New York let this man out of prison after he killed two children. Within two years he had killed 11 more people. This is Arthur Shawcross. In 1972 he took a plea deal for the deaths of a 10-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl. He served less than 15 years. In 1987 the parole board signed his release, and his parole officer moved him to Rochester without telling the local police. Women started disappearing from the same streets he drove every night. He even warned his girlfriend to be careful because "a bad guy" was out there. They caught him by accident. A police helicopter spotted a body frozen under a bridge, and he was standing on that bridge. In the video below he sits in a maximum security prison and talks about all of it like he's describing his weekend. He laughs, then calmly says there's a bad man inside him, behind a door, and he's trying to keep him there. Then the interviewer asks about the families of the women he killed. "I don't have any remorse, for some reason. It's not there." He got 250 years and died in prison in 2008. The prosecutor from 1972 said that if he had gotten a real murder sentence back then, those women would still be alive. Who has more blood on their hands, the man who killed them or the people who let him out?

On February 13, 2013, Reeva Steenkamp cooked dinner for her boyfriend, set the table with candles, and waited for their first Valentine's Day together. A few hours later, he fired four shots through a locked bathroom door. She was behind it. Her boyfriend was Oscar Pistorius, the "Blade Runner." Both his legs were amputated when he was a baby, and in 2012 he ran at the London Olympics against able-bodied athletes. In the video below, in his first TV interview, he tells his version of that night. He speaks quickly, like he's still inside it. He says he woke at 3 a.m. and heard a window slide in the bathroom. He thought it was a burglar. He grabbed his gun. "And at that moment, I hear the toilet door slam." At 2:08: "Before I knew it, I had fired four shots." He says he went back to the bed and reached for Reeva. She wasn't there. "At that point, I knew that I'd killed her." In court, the prosecutor asked if he fired on purpose. Watch him at 3:13. "I'm getting confused with this accidentally and not accidentally." The court first called it culpable homicide. On appeal, it became murder. He got 13 years and 5 months. At the end, he says: "At times I don't feel like I should have the right to live." A few seconds later: "I won't spend a day in jail for murdering anyone." In January 2024, he was released on parole. Reeva's mother said she still doesn't believe his story. Some people say he made a terrible mistake in the dark. Others say nobody fires four shots into a locked door by accident. Do you believe Oscar Pistorius?

😡Deputy laughed and joked after shooting and killing dog of family whose house just burned: Recording:👮‍♂️“You know what really sucks? This man is going to come home and see his house burned down and his dogs are dead. (ha-ha-ha) He’s gonna be like f*cking sheriff’s office…” ha-ha-ha! On Aug. 15, 2024, in Mossy Head, Walton County, FL, a fully involved house fire destroyed the Pylant family’s home. Firefighters reported two dogs (Bella, ~6yo pit bull, and Athena) were aggressive and blocking access while it was unknown if anyone was inside. Battalion Chief Mike Griggs directed WCSO Sgt. Kyle Hutto to shoot the dogs; Hutto shot and killed Bella (Athena survived). Bodycam audio later captured Hutto and Deputy Connor Gunn laughing and joking about the owner returning to a burned house and dead dogs. 🔴The Sheriff’s Office ruled the shooting within policy. The deputies were disciplined for the comments (not fired). Sheriff Adkinson called the language unacceptable. 🔴In 2026 the family filed a 9-count civil suit against Adkinson, Hutto, and Griggs. Lawsuit status as of late October 2026: Filed: June 12, 2026, in Walton County (Florida) Circuit Court. Plaintiffs: 🔹Michelle Pylant 🔹Rodney Pylant (the homeowners). Defendants: 🔸Sheriff Michael A. Adkinson Jr. 🔸Sgt. Kyle Hutto 🔸Battalion Chief Mike Griggs The case remains in its early procedural stage. ❓Is the 2026 lawsuit the only real accountability these guys will ever face? ❓If this happened to your dog and your house, would “they were disciplined” be enough for you?

They are traveling in 2 cars, the uhaul and a suv. Why keeping the dogs in the uhaul with the FL heat instead of having them in the other car with A/C? Definitely. Animal abuse, great outcome

امرأة امريكية تدعى ميلورا (29 عام) كانت نائمة داخل منزلها في لوس انجلوس واستيقضت على صوت غريب، نظرت من النافذه فوجدت رجل يحاول اقتحام منزلها أدركت ميلورا أن الرجل سيدخل، فهربت من نافذة الطابق الثاني إلى سطح المنزل، وأخذت هاتفها للاتصال بالشرطة واختبأت وهي مرعوبة اسفل حافة بارزة، المرعب انه لحقها للسطح وهو يبحث عنها وفي يده اداه وهنا التقطت هذه الصورة التي انتشرت عالميا وصلت الشرطة وتمكنوا بالتعاون مع رجال الاطفاء من انزالها وتم القبض على الرجل الذي يدعى كريستيان هيكس لكن هنا يبدأ الشي الغريب والمزعج: في صباح نفس اليوم اوقفته الشرطة بعد ان اقتحم فناء منزل واطلقوا سراحه وبعدها اتجه لميلورا حكم عليه بالسجن لمدة ثلاث سنوات وتم الافراج عنه وقبض عليه مرة اخرى في عام 2018 بتهم سطو وتحرش، وحُكم عليه بالحبس أقل من سنة. قبض عليه عام 2021 في تهمه خطف واغتصاب واخيرا عام 2023 تم الحكم عليه بالسجن لمدة 37 سنة كل ما حدث اخفاقات وخلل كبير في النظام و القضاء، كيف شخص خطير مثل هذا يتم اعطاءه كل هذه الفرص؟

Nope, not donating to anyone.

🚨 NEW: Joe Rogan was in shock when historical storyteller Cody Tucker revealed that Mother Teresa was actually a horrible person who kept dying patients in horrible conditions while massive donations flowed to the Vatican: TUCKER: “She's a scumbag. Mother Teresa never did anything good.” CONTEXT: In 1994, a physician named Robin Fox visited Mother Teresa's Home for the Dying in Calcutta. Fox wasn't some anonymous critic. He was the editor of The Lancet, one of the world's most prestigious medical journals. And what he described was deeply troubling. Medical care was inconsistent. Some decisions were made by nuns and volunteers without formal medical training. Basic diagnostic investigations were rarely available. And the facility did not have strong painkillers in its medication supply. Fox described a patient with a high fever who initially received paracetamol and an antibiotic before a visiting doctor suspected malaria and changed the treatment. His central objection was that patients who might have treatable conditions weren't being reliably distinguished from people who were actually dying. Think about that. Someone could arrive believing they were receiving medical care when they might have needed a proper diagnosis, referral or treatment. And this wasn't the only criticism. In 2013, three Canadian academics published a critical review of Mother Teresa's life and work in the journal Studies in Religion. They questioned her approach to caring for the sick, her political relationships and the management of the enormous donations her organization received. One of their central concerns was whether a religious belief in the spiritual value of suffering had been allowed to influence the standard of care provided to vulnerable patients. Mother Teresa believed suffering could have profound spiritual meaning. But there's a difference between helping someone find meaning in unavoidable suffering... AND FAILING TO RELIEVE SUFFERING THAT MEDICINE COULD PREVENT. There is also an important complication. During the 1990s, India had extraordinarily restrictive regulations governing access to morphine. Human Rights Watch later documented that India's medical morphine consumption collapsed by approximately 97% between 1985 and 1997. Even major hospitals struggled to obtain adequate pain medication. So the absence of strong painkillers at Mother Teresa's facilities does not, by itself, prove she deliberately withheld them because she wanted patients to suffer. And Fox acknowledged something critics often leave out: The home he visited provided cleanliness, wound care and genuine kindness to desperately poor people. The Missionaries of Charity also cared for people whom hospitals had turned away. Mother Teresa saw her mission primarily as offering dignity, love and spiritual comfort to the abandoned, rather than operating conventional hospitals. Critics have questioned the Missionaries of Charity's financial transparency for decades. But Tucker's more specific allegation that Mother Teresa funneled donated money to the Vatican rather than caring for patients has not been established by the evidence reviewed here. That distinction matters. IMPORTANT NOTES: Mother Teresa received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979. The Catholic Church canonized her as a saint in 2016. To millions of people, she remains one of the greatest symbols of compassion in modern history. But the historical record also contains serious criticisms that deserve examination rather than automatic dismissal. The most disturbing question isn't whether Mother Teresa personally believed suffering had spiritual value. It's whether that belief, combined with the way her facilities operated, ever resulted in people enduring pain or illness that could have been treated. Because there is a fundamental difference between helping someone die with dignity... And allowing someone to suffer when they might not have needed to.

Tens of thousands of turkeys being suffocated and terminated by foam 👺A #birdflu infection is a death sentence for all incarcerated animals here. Animals living this close together are the breeding grounds for pandemics. It is unnecessary so we should stop these death camps forever. #EndAnimalExploitation #GoPlantbased #LiveVegan save lives and life on our planet 🙏

These are all of the current wildfires burning in California...Southern California is going up in flames. God Help Us!