steven wilkinson retweeted
Missing some context here.
There was, in fact, a political party in Israel that long embraced the possibility of a Palestinian state. That was the Labor Party. But then the second intifada happened, the Palestinian Authority abandoned any pretense of democracy, and Hamas was elected in Gaza, killed off the opposition — and then, well, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, murdering more than 1,200.
Had the Palestinians, at any step along the way, accepted the Jewish state, and embraced self-rule, they would, no doubt, be in a very different place today. They might even have a state.
But because Palestinians can’t push past their hatred of Israel, because so many of their “supporters” insist on viewing them as toddlers and encourage that hatred (financially and otherwise), they remain confined to a quasi-permanent liminality. Which is awful for Palestinians but very useful for those who wish to use them as a cudgel with which to bludgeon Israel.
NEW: The group behind Cornel West's 2024 ballot push was wholly funded through Elon Musk's dark money network, according to Sludge's review of tax documents. readsludge.com/2026/10/26/mu…
steven wilkinson retweeted
Finally, members of Congress seem to grasp that the President of the USA needs to be treated like a Russian agent, who is trying to use the power of the US government to protect Vladimir Putin as part of a criminal enterprise. That’s where we are.
steven wilkinson retweeted
🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: The US Department of Justice has filed its Memorandum in Support of Andrew Tate’s extradition to the UK.
The DOJ argues that the UK’s submission establishes probable cause that Andrew Tate committed the 39 charged offenses being considered for extradition.
The DOJ also emphasizes that the allegations are not based solely on victims’ statements, citing substantial independent corroborating evidence, including communications, witness accounts, travel records, and banking records.
steven wilkinson retweeted
Israel Election Explainer:
Winning the most seats doesn't mean winning the election. And tonight's exit polls show us exactly why.
Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud is projected to be the largest party in the Knesset. But when you add up the seats won by parties that are willing to govern together, the picture gets much more complicated.
Here's the breakdown (61 seats is the magic number to form a government):
➡️ Netanyahu's bloc: ~50 seats. These are parties generally aligned with Netanyahu and considered potential partners in his government.
➡️ The anti-Netanyahu bloc: ~53 seats. These are parties opposed to another Netanyahu government, although they don't necessarily agree on who should lead the country or what policies to pursue.
➡️ Arab-led parties (take that "apartheid"): 17 seats. These parties also oppose Netanyahu but are counted separately because they are not part of the main Zionist opposition bloc.
Remember, 61 seats are needed to command a majority in Israel's 120-seat parliament.
Neither of the two main blocs has enough seats to govern on its own. So what happens next?
Once the official results are in, Israel's president consults with the elected parties and decides which member of parliament has the best chance of forming a government. That person gets the first opportunity to assemble a coalition.
Netanyahu may get the first chance because Likud is projected to be the largest party, but that is not automatic. The president must consider who can actually assemble a majority.
Then come the negotiations. Party leaders will bargain over who joins the government, what policies it pursues, and who gets which cabinet positions.
And here's the twist: it's entirely possible that neither side will succeed and Israelis will hold another election.
Thoughts and prayers with the Green Party councillor who was hoping for an outright Netanyahu win.
As we know, pro-Palestinian attack the left, not the right. The reason: they can't morally shame the eight into submission. Fascinating and entirely plausible.
Israel BREAKING:
It appears that Netanyahu’s call to arms on election day got voters out to vote for his Likud party at the expense of his coalition partners on the harder right. He’s increased his party’s share - but cannibalised his own bloc for power
steven wilkinson retweeted
#Winchester:
Cllr Malcolm Wallace, a Green councillor for Central Meon Valley, has left the party to sit as an Independent.
steven wilkinson retweeted
South Staffordshire:
Cllrs Gary Burnett and Fiona Hopkins, both Green councillors for Bilbrook, have left the party to sit as Independents.
There is no longer a Green representation on S. Staffs council.
steven wilkinson retweeted
It was an honor to be a part of this video by the brilliant @cenkuygur for @AbdulElSayed . It is so important to go out and vote! #makeamericadeerborn
steven wilkinson retweeted
Jews in the diaspora seem to think a change in Israel’s government will be good for them — for us. But it doesn’t matter. The thing is, Israelis and Jews around the world aren’t targeted because of a specific government or policy. We’re targeted for the crime of being alive.
Horrible histories: the keffiyeh
Replying to @AdinHaykin1
Yes. Rebel leaders ordered all Arab men to wear the keffiyeh in 1938 to signal solidarity, invert class markers, and let fighters blend in. Noncompliance brought beatings and coercion by rebel bands. Those bands, marked by the keffiyeh, carried out attacks on Jews (hundreds killed) and Arab political rivals during the revolt.
steven wilkinson retweeted
Hamas's founding charter literally calls for killing Jews.
Not Zionists. Jews.
Don't you dare tell us not to "conflate the two."
Hamas conflates the two, and they're the ones doing the killing.
Like most Western pro-Palestinian news outlets, Double Down News has no actual interest in a resolution to the conflict between Israel and Hamas or peace in the Middle East. Continued hostilities justifies keeping the pro-Palestinian, anti-Western, far-left bandwagon going.
Israel going to the polls changes NOTHING for Palestinians.
Western media treats the election as a contest between Netanyahu’s far-right coalition and a "moderate" opposition. In reality, the alternative to Netanyahu is an alliance of generals and hardliners who have driven the exact same machinery of violence and dispossession for decades:
Gadi Eisenkot: The opposition frontrunner who formulated the Dahiya doctrine—mandating the deliberate, disproportionate destruction of civilian infrastructure. He sat in the war cabinet over Gaza and dismissed ICC war crimes investigations as "antisemitism."
Yair Lapid: The supposed centrist whose stated principle is "maximum Jews on maximum land with minimum Palestinians."
Avigdor Lieberman: Declared "there are no innocents in Gaza" while cutting off water, power, and food.
Naftali Bennett: Boasted on record, "I have killed many Arabs in my life, and there is no problem with that."
As Peter Oborne reports from the West Bank, an opposition victory might actually be far more dangerous internationally. It would provide Western allies with the diplomatic PR cover they crave to drop pressure, restore impunity, and pretend Israel is back to being a "rules-based democracy."
Meanwhile, on the ground:
State-armed settlers continue expelling Palestinian communities at gunpoint.
Demolitions across East Jerusalem accelerate unabated.
Human rights bodies document systemic, industrial torture across detention camps.
The ballot box in Tel Aviv is not a choice between occupation and peace. It is a choice between overt extremism under Netanyahu and an internationally sanitized version of the exact same apartheid state under his rivals.





























