arrête pas aux contrevenants autochtones.
La même logique est maintenant étendue à d’autres groupes au moyen des évaluations de l’impact de la race et de la culture.
Le principe est toujours le même : certains Canadiens sont traités comme des membres de groupes ayant des griefs historiques, tandis que d’autres sont traités comme des individus responsables de leurs actes.
Le Parti populaire croit en UNE SEULE NORME DE JUSTICE POUR TOUS LES CANADIENS. Vous commettez le crime, vous purgez la peine. Point final.
Nous sommes le seul parti fédéral prêt à dire ce que les libéraux et les faux conservateurs ne diront pas : les cours doivent traiter chaque victime et chaque contrevenant également devant la loi.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
Never take yourself too seriously. People can tell. Have faith in yourself. Be sincere. But remember, you are insignificant in the totality of the universe.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
I never let go of the Egyptian planes. Always knew they were a piece of the Charlie Kirk assasination. They completely overreacted when I mentioned them and Erika made such an awkward joke about them at AmFest when she should have been naturally concerned about them. Plus Joe Kent was blocked from looking into them.
Never once doubted they were/are a major piece of the puzzle.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
I’m sure this information about Jared Kushner is not that big of a deal.
Trans(Alex Cargill #PPC Candidate Kings-Hants) retweeted
Replying to @paramounttactcl @TransSplendor
You’re trying to gain relevance off of his irrelevance? 🙄
Your word choices tell me you’re miserable, projecting onto someone that makes you feel even more insecure? Is it his confidence that rubs you, or his intelligence & his ability to communicate?
This is as good a take as any. I don't know if Leah "bombed" the interview, I thought Shawn MOAB'd the interview pretty well himself. but the rest I can see as likely.
Replying to @TransSplendor
Simple Timeline
-Leah bombed the interview
-Shawn talks shit
-Leah sees it and starts opp research
-Investments, military, big names
-create a spin and launch it
-Baron gave analysis
-Candace defended Shawn's character
-the mob pounces, demands conformity
Dude, it's getting sad, but also funny.. So please keep going.
The reason im "Not running" right now is there hasn't been an election called. When that happens, I get 150 signatures like last time and - wait for it - RUN.
Again @TransSplendor lies. There is nowhere online showing he is currently running for office and he hasn’t run for office since 2025. Why is the donation button still up, Alex?
Not at all... But again, thanks for your effort - tells me a bunch. Even if you managed to somehow get PPC money, we'd have to document exactly who it was from or get cooked by Elections Canada.
So your theory implies I did all this (having an online opinion that resonated with Americans) in order to get JUST ONE of em to donate to my political party cuz im... afraid(?) That I might win a seat and I need to sabotage myself with foreign donations?
You guys are doing good!
What a great reveal from Josh.
Those without arguments need to attack the messenger's motives.
Spoiler, he got everything wrong:
- Im still a PPC candidate. IT'S 👏 LITERALLY👏IN👏MY 👏BIO. When im not, i'll change my bio.
- Americans arent allowed to donate to me/PPC.
- Even if they were, your cobbled smear implies i was hoping AMERICANS would do a deep dive on my PPC affiliation to chose try to donate. Which would be illegal and tank my campaign?
- I dont even ask my constituents for donations which aggravates my PPC HQ peeps.
This is the projection reveal. There's always a cost to having your opinions valued. Im super stoked this is the attack angle they've settled on.
We see you and we love you, "Josh".
Replying to @TransSplendor
@TransSplendor why do you still have a donation link on the PPC website when you are no longer a candidate? Another lazy foreign grifter trying to steal money from U.S. citizens.
You want answers, Gary fine:
- youre a hobbit.
- the reason no one likes you is youre a transparent grifter whose brain worked one day and the next believed Charlie to have a magic neck.
- your face plants have acted as major breaks in the Mitch Snow case(proving he was where he said he was).
No one has "answers" on this drama, Gary's just mad that in a mercurial side-taking chaos op, im advocating a wait and see approach.
Whenever he pipes up I know im doing good things on X.
I enjoy most drama because I know it's inevitable.
They have too much at stake. And too much money, desperation, immediate goals threatened by awakenings.
You're never going to be left alone. If they dont have your hearts and 'minds' they're fuct.
They also win with a tie (Kumbaya fags giving up and going home cuz 'muh drama') so why wouldn't they inject Wilson ops endlessly.
This is the most harmless aspect of the new life you have to deal with being awake and looking for truth. If you lose the 5th gen warfare of ideas, you'll miss the days when you had even a chance to weigh in, none the less tap out.































