Walter Wray retweeted
It's important this performative video is met with the scorn that it deserves.
Silence would be unacceptable.
But it's actually worse to have Labour making sad videos whilst continuing to arm a genocide and arrest those who protest. It should be beneath contempt.
Walter Wray retweeted
đš I watched NAZA today.
Its depiction of Israelâs evil war machine was horrific and disturbing.
One of the most chilling moments in NAZA comes when an Israeli soldier reflects on the Nazis and the Holocaust.
He had grown up believing the Nazis represented absolute evil. But after participating in the destruction of Gaza, he began to understand how ordinary people could commit terrible acts and then return home to their ordinary lives.
He asks: âI still see those Nazis as evil, but what does that mean I am?â
Another Israeli soldier acknowledges what happened in Gaza was genocide.
Parts of the film leave you speechless and in tears.
The film is far more disturbing than I can adequately put into words.
Sometimes we struggle to comprehend the suffering of people thousands of miles away. Sometimes it needs to be personal. We need to imagine the people we love being subjected to the same horrors before we truly understand what is being done to others.
So imagine for a moment that Britain was Gaza.
Imagine an Israeli soldier sitting in front of a screen, thousands of miles away, deciding whether your family lives or dies.
Your son has been identified by an AI system as a suspected fighter. There has been no trial. No opportunity to challenge the intelligence. You donât even know he is suspected of anything.
The soldier knows where your son lives. He knows he is at home with you, your wife and your other children.
He could target your son elsewhere. But your family home is an easier target.
The anticipated deaths of your wife, your children and perhaps your neighbours are entered into a calculation. They are considered acceptable.
A button is pressed.
Your home disappears. Your wife is killed. Your children are buried beneath the rubble. Perhaps one survives, screaming for their mother.
The soldier moves on to the next target.
Now imagine this happening across Britain.
Imagine entire streets in London flattened. Families in Manchester wiped out in their homes. Hospitals in Birmingham overwhelmed with children whose limbs have been blown off. Parents in Liverpool digging through concrete with their bare hands, desperately trying to find their children.
Imagine being told to evacuate your home, taking your family somewhere you have been assured is safer, only for that place to be bombed too.
Imagine watching your child slowly starve because food is not getting through. Imagine having to choose which of your children gets the last piece of bread.
Imagine holding your injured daughter while she begs you to stop the pain, knowing there is no functioning hospital you can reach and no medicine to give her.
Now imagine the soldiers responsible discussing these deaths as numbers, targets and operational successes - and as fun!
Imagine them laughing, celebrating, or simply carrying on as though nothing extraordinary has happened.
This is the reality NAZA forces us to confront through the accounts of Israeli soldiers themselves.
The horror is not only the scale of the killing. It is the way human life can be reduced to a calculation. The way killing civilians can become routine. The way an entire population can be subjected to unimaginable suffering while those responsible become detached from the humanity of their victims.
And here is the point.
The Palestinian father pulling his dead child from the rubble loves that child as much as you love yours.
The Palestinian mother desperately searching for her missing daughter feels the same terror you would feel.
Their children are not worth less than ours. Their lives are not worth less than ours.
We should not have to imagine this happening in Britain to recognise the humanity of Palestinians.
But if you cannot comprehend the horror of what Israel has done to Gaza, imagine it happening to your family.
Then ask yourself what you would call the people responsible.
Watch NAZA.
youtu.be/G6zx7XfbUVk?is=Mxw-âŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
Perhaps the most heartless BBC interruption in this compilation is this one:
Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam Policy Lead for Palestine, explains how his family in Gaza have never been allowed to leave Gaza, and how Israel is besieging the Strip and causing mass displacement.
The BBC: "I'm sorry this is obviously very personal, difficult situation for you and your family, and as you would understand as well, Israel would say well, they can't live next door to Hamas."
There is nothing journalistic about this. There is no world where that is a rational, humane response.
The presenters and journalists at the BBC are reading off a strict script where they have to staunchly defend the apartheid entity at all costs.
They have weaponised the term "impartiality", which is what they cite when they launder propaganda. But as we've proven, this "impartiality" has only worked one way.
They interject much less when they platform genocide deniers, and have never volunteered the other things that "Israel says", such as the genocidal statements from Netanyahu, Gallant, Katz, Smotrich and Herzog.
Itâs hard to grasp the BBCâs systematic attempt to launder Israeli propaganda until you see the sheer scale of it. Here's a compilation of them doing it at 2x speed.
The latest was on Newsnight on 4 November. When Bernie Sanders called Israelâs government extremist, Victoria Derbyshire answered for it: âAnd the Israeli government would deny that they are extremists.â
As this video shows, BBC presenters repeatedly do this as guests describe Israelâs crimes: âIsrael would say.â âIsrael would deny.â âThey would reject that.â
We counted 70 of these denials and justifications in 52 aired interviews. The BBC calls this impartiality. But in not one of those 52 did a presenter raise any of these words from Israelâs own leaders:
- âWe are fighting human animals.â Yoav Gallant, 9 October 2023
- âIt is an entire nation out there that is responsible.â Isaac Herzog, 12 October 2023
- âThey will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.â Israel Katz, 13 October 2023
- âRemember what Amalek did to you.â Benjamin Netanyahu, 3 November 2023
- Starving two million people in Gaza until the hostages came back might be âjustified and moralâ. Bezalel Smotrich, 5 August 2024
On 10 October 2023, Tahani Mustafa told the BBC that Israeli forces were not distinguishing civilians from fighters. The presenter replied: âThey would reject that.â Mustafa then had to bring up Gallantâs âhuman animalsâ herself. The BBC supplied the denial. The guest had to supply Israelâs own words.
That is cherry-picking. The Royal Charter requires the BBC to be impartial, and the public pays for it through the licence fee. In these interviews, it handed its audience Israelâs denials and left out its leadersâ own words, during a genocide streamed live to the world.
We have archived the BBCâs coverage for three years, and we are now counting all of it: 50,000 video clips and many more written excerpts.
We are calling this first part: "BBC: The Would Say Files".
Handing Israel its denials is only one of the ways the BBC launders Israeli propaganda, so we will count every other technique too. Over the next few weeks, we will announce each milestone as we complete the report.
These are the first results, with every clip, quote and source: newscord.org/editorials/bbc-âŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
We want the UK Government to launch an inquiry into any British involvement in Israeli operations in Gaza.
This petition is so close to the 100,000 needed to be considered for a debate in Parliament.
Please sign & share - let's get it over the line!
petition.parliament.uk/petitâŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
The images of kids submerged in freezing floodwater, in flimsy tents that won't survive another winter, make me SICK.
I think of Primo Leviâs words that every European learns by heart at school - only to forget when entering politics or diplomacy.
The shame of our time.
Walter Wray retweeted
Ms. Rachel: âCan we take a second to think about how if we were freezing cold in tents and they were flooded and our babies were going to freeze and thereâs a government, the Israeli government, that wonât let the warm supplies through so more kids are gonna die and weâre just like, all the nations, all the people, all the leaders, just like yeah thatâs gonna happen again. You and I should not be ashamed that we are loud and we are constantly saying stopâ
Walter Wray retweeted
Credit to The Observer for running an interview with Palestine Action's Huda Ammori as its front page story. Annoying all the right people.
archive.is/20261108090511/htâŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
For last 24 hours Iâve seen footage of horrific scenes from Gaza, just absolute human misery. Yet..itâs not there on any news outletâs home pages, not discussed on our witless political shows. Weâre just going to ignore it? Is that the plan?
Walter Wray retweeted
"Now you get all the Labour MPs saying.. Abdul El-Sayed is so good. You would have 100% blocked him"
Yep! @michaeljswalker remembers how El-Sayed was in the UK in 2019 campaigning for Labour candidate Faiza Shaheen. Who was subsequently blocked by the Labour right leadership.
Walter Wray retweeted
The BBCâs veteran World Affairs Editor has made a remarkable discovery: Israelâs strategy is ethnic cleansing and land theft.
I hope the BBC is paying him well. It takes real investigative talent to uncover these things.
Walter Wray retweeted
The Great Dismantling: International Law in the Age of Zionist Genocide:
thinkingpalestine.com/the-grâŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
Israel is not only murdering children. It's a slow torturous death. Paid for with tax dollars now under control of Democrats. Own it.
Walter Wray retweeted
This is extraordinary from Laura Kuensberg. Polanski answered her questions but rejected her chosen framing. That's meat-and-potatoes stuff for combative interviewing.
It is very telling she reaches for this one interview to illustrate some broader anti-truth/populist politics - but says nothing about how we had a Labour Party leader/PM in Keir Starmer who lied, constantly, repeatedly, and flagrantly - who invented a political character from whole cloth to dupe the Labour membership. He lied on TV constantly - big lies, small lies, serious lies and frivolous lies. And he followed on from Boris Johnson, another fabulous liar, who made his career on changing the subject and dancing around questions, much to the delight of Kuensberg and the media class, who treated him with affection and kid gloves on his path to power.
I think it's obvious that Kuensberg just doesn't like or support progressive politics. That's fine. But don't try launder that into a ham-fisted critique saying the left has a problem with journalistic inquiry - and don't imply bad faith and dishonesty, when it has been progressives who called out the honest truth of Israel's genocide in Gaza while the establishment laundered it as "self-defence" or repeated nonsense about human shields.
Hi @bbclaurak,
Zionism has resulted in the bombing of children & the killing of tens of thousands of innocent people in Gaza.
Again - the actual controversy is the Labour Government are arming that & the BBC 'debate' if it's racist.
How's that for answering the question?
Walter Wray retweeted
Itâs hard to grasp the BBCâs systematic attempt to launder Israeli propaganda until you see the sheer scale of it. Here's a compilation of them doing it at 2x speed.
The latest was on Newsnight on 4 November. When Bernie Sanders called Israelâs government extremist, Victoria Derbyshire answered for it: âAnd the Israeli government would deny that they are extremists.â
As this video shows, BBC presenters repeatedly do this as guests describe Israelâs crimes: âIsrael would say.â âIsrael would deny.â âThey would reject that.â
We counted 70 of these denials and justifications in 52 aired interviews. The BBC calls this impartiality. But in not one of those 52 did a presenter raise any of these words from Israelâs own leaders:
- âWe are fighting human animals.â Yoav Gallant, 9 October 2023
- âIt is an entire nation out there that is responsible.â Isaac Herzog, 12 October 2023
- âThey will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.â Israel Katz, 13 October 2023
- âRemember what Amalek did to you.â Benjamin Netanyahu, 3 November 2023
- Starving two million people in Gaza until the hostages came back might be âjustified and moralâ. Bezalel Smotrich, 5 August 2024
On 10 October 2023, Tahani Mustafa told the BBC that Israeli forces were not distinguishing civilians from fighters. The presenter replied: âThey would reject that.â Mustafa then had to bring up Gallantâs âhuman animalsâ herself. The BBC supplied the denial. The guest had to supply Israelâs own words.
That is cherry-picking. The Royal Charter requires the BBC to be impartial, and the public pays for it through the licence fee. In these interviews, it handed its audience Israelâs denials and left out its leadersâ own words, during a genocide streamed live to the world.
We have archived the BBCâs coverage for three years, and we are now counting all of it: 50,000 video clips and many more written excerpts.
We are calling this first part: "BBC: The Would Say Files".
Handing Israel its denials is only one of the ways the BBC launders Israeli propaganda, so we will count every other technique too. Over the next few weeks, we will announce each milestone as we complete the report.
These are the first results, with every clip, quote and source: newscord.org/editorials/bbc-âŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
If only there was a party that already had this as policy...
Join.greenparty.org.uk
Labour members are urging the Government to take decisive action against Israel by:
â
recognising the genocide in Gaza
â
imposing wider sanctions on Israel
â
ending all arms sales
â
supporting an immediate and lasting ceasefire
Agree? Sign here: mtm.is/gazapetition
Walter Wray retweeted
Why wonât fellow journalists condemn Nick Cohen?
If Palestine Action wanted to stop the mass arrests of its supporters, if it wanted to escape its designation as a terrorist group, if it wanted to allow Sally Rooney to enjoy her royalty payments, and if, above all, it wanted to actually help Palestinians, it would renounce violence.
Its co-founder Huda Ammori is at the Supreme Court today to argue that the government's proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist group is a breach of our human rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
She faces an obvious difficulty. The vicars and Quakers the police arrests for defending Palestine Action might uphold the best traditions of peaceful assembly and protest. But the hardcore supporters of Palestine Action do not.
âïž Nick Cohen
Article | spectator.com/article/why-woâŠ
Walter Wray retweeted
Exclusive: Andy Burnham ally Clive Lewis says the continued Palestine Action ban is a "sh*tshowâ and calls on the government to extend sanctions on Israel.
@labourlewis told Helena on Novara Live that the ban is âtoxic for the Labour partyâ - and that it will become an issue at the next general election unless itâs reversed.
âThe sooner we can drop it and move away from it the better.â
Walter Wray retweeted
Keep posting people, especially in the UK, where the Labour Party is one of the last remaining governments actively protecting Israel as they execute the genocide of the Palestinians.































