Crypto Faze🚀🐞 $GAME

@taikoxyz @daniel_taikoxyz @dani_who_daniel Someone from Taiko's team wrote the following message in the discord (screenshot). I completely disagree with this. I understand the situation when a person just wanted to test the network, made a bridge, made 2 transactions in the network and did nothing else, and he or she will not be eligible for airdrop. But the situation is quite different here. You create Galxe quests and simply exploit people. If I'm not mistaken, you had 16 Galxe quest campaigns. In each of them, a person had to subscribe to your social networks, like you, retweet you, download apps - to generate completely fictitious social activity for free. No one in their right mind would do this without expecting some kind of reward. You can say that you didn't force people to do this, and that's true, but you informed everyone about the new campaign every time, encouraging people to give you fake metrics as much as possible. At the end of the day, you brag about this activity to investors, thus raising the valuation of your project. In order to get a significant number of points in your quests, you needed to have a Gitcoin Passport or Galxe Passport. It became unrealistically difficult to get 20 points in Gitcoin Passport after their last change (to do this quickly you need to go through 2 kyc verification), most people chose Galxe Passport because here you need to go through 1 kyc verification and pay about $6-8. If a person doesn't want to go through these terrible verifications, they can't get a significant amount of points. The Trust Bonus campaign on Galxe was completed by 735 thousand people. And you are ready to airdrop only for 300 thousand. You are now completely devaluing the work that people have done while you have been exploiting them for a long period of time. And you say that it is difficult for you to choose from 1.2 million 300 thousand wallets. So you wouldn't have to choose so hard if you allocated at least 10% of the issue for the airdrop, not 5% for 7 large groups of participants. Where is the decentralisation? Has anyone seen it in crypto at least once in the last year? And don't talk to me about 2 airdrop. 2 airdrops are always shit. I fully agree that teamwork is more valuable than a Twitter subscription, but someone in the team does more and someone less. But for some reason, you don't choose 20% of the team to receive salaries and tokens. So why do you take it upon yourself to despise the work of ordinary people whom you have exploited, choose the "best" of them, and leave the majority of people with nothing?