Vortexto retweeted
This morning, we launched a new educational campaign aimed at helping Americans understand bitcoin and its place in the world today.
Our campaign will stretch over 12 weeks and includes an educational website, gettingbitcoin.org, a series of 6 essays by leading thinkers in bitcoin, 6 full-page print ads, and 24 quarter-page print ads in the Wall Street Journal.
Each of the six essays will appear as sponsored content in the Wall Street Journal, beginning with today’s by @LynAldenContact .
The public discourse about bitcoin should really be better. This is our attempt to do something about it.
Vortexto retweeted
Hi $kas. Time for a much requested post.
Join me for a deep dive of Bitcoin's and Kaspa's respective fee markets, and a painfully detailed explanation of why I think Kaspa can offer beautiful game theoretic solutions to subsidy that no other network can
kasmedia.com/article/three-w…
Vortexto retweeted
I would even go even further and ask Binance to delist $kas futures from their platform.
Why kas futures is ok but kas on spot is not?
They can ignore kas fully, better for everyone
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
🎯 $KAS is not here to fit in. Its here to make change. $KAS has been exposing how ridiculous exchanges operate in this day and age. If you truly care about cryptoCURRENCY, the cypherpunk movement, PoW, and being able to USE this in our daily lives $KAS is at the forefront.
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
A Call Back to the Roots, Yonatan’s Mic Drop Heard Around Crypto Land (1.2 Million Views and Counting)
Yesterday, Yonatan Sompolinsky, (@hashdag ) founder of Kaspa and co-creator of GHOSTDAG, declined an invitation from @binance after being listed among the top 100 blockchain figures. His post, now seen by more than a million people, was not about the contest or the award. It was about something much larger.
In a few sharp paragraphs, Yonatan did what few in this industry have the courage or credibility to do. He reminded everyone what cryptocurrency and blockchain tech was meant to be.
“Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino.”
That line will likely be quoted for years. It captured the quiet frustration many have felt watching the original cypherpunk vision turn into a spectacle of speculation, personality cults, and meme markets.
Yonatan’s message was not anti-exchange. (maybe) It was a call for accountability. Binance, as the largest exchange in the world, does not simply reflect the market; it defines it. The decision to list a meme coin within weeks while ignoring a fair-launched, PoW-based, Nakamoto-consensus project like Kaspa is not neutral. It shapes what the market values and what it forgets.
When Yonatan wrote, “Binance is part of what defines "strong,” he reminded the industry that power brings responsibility. Exchanges, influencers, and funds who claim to support “strong projects” cannot hide behind market demand when they are the ones setting it.
Kaspa and the Continuation of the Original Thesis
Kaspa’s story has always been about carrying forward Satoshi’s unfinished work. A fair launch. No ICO. No founder rewards. A network built by miners, not marketed by investors. It remains one of the few examples of what can still be called cypherpunk crypto, a system that values decentralization, permissionless access, and proof of work as a defense against capture.
In a world of quick gains and token theatrics, Kaspa represents the opposite approach: build first and earn trust later. Its achievements speak for themselves. Ten blocks per second, the only live implementation of BlockDAG consensus, and the upcoming DAGKnight upgrade which will redefine performance in distributed systems. Alongside it comes vProgs, a programmable validation layer that extends Kaspa’s architecture while preserving its pure PoW principles.
Cryptoland and the Meme Park Era
At @Kaspa_Commons, we have been talking about this shift since we launched in May, although the movement has been around since 2014. The rise of what we called “Cryptoland” has turned much of the industry into a spectacle of entertainment and extraction rather than innovation and freedom. Yonatan’s post gives voice to that quiet disillusionment felt across the real builder community.
Cryptoland has its rides, mascots, and ticket booths. But beyond the flashing lights there remains a small circle of engineers and believers working toward what this movement was always meant to be: an open, decentralized system for digital value and data transfer that cannot be censored or co-opted.
The post’s viral reach was not about rejecting an invitation. It was about reclaiming the microphone. Yonatan voiced what many in the trenches have been too exhausted or too cautious to say. The mission has been corrupted, but it is not lost.
For many, this was a reminder that the cypherpunk fire still burns, and that it now burns brightest inside Kaspa.
In a time when “crypto” has become synonymous with speculation, Yonatan’s words cut through the noise. They remind us that decentralization, fairness, and proof of work are not nostalgic ideals. They are the foundation.
Four years after Kaspa’s fair launch, the project and its community still stand on those principles. In that sense, Yonatan’s post was more than a protest. It was a declaration of purpose.
Kaspa is not asking for recognition. It is reminding the world what real innovation looks like and why it still matters.
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
More proud to be a Kaspian than ever before.
A Call Back to the Roots, Yonatan’s Mic Drop Heard Around Crypto Land (1.2 Million Views and Counting)
Yesterday, Yonatan Sompolinsky, (@hashdag ) founder of Kaspa and co-creator of GHOSTDAG, declined an invitation from @binance after being listed among the top 100 blockchain figures. His post, now seen by more than a million people, was not about the contest or the award. It was about something much larger.
In a few sharp paragraphs, Yonatan did what few in this industry have the courage or credibility to do. He reminded everyone what cryptocurrency and blockchain tech was meant to be.
“Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino.”
That line will likely be quoted for years. It captured the quiet frustration many have felt watching the original cypherpunk vision turn into a spectacle of speculation, personality cults, and meme markets.
Yonatan’s message was not anti-exchange. (maybe) It was a call for accountability. Binance, as the largest exchange in the world, does not simply reflect the market; it defines it. The decision to list a meme coin within weeks while ignoring a fair-launched, PoW-based, Nakamoto-consensus project like Kaspa is not neutral. It shapes what the market values and what it forgets.
When Yonatan wrote, “Binance is part of what defines "strong,” he reminded the industry that power brings responsibility. Exchanges, influencers, and funds who claim to support “strong projects” cannot hide behind market demand when they are the ones setting it.
Kaspa and the Continuation of the Original Thesis
Kaspa’s story has always been about carrying forward Satoshi’s unfinished work. A fair launch. No ICO. No founder rewards. A network built by miners, not marketed by investors. It remains one of the few examples of what can still be called cypherpunk crypto, a system that values decentralization, permissionless access, and proof of work as a defense against capture.
In a world of quick gains and token theatrics, Kaspa represents the opposite approach: build first and earn trust later. Its achievements speak for themselves. Ten blocks per second, the only live implementation of BlockDAG consensus, and the upcoming DAGKnight upgrade which will redefine performance in distributed systems. Alongside it comes vProgs, a programmable validation layer that extends Kaspa’s architecture while preserving its pure PoW principles.
Cryptoland and the Meme Park Era
At @Kaspa_Commons, we have been talking about this shift since we launched in May, although the movement has been around since 2014. The rise of what we called “Cryptoland” has turned much of the industry into a spectacle of entertainment and extraction rather than innovation and freedom. Yonatan’s post gives voice to that quiet disillusionment felt across the real builder community.
Cryptoland has its rides, mascots, and ticket booths. But beyond the flashing lights there remains a small circle of engineers and believers working toward what this movement was always meant to be: an open, decentralized system for digital value and data transfer that cannot be censored or co-opted.
The post’s viral reach was not about rejecting an invitation. It was about reclaiming the microphone. Yonatan voiced what many in the trenches have been too exhausted or too cautious to say. The mission has been corrupted, but it is not lost.
For many, this was a reminder that the cypherpunk fire still burns, and that it now burns brightest inside Kaspa.
In a time when “crypto” has become synonymous with speculation, Yonatan’s words cut through the noise. They remind us that decentralization, fairness, and proof of work are not nostalgic ideals. They are the foundation.
Four years after Kaspa’s fair launch, the project and its community still stand on those principles. In that sense, Yonatan’s post was more than a protest. It was a declaration of purpose.
Kaspa is not asking for recognition. It is reminding the world what real innovation looks like and why it still matters.
Vortexto retweeted
Hi @joerogan — take a minute to read the open letter from @hashdag to @binance.
This deserves a full episode on your podcast.
It’s crossed 950K views in less than 24h and still climbing. Thanks in advance. $kas #kaspa @binance @cz_binance @travladd
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Respect to $KAS founder @hashdag
He had the courage to decline a top-100 blockchain award in Dubai and he did it for the right reasons.
He called out what most founders stay silent about:
The capture of crypto by centralized gatekeepers.
When a fair-launched, 10 BPS blockDAG network like #Kaspa , built on pure Nakamoto Consensus, parallel block validation, and zero premine, is ignored while exchanges push meme tokens with insider liquidity, it is proof that incentives have replaced integrity.
Hashdag’s statement is precision.
He exposed the structural imbalance where CEXs define “strength” by volume and hype instead of protocol quality.
Crypto has turned into a stage where hype outweighs utility, marketing beats engineering, and exposure replaces substance.
Hot air has become more valuable than real technology, real teams, or real knowledge.
Oracle dependencies, API throttling, and listing politics are shaping markets in ways no algorithm can justify.
This is how true decentralization dies:
Not by hacks, but by silence.
Hashdag refused to be part of that silence.
More founders should do the same.
Refuse the staged awards.
Refuse the centralized validation.
Build, prove, publish and make crypto accountable again.
- by $MASTR project
Vortexto retweeted
Every crypto market participant, every developer, investor, and entrepreneur — should stand behind this post.
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Warning: I have not edited this rant into short form. Why? Because I have too much shit to say. Proceed with caution.
--
Crypto was supposed to be a rebellion. A fist through the world’s banks. A digital Molotov lobbed into the vaults of the rich. Tear down kings and middlemen. Replace trust with math. Inject truth straight into the veins of the system.
But then the house took over.
Enter @binance. The great casino in the cloud that turned revolution into a loyalty program. What started as a P2P revolt got hijacked by a PR machine, selling rebellion one meme coin at a time. They took Satoshi’s war drum and looped it into fucking elevator music.
They tell you the market decides. Bullshit. The house decides.
They throttle listings, manufacture narratives, crown the loudest grift, and pedal dopamine to the masses. Flash over function. Decentralization swapped for dependency. Self‑sovereignty gutted for KYC. Revolution repackaged as customer service.
#Binance doesn’t serve crypto ... Binance serves Binance.
But somewhere in this wasteland, a voice cuts through the noise:
“I must decline the Dubai invite.”
@hashdag doesn’t want applause, selfies, or a golden handshake in the desert. Yes, the Kaspa community rallied for this, but mostly to make a point. He declined because this isn’t vanity, it’s principle. The recognition would reward popularity over substance, applause over action. Instead, it’s about #Kaspa. It’s the people who build, mine, verify, and keep the fire alive while the rest of crypto bows to PR and profit.
He’s pointing to the totem of rot, the emblem of how ideals got sold for profit. Proof that a movement can be sold, twisted into theater, and burned for clicks and tickers.
Binance is the loudest example, the standard that sets the tone for the circus. They show the casino playground at its worst: flash over function, profit over principle. Commercial crypto feeds institutions, casino crypto feeds frog addicts, cypherpunk crypto feeds truth.
$KAS is the latter.
His post is a warning to the market’s so‑called leaders: act like you believe in crypto, or step the fuck aside. Protect the experiments that matter. Amplify truth, don’t extort it. This isn’t about glory; it’s about defending the system. Cypherpunk projects aren’t marketing collateral or clout grabs. They’re experiments in freedom and verification. Treat them as sacred, not disposable.
Hear this clearly @cz_binance : you couldn’t ask Satoshi to pay for a listing. And you can’t ask Kaspa for 3%. You can’t tollgate math. Kaspa IS math, not marketing. Fair‑mined. No founders’ stash. No secret investors. Protect it, or get the fuck out of the way.
And to the cypherpunks: Let the house sell its spectacles and crown its frogs. We’ll still be there, mining blocks, running nodes, building something that can’t be bribed or blacklisted. This is being a cypherpunk. Defiance. Code over consent. Truth without permission. Running rigs when they say obsolete. Building when they say impossible. Not begging. Not waiting. Not kneeling.
We are Kaspa. We are the last spark of the cypherpunks.
And truth? Truth doesn’t need to pay for a fucking listing.
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Yonatan’s letter to @Binance has 1.4 million views and 2.1k comments (in the first 23 hours)
Probably nothing
KAS
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Let’s make sure @cz_binance sees this
Actions speak louder than words
If Binance really cares about fundamentally strong projects, $KAS will be listed soon
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Yonatan Sompolinsky (@hashdag) writes with such clarity and elegance here about the hoggishness of Binance and the example it sets. Absolute KO and 🔔 ringer.
💥 🥊
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
The Blockchain 100 winners are here! See who made the list of top crypto creators.
Thank you for voting & celebrating the future of blockchain education.
Check the results 👇
binance.com/en/square/blockc…
Vortexto retweeted
The most monumental email I was ever cc’d on
Replying to @binance
@binance,
Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!
I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.
Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.
There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.
When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.
You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?
Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.
@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.
Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.
We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.
Please fix this.
Thanks again,
hashdag
cc @michaelsuttonil
Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus
Vortexto retweeted
I'll buy 10 $KAS for every comment, like, and reshare on this post (must be following me & I'll share proof).
24H only. Ends at 10:17am PST on 10/21/25.
Make me fiat poor (I'm actually kinda worried).































