Nigel Irvine (@WNI71) profile picture

Don’t do pronouns, when discussing Tran issues, replace “trans” with “fake”, that way it makes sense.

Joined April 2010
Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)Photo by Nigel Irvine (@WNI71)
Apparently @bmc875 doesn’t like to be corrected and/or called out on their lies 🤣🤣🤣
131
Is “her flag pole” a euphemism given it was actually a man?
Yesterday, at Trans Pride London, one of our volunteers was attacked by gender-critical activists posing as a film crew - her flag pole was broken, and she was left distressed. If you were a witness to this incident or know of any other please email: [email protected]. uk
222
I have protected this womxn’s modesty & features that could cause offence to delicate minds. Please don’t retweet as it could highlight the hypocrisy of the original author. 🇮🇳 = 👨
29
222
3
1,158
20,917
I would appreciate it if you didn’t retweet this video of Peter Tatchell sounding a bit noncey. 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
290
2,285
138
4,274
135,004
Hey everyone...JTB wants the story to be about Harry putting himself and his family at risk by announcing how many Taliban he killed and whinging because he didn't get taxpayer funded security. JTB is unhappy with the story being about an invitation. Please repost so he feels better. Bless.🙏
Queen Elizabeth II said it was imperative that Harry and Meghan receive effective security against extremists. Today Harry faces documented threats, the Risk Management Board has paused without explanation, and Buckingham Palace wants the story to be about an invitation. Who changed the plan?
4
3
31
1,402
Nigel Irvine retweeted
🇬🇧 THEY TOLD YOU A STORY. 🇬🇧 Colonisers. Slavers. Oppressors. And you were supposed to feel ashamed. Not for what you done... But for WHO YOU ARE. 🇬🇧 So we tested it. Britain wrote everything down, so we opened the books. 📖 Turns out fewer than 1 man in 10 could vote in the year Britain banned the slave trade. No woman could. Your ancestors could hang for stealing a sheep, get shipped across the world for petty theft, or go down a mine at 8 years old. In Manchester, the average age of death in a labouring family was 17. They weren't running the slave trade. They were underneath it too. Which is what makes what happened next worth knowing. In 1772 an enslaved man named James Somerset walked free from an English court, because English law couldn't hold a slave. In 1791, 300,000 families just stopped buying slave sugar. No march, no riot, just a decision made at 300,000 kitchen tables. In 1792, 519 petitions carrying 390,000 names hit Parliament, most signed by people who couldn't vote themselves. In 1807, Britain banned the trade. Then the slave owners sent Britain a bill for the 800,000 people they still held. 💷 £20 million. About 40% of the entire government budget at the time. The Treasury says it wasn't paid off until 2015. So if your family paid British tax before then, they helped buy 800,000 people their freedom. From 1808 the Royal Navy spent 60 years hunting slave ships at sea: 1,600 stopped, 150,000 people freed, and 1,600 British sailors dead, mostly of disease, buried thousands of miles from home. ⚓ In 1816 they ended two centuries of Barbary corsairs enslaving Europeans. In 1896 a war that lasted 38 minutes ended slavery in Zanzibar. 🇹🇿 Almost every country on Earth outlaws slavery today. That fight was paid for largely at British expense, by British hands.🇬🇧 So why haven't you heard any of this? Because within living memory, someone rewrote the story. You got taught the crime. Not the cure. The powerful exploited the world. They exploited their own people first. It was those people who ended slavery. 🇬🇧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ History got rewritten once, in living memory, by no one who was ever named or held to account. We are ordinary people doing what ordinary people have always done. Opening the books. Refusing to look away. This is how we fight back. Fact by fact. Story by story. Name by name. We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it. If you can afford to support what we do: proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
462
6,557
492
19,793
1,141,255
Nigel Irvine retweeted
Possibly, as Minister for Health, James Murray could compel the adult gender clinics to hand over the data they refused to give to Cass. We might then find out just how much benefit these interventions confer long term, without needing to perform experiments on children too young to give meaningful consent. Read the testimony of the ever-expanding numbers of detransitioners. Grasp that these young people, many of them extremely vulnerable - autistic, care-experienced, abuse survivors, same-sex attracted in unsupportive families - have been irreparably harmed, left with their fertility destroyed, unending medical complications and profound psychological damage. This is a medical scandal of epic proportions and people of power and influence are still too frightened of trans activists and trans lobby groups to do the right thing and put an end to the insanity. Kids are being sacrificed to ideology and cowardice.
365
4,561
123
19,646
414,991
Nigel Irvine retweeted
To all the so-called journalists pushing Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s narrative that Prince Harry “didn’t get security” in the UK, let me do your job for you. Prince Harry does receive police protection in the UK on a case-by-case, bespoke basis with advance notice. What he didn’t get was the automatic, taxpayer-funded protective security reserved only for the reigning Monarch and the Heir. Even working royals such as Princess Royal and the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh don’t receive that same automatic level. Harry argues he should get it because he was born into the Royal Family and served in the military. By that logic, Prince Andrew could claim the same. 🤮 To everyone crying that Prince Harry is a terrorist target. Remind me, who was it that published details of his military service for a payday? He made millions selling out his family and country. If he wants more security, he can fund it himself. Harry is now a private citizen, no longer a working royal carrying out duties for the UK. Demanding the highest level of taxpayer-funded protection anyway is pure entitlement. And no - he wasn’t “denied security.” He was denied the specific level he wanted. You don’t get the perks after walking away from the job. Actions have consequences. Welcome to reality, Harry. Enjoy your “Freedom Flight” 😌
256
582
28
4,402
194,735
This film of Mridul Wadhwa admitting he obtained his job at a rape crisis centre by deception has just been removed by YouTube for "copyright infringement", so please don't watch or share it.
279
8,795
404
10,906
1,117,073
Nigel Irvine retweeted
Replying to @LindyLoo2020
1
1
7
575
All men are excluded from all women's spaces. That is not discrimination. All men are treated the same. My partner of 40 years who I trust with my life is excluded from all women's spaces. As are my sons who I raised. The Pope is excluded. Every man is excluded in the same way. Men who want to take that as an affront to men and try to argue their way around the exclusion are what's known as a red flag. Why would some men be exempt from an exclusion intended for all men? Why should women and girls be expected to accept the risk of allowing men into our spaces on the presumption that they're not likely to be a risk to our safety and the unproven claim that their safety is at risk in male spaces? Gay men. Small men. Drunk men. Old men. Very young men. Infirm men. Foreign men. They could all claim a characteristic that puts them at risk of violence from other men. Should women be responsible for their safety also? Or should men be responsible for what happens in male spaces?
7
214
3
896
6,725
I’d appreciate it if you didn’t share this image please.
30
250
12
1,116
12,691
When ALL proceeds are donated to a registered charity, how is it for personal commercial gain?
I was told that Royals were not meant to use their titles for commercial gain. So why is honey from Camila's Private Garden in Wiltshire being sold in F&M. Her private garden in Wiltshire, btw? Will she be donating the money to charity? #hypocrisy
1
352
I support President Zelenskyy and the brave people of Ukraine! 💙💛 Raise your hand 🖐️and Repost if you do too!!!
995
2,031
138
7,784
125,630
Nigel Irvine retweeted
Raise your hand ✋ if you do 🇺🇦
2,015
3,061
209
27,686
213,989
RETWEET if you stand with President Zelenskyy against Putin! 🇺🇦
507
11,058
141
28,766
366,221
As Zelensky visits the White House and gets bullied again, remember this clip of Marco Rubio explaining the U.S. promised to defend Ukraine FOREVER if they gave up their nukes when the USSR fell. That’s why Lil Marco hides. He hoped we wouldn’t find it. Don’t share it right now.
473
13,319
491
27,545
812,700
❗️Can everyone please STOP using the hashtag #RussianFuelCrisis because it is causing HUGE tailbacks all across russia. Causing people to panic buy which makes the situation EVEN WORSE. So 🙏 DON'T retweet and DON'T use the hashtag #RussianFuelCrisis ever again!!
1,232
8,940
1,041
25,453
1,461,633
Nigel Irvine retweeted
Prince Harry is not fit to be a working royal.😂
77
140
9
1,364
53,424